RE C_DRAFT_ITO_and_EVC_MATRIX_18_Dec_13_Final.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Air Force Installation Contracting Agency (AFICA) - Regional Engineering and Construction (RE&C) IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- FA8903-14-RFI_AFCEC_REC_Construction_IDIQ
About this file
The purpose of this notice is to obtain Questions/Comments to the DRAFT Instructions to Offerors and Evaluation Criteria Matrix dated 18 Dec 2013. Please note this matrix is preliminary and subject to change as the government further finalizes our acquisition strategy for this requirement.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Final_REC_SOW_Comments_Labor_Categories__19_Feb_14.pdf | ||
| FINAL_REC_SOW_19_Feb_2014.pdf | ||
| RE C_Contractor_Question_Comments_Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Table_Attachment_L8_to_the_Offeror_REC.doc | DOC document | |
| Contractor_Question_Template_REC.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Draft_REC_25_Nov_13_for_Posting_on_FBO.docx | DOCX document | |
| RE C_Home-Field_Category.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RE C_Regional_Map.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RE&C Draft L&M Matrix
| DRAFT Instructions to Offerors and Evaluation Criteria Matrix | |||
| REGIONAL ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION (RE&C) | |||
| Dated 18 Dec 2013 | |||
| Instructions to Offerors | Evaluation Criteria | Page Limitation | |
| Factor 1 - Technical Approach | |||
| Subfactor 1: Technical/Management Capabilities | 8 |
The Offeror shall submit a management plan that applies to all geographical locations included in AFCEC's mission for the entire scope of the SOW over the period of performance for this contract. The plan shall include:
The criteria for Subfactor 1 is met when the Offeror adequately demonstrates a sound, comprehensive, realistic, effective, and efficient approach that reflects:
| 1. The Offeror's corporate structure delineating the functional relationships and interactions between senior leadership, teaming partners, and key personnel assigned to this contract extending from the corporate to the project management level. | Management of the appropriate qualified team to execute the entire scope of the requirements of the SOW. |
| 2. The Offeror's corporate process to manage teaming partners and subcontractors to include master schedule integration of subcontractors. |
Management of teaming partners and subcontractors while maintaining quality and keeping projects within scope and budget and on schedule.
3. The Offerors's corporate process to provide comprehensive Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) enforcement of subcontractors. QA/QC that complies with requirements in Unified Facilities Guide Specification (UFGS) 01 45 00.00 10.
| Subfactor 2: Corporate Experience | 9 |
| The Offeror shall use Attachment L-8, Format Examples to provide information for this subfactor. The government will not consider performance on an effort that was not substantially complete (greater than or equal to 80% complete as of the due date of the initial proposal) within the last three (3) years. Projects may only submitted once to meet the requirements of this subfactor. |
The criteria for Subfactor 2 is met when the Offeror adequately demonstrates concurrent, realistic planning and execution, in-depth analysis and procedures and comprehensive, technical experience of the entire scope of requirements to provide regional support of the AFCEC mission in accordance with the requirements outlined in the SOW and DoD standards. Experience shall be commensurate with the size, scope and technical complexity of this requirement. Individual elements will be met when:
1. The Offeror shall provide eight (8) projects performed concurrently in geographically dispersed locations with a minimum contract award of $4M per contract. Provide a brief narrative for each project listed. Out of the eight (8) projects:
*Geographically dispersed - Projects are located sufficiently apart to preclude sharing on-site personnel.
(a) At minimum of five (5) projects must have been managed by the Offeror as the prime contractor.
(b) At least one of the projects must have a minimum contract award of $10M
(c) A minimum of one (1) project with scope that included removal of UXOs. Project information shall include analysis and procedures associated with the successful removal of a UXO and the application of those processes in a project approved by Dept of Defense Explosive Safety Board (DDESB) federal mandates.
(d) The narrative for each project shall include information on implementation of QA/QC that complied with Unified Facilities Guide Specification (UFGS) 01 45 00.00 10 and how warranty issues were addressed.
(e) A minimum of one (1) project that attained certification using a third party green building certification program meeting the requirements of Energy Independence and Security Act 07.
(f) A minimum of six (6) projects must have been accomplished within the region for which the proposal is submitted.
(g) The table summary shall be formatted as provided in the Concurrent, Geographically Dispersed Projects Format provided in Attachment L-8 Format Examples.
Projects submitted in attachment L-8 reflect adequate experience in concurrent, geographically dispersed project as called for in the instructions.
2. The Offeror shall provide five (5) Design-Build Projects with a minimum contract award amount of $1M that have been managed by the Offeror as the prime contractor. Provide a brief narrative for each project listed. The projects shall meet the following criteria:
(a) The narrative for each project shall include information on implementation of QA/QC that complied with Unified Facilities Guide Specification (UFGS) 01 45 00.00 10 and how warranty issues were addressed.
(b) At least one of the projects must have a minimum contract award of $10M
(c) A minimum of one (1) project that attained certification using a third party green building certification program meeting the requirements of Energy Independence and Security Act 07.
(d) A minimum of three (3) projects must have been performed within the region for which the Offeror is submitting
(e) The table summary shall be formatted as provided in the Design Build Projects Format provided in Attachment L-8 Format Examples.
Projects submitted in attachment L-8 reflect adequate experience in concurrent, geographically dispersed project as called for in the instructions.
| NOTES | N/A |
| Teaming Limitation: Each Offeror may submit once as a Prime contractor and may engage in one additional teaming arrangement. | |
| Bonding Requirement: Each Offeror will need to demonstrate sufficient bonding capacity; the Government is anticipating the minimum aggreate bonding requirement for each region to be $40M. This requirement will be required to be submitted independent of the technical portion of the proposal. |
Page &P of &N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .