Amend_02_RFP_FA8903-19-R-0020.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE INSTALLATION CONTRACTING AGENCY

JBSA Lackland, TX 78236

25 February 2019

MEMORANDUM FOR OFFERORS

FROM 772 ESS/PKB

2261 Hughes Ave, Ste 163

JBSA Lackland, TX 78236-9853

SUBJECT: Amend 02 (Revised Q&A Question #1) to Request for Proposal (RFP), FA8903-

19-R-0020, Long Term Management (LTM) at Multiple Sites for Dobbins Air

Reserve Base (ARB), Georgia

1. This RFP is being issued in accordance with (IAW) FAR 13.5 and is a total small business set aside under NAICS 562910 (size standard 750 employees). The Government anticipates awarding a competitive Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contract.

2. Notice to offerors /suppliers: The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the

Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs. Request your proposal remain valid for Government acceptance for a period of 120 days after the date proposals are due.

3. The purpose of this effort is to provide Long Term Management (LTM) at Multiple Sites for

Dobbins Air Reserve Base (ARB), Georgia. The requirement shall be completed in accordance with all applicable technical and regulatory requirements and the Performance Work Statement

(PWS) dated 14 February 2019, Attachment (1). The Base Support Letter (BSL) is also provided as Attachment (2).

4. The period of performance (PoP) will be approximately 12 months from date of award.

Please provide total project costs on the attached Schedule B, (Attachment 3).

5. Service Contract Act Wage Determinations: Wage Determination No. 2015-4471, Rev

11, dated 26 December 2018, Attachment (4) is applicable to this RFP.

6. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS.

6.1 Proposals shall be submitted no later than 1:00 PM CT on 4 March 2019. If your proposal is received after the time and date listed, it will not be considered or evaluated for award. Offerors shall submit an electronic copy of the entire technical and cost proposal to the

POCs in paragraph 14. The proposal format shall be compatible with Adobe PDF and/or

Microsoft Word/Excel. Cost/price proposal must be in EXCEL format.

6.2 Proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government’s requirements; but, rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet the requirements.

6.3 If page limits are exceeded, the excess pages will be destroyed and will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal.

6.4 The proposal shall not contain any extraneous information such as advertisements, or marketing information.

6.5 The proposal shall contain the following information as outlined below:

Paragraph

Number Title Page Limit

CONTRACT

DOCUMENTATION

6.5.1.1 Cover Letter

Unlimited 6.5.1.2

Tax Liability Form

(Attachment 5)

6.5.1.3 Internal Confidentiality

Agreement (Attachment 6)

6.5.1.4 Representations and

Certifications (Attachment 7)

PRICE (FACTOR 1)

6.5.2.2 Schedule B (Attachment 3) Unlimited

TECHNICAL (FACTOR 2)

6.5.3.1 Technical Approach 10

6.5.3.2 Schedule Unlimited

6.5.3.3 Management Approach 5

6.5.1. CONTRACTUAL DOCUMENTATION

6.5.1.1. Offerors shall provide a cover letter in their proposal to include current points of contact (Contract Manager and Program Manager), cage code, mailing address, current e-mail address and phone number. Offerors shall also confirm proposal validity for 120 days.

6.5.1.2. In accordance with FAR 52.209-11, offerors are required to complete

Attachment (5), “Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax

Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law (Feb 2016)”.

6.5.1.3. By submitting a proposal, the Offeror agrees to comply with the provision at FAR 52.203-18 entitled “Prohibition on Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality Agreements – Representation

(Jan 2017)” and the clause at FAR 52.203-19 entitled “Prohibition on

Contracting with Entities that Require Certain Internal Confidentiality

Agreements (Jan 2017)”, Attachment (6). The clause will be incorporated at contract award.

6.5.1.4. Offerors shall include a completed copy of the provision at 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Items, with its proposal, Attachment (7).

6.5.2. PRICE

6.5.2.1. Cost and Pricing Data are not required under this competitive acquisition;

but, if only one proposal is received, cost and pricing data may be required (which may include other than cost and pricing data or certified cost and pricing data).

The offeror, however, shall submit:

6.5.2.2. Complete SCHEDULE B, Attachment (3).

6.5.2.3. Any cost or pricing information submitted shall be addressed ONLY in the pricing section.

6.5.3. TECHNICAL

Offerors shall include their technical narratives for FACTOR 2. The technical narrative portion shall be in the same exact order as the tasks identified within the PWS.

6.5.3.1. Offerors shall provide a technical approach that discusses the offeror’s approach to completing all of the environmental requirements in the PWS. This section is limited to 10 pages. At a minimum, the following should be addressed in the technical approach:

o Approach to complete all environmental services and necessary reporting in accordance with the PWS and appropriate regulatory requirements o Ability to meet unique requirements for conducting work at Dobbins ARB, GA to include meeting the appropriate access and security requirements.

o Compliance with and understanding of all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations as they relate to environmental requirements; proposed field activities adhere and meet all applicable environmental statutes, agreements, and regulatory requirements.

6.5.3.2. Offerors shall include a proposed schedule for completing the effort within the requested Period of Performance (PoP). The schedule shall illustrate the plan to meet the delivery dates. The schedule may be submitted in MS Project format, but must also be accompanied by a portable document format (pdf) version of the printed schedule.

6.5.3.3 Offerors shall submit a management approach detailing how they plan to accomplish all the requirements of the PWS. The management approach shall not exceed five (5) pages. At a minimum, the following shall be included:

o Description of the field and management team, including key personnel, and how these will interact and operate.

o Brief discussion of qualifications and experience of all proposed management, technical onsite and reach back personnel (to include subcontractors) for supporting the requirements outlined in the PWS, and the ability to meet the

Government’s requested PoP with support infrastructure in-place or near locations.

o Approach for managing unscheduled events while maintaining communication with the Air Force.

o Identify any teaming partner/subcontractor role for this effort, how they will manage the teaming partner/subcontractor proposed, and identify key teaming partner/subcontractor staff qualifications and experience as they relate to technical requirements.

6.5.3.4. Technical approach is limited to 10 pages. The Schedule does not count towards the page count. Management approach is limited to 5 pages. The total number of pages allotted for this section is 15. Note that each “face” of a sheet is considered a “page”.

7. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS

7.1. The Government will review all proposals received to determine if they are responsive to the RFP requirements. A responsive proposal is one that meets all the terms, conditions, and specifications of the RFP. Offerors must provide all documents listed and comply with all submission instructions in order for their proposal to be considered “responsive” to this RFP.

7.2. Selection shall be made on a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) basis.

LPTA means that the best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price determined reasonable. The LPTA evaluation approach process will be as follows:

Step 1 – Rank all proposals by price.

Step 2 – Evaluate the three (3) lowest priced proposals for technical acceptability and price reasonableness. If there are not at least three (3) proposals received under subject RFP then evaluate the number of proposals received for technical acceptability and price reasonableness.

Note: For purposes of efficiency only the three (3) lowest priced proposals will be evaluated for technical acceptability and price reasonableness. If any of the lowest priced proposals are rated technically unacceptable, the evaluation process will flow down and continue with the next lowest priced proposal, one by one until a proposal is determined technically acceptable or until no proposals remain to be evaluated. If less than three (3) proposals are received then all proposals will be evaluated for technical acceptability and price reasonableness.

8. EVALUATION CRITERIA. Factors that will be evaluated under this RFP include:

FACTOR 1 – PRICE

FACTOR 2 – TECHNICAL

FACTOR 2 will be used to determine whether the proposal is TECHNICALLY

ACCEPTABLE. Please note that any assumptions provided with your proposal will be reviewed and may affect your technical acceptability.

8.1. The following ADJECTIVAL RATINGS will be used to assess whether a proposal is

TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE.

8.1.1. ACCEPTABLE. Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

8.1.2. UNACCEPTABLE. Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Proposals with an UNACCEPTABLE rating in Factor 2 - Technical will not be eligible for award.

8.2. FACTOR 1 – PRICE

8.2.1. Price analysis will be conducted. The three (3) lowest priced proposals will be evaluated for technical acceptability and price reasonableness. If less than three (3) proposals are received then all proposals will be evaluated for technical acceptability and price reasonableness.

8.2.2. The proposed price will be evaluated on bottom line price for the entire effort, including options (if applicable). A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business. The three (3) lowest priced technically acceptable proposals will be evaluated utilizing the techniques as outlined in FAR 15.404 – Proposal Analysis.

8.2.3. If only one (1) proposal is received and is determined to be awardable the price evaluation team may request the Offeror to submit cost and pricing data.

8.2.4. Total price shall be entered on Schedule B, Attachment (3). Please enter all amounts in whole dollars.

8.3. FACTOR 2 - TECHNICAL

8.3.1 This criteria is met when the contractor proposes an achievable, technically sound, realistic approach that clearly and completely demonstrates how they intend to complete the environmental requirements in accordance with the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The

Government will evaluate the technical approach based on the following:

o Proposal demonstrates approach to complete all environmental services and necessary reporting in accordance with the PWS and appropriate regulatory requirements; proposal shall be clear, concise and shall include sufficient detail for an effective evaluation.

o Proposal adequately demonstrates a thorough understanding and ability to meet the unique requirements for conducting work at Dobbins ARB, GA and meeting the appropriate access and security requirements.

o Proposal demonstrates compliance with and understanding of all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations as they relate to environmental requirements; proposed field activities adhere and meet all applicable environmental statutes, agreements, and regulatory requirements.

8.3.2. This criteria is met with the contractor proposes a schedule for completing the effort within the requested Period of Performance (PoP) that is achievable, measureable, and demonstrates progress towards achieving the proposed objectives, as stated in the PWS. The schedule shall illustrate the plan to meet the delivery dates.

8.3.3 This criteria is met when the contractor adequately demonstrates a comprehensive management approach that includes a qualified technical and management team, including key personnel with in-depth relevant experience, to efficiently and effectively manage the requirements, and ensure quality services and deliverables in order to achieve all of the requirements in the PWS. The Government will evaluate the management approach based on the following:

o Proposal clearly identifies roles and responsibilities of the field and management team and how well the team will interact and operate; key personnel shall be clearly identified.

o Proposal clearly demonstrates the qualifications of all proposed management, technical onsite and reach back personnel (to include subcontractors) for supporting the requirements outlined in the PWS, and the ability to meet the

Government’s requested PoP; support infrastructure shall be in-place or near the location needing the support.

o Proposal demonstrates an efficient and effective approach for managing unscheduled events while maintaining communication with the Air Force.

o Proposal identifies teaming partner and/or subcontractor role(s) for this effort;

demonstrates how Prime will manage the teaming partner(s) and/or subcontractor(s); clearly identifies key subcontractor staff qualifications and experience as they relate to technical requirements.

9. The Government may award without discussions. Offerors should submit their proposal with this in mind. The Government, however, may conduct discussions, if the CO determines this is in the best interest of the Government. Upon receipt of the proposals, the CO and technical representatives will review the proposals after which the CO will decide to award without conducting discussions/negotiations or to hold discussions with one or more offerors. When discussions/negotiations are conducted, each offeror with whom discussions/negotiations were opened shall be given an opportunity to revise their initial proposal to reflect any changes that result from the discussions/negotiations. The CO will award the contract to the offeror presenting the best value to the Government, based on either the initial or revised proposal.

10. BASIS OF AWARD. The Government intends to award a single contract from this RFP to the responsible offeror whose proposal conforms to the RFP’s requirements (includes all stated terms, conditions, and all other information required by the RFP) and is determined to represent the BEST VALUE to the Government. BEST VALUE under this RFP means the

Government will select the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated reasonable price under the LOWEST PRICED TECHNICALLY ACCEPTABLE process.

This process does not permit tradeoffs and proposals are evaluated for acceptability, but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors.

11. CRITICAL MILESTONES

MILESTONES SCHEDULE

RFP Released 25 January 2019

Questions Regarding RFP Due 2:00 PM CT on 8 February 2019

Government Responses Released 19 February 2019

Proposal Due Date 1:00 PM CT on 4 March 2019

12. The combination of the Prime and any Contractor Team Arrangement partners under the contract must adhere to FAR 52.219-14, which states that at least 50 percent of the cost of contract performance incurred for personnel shall be expended for employees of the concern.

13. The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular 2005-95, or most current version. The provisions at FAR

52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial and FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial

Items, apply to this acquisition. The specific instructions and evaluation criteria are included in this RFP letter.

The clauses at FAR 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions – Commercial Items and 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statues or Executive Orders –

Commercial Items apply to this acquisition. Additional FAR, DFARS, and AFFARS provisions and clauses that are applicable to this acquisition are also included in Attachment (8).

14. ANY QUESTIONS or CONCERNS regarding this requirement shall be submitted in writing to the CO, Rosalinda Sparks at rosalinda.sparks@us.af.mil and copy the Contracting

Specialist, Edward Lerma at edward.lerma@us.af.mil NLT the date and time listed in Paragraph

11, Critical Milestones. Note that questions will not be accepted after the date listed. All questions shall be submitted on Attachment (9). As of the date of this letter, you are requested not to contact anyone other than the points of contacts identified in this paragraph to discuss this effort. Your proposal and all communications shall be directed to the Contracting Officer.

ROSALINDA SPARKS

Contracting Officer

Atch (10):

1. Revised PWS dtd 14 February 2019 & Revised Exhibit AB CDRLs dtd 14 February 2019

2. Base Support Letter dtd 13 December 2017

3. Schedule B

4. Service Contract Act Wage Determination No. 2015-4471, Rev 4, dtd 26 Dec 2018

5. FAR 52.209-11 “Representation by Corporations Regarding Delinquent Tax Liability or a

Felony Conviction under any Federal Law (Feb 2016)

6. FAR 52.203-18 & 52.203-19 Internal Confidentiality Agreements dated Jan 2017

7. FAR Clause 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Items

8. FAR Clause 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statues or

Executive Orders – Commercial Items and Additional Provisions and Clauses

9. Q&A, dtd 19 25 February 19 mailto:rosalinda.sparks@us.af.mil mailto:edward.lerma@us.af.mil