Attach 3-Evaluation Factor.pdf
PDF 98 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA875125R0005
About this file
This document details the Evaluation Factors for an Architect-Engineering (A/E) solicitation for Environmental Compliance services at Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) in Rome, NY. The solicitation (FA875125R0005) is a Total Small Business set-aside for environmental compliance, design, and related professional services with a maximum ordering amount of $4,500,000 over a five-year period. Evaluation will occur across nine key factors totaling 155 possible points, including past performance (30 points), professional qualifications (20 points), specialized experience (15 points), and an interview/discussion phase (50 additional points).
Key requirements include ability to respond within two hours to emergency environmental requests, coordinate with local authorities, conduct environmental surveys and inspections, provide environmental compliance training, manage hazardous materials databases, and support environmental restoration programs. Firms must submit a completed Standard Form 330 (SF330) by 3:00 PM on 18 June 2025 via email. The government will select firms based on a comprehensive evaluation process that considers experience, capabilities, responsiveness, and performance in Department of Defense environmental compliance projects, with a focus on firms serving the Air Force Research Laboratory's Information Directorate and associated sites in New York State.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attach 1-Statement of Scope 2025.pdf | ||
| Attach 2-SF330 AE Qualification.pdf | ||
| Attach 4-Interview Questions.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION FACTORS
(1) PAST PERFORMANCE. Evaluators will award up to 30 points based on the past performance of the firm with respect to their execution of DoD and other contracts, both Government and private. Evaluation parameters will be set to allow points to be awarded based on level of past performance relevant to the requirements of the Notice of Intent. Parameters will range from extensive, for maximum points award, to little/no experience for the least number of points award. Contractor shall note if past performance on DoD contracts was as a Prime or Subcontractor.
Reports of completed DoD contracts listed in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) will be reviewed for performance on Government contracts.
FAPIIS provides users access to integrity and performance information from the FAPIIS reporting module in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) and suspension/debarment information from the Entity Management section of SAM database.
FAPIIS will only display integrity and performance information entered on or after April 15, 2011. Anything earlier will be verified on the CPARS page at http://www.cpars.gov/.
(2) PROFESSIONAL QUALIFICATIONS. Evaluators will award up to 20 points based on their judgment of the professional qualifications and experience of the prime contractor and other firms submitted as part of the team. Contractor must note if they were a Prime or Subcontractor.
(3) CAPACITY FOR TIMELY ACCOMPLISHMENT OF WORK. Evaluators will award up to 10 points in judgement of the capacity of the prime contractor and other firms submitted as part of the team to accomplish the requirements of the Notice of Intent.
(4) SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE. Evaluators will award up to 15 points based on judgment of firms experience relevant to the requirements of the Notice of Intent, with emphasis on projects that required Department of Defense (DoD) and/or United States Air Force (USAF) environmental compliance criteria.
(5) LOCATION. Evaluators will award up to 10 points based on the firm's familiarity with work at AFRL/RI, the locality of (Rome, NY) and its local laws and regulations regarding environmental compliance.
(6) TWO HOUR RESPONSE TIME. All firms responding to the Notice of Intent will be considered. However, evaluators will award either 5 or 0 points based on the firm's ability to clearly and convincingly demonstrate the ability to meet the two-hour response time for emergency requests. The firm either passes or fails the demonstration and is given points accordingly.
(7) VOLUME OF DOD WORK. Evaluations will consider the volume of work previously awarded to the firm by the DoD or a subcontractor to the DoD in the last 12 months and will award up to 5 points with the objective of effecting an equitable distribution of DoD contracts among qualified A-E firms. Firms with a greater volume of DoD work will be awarded fewer points and vice versa.
(8) KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE WITH GOVERNMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.
Evaluations will consider the firm's knowledge and experience with current government environmental compliance platforms, such as the ability to complete Hazardous Material/Waste Database Entry and reporting into Environmental, Safety and Occupational Health-Management
Information System, Air Quality Database entry and reporting into Air Program Information Management System, and environmental restoration reporting into the Environmental Restoration Program Information Management System. Ability to provide record management for the Environmental program, and use innovative design in environmental compliance, remedial and facility design arenas and will be awarded up to 10 points based on the firm’s past experience with these specific items.
(9) INTERVIEW/DISCUSSION. The Final Selection Board will award up to 50 additional points to the three highest scoring firms, as determined by the Pre-Selection Board. These 50 points will be awarded on, but not limited to, the following criteria: clear understanding of the Scope of Work; examples of outstanding past performance; customer responsiveness; examples of projects completed ahead of schedule; cost control; use of creativeness and imagination in design development; and response to questions from Final Selection Board members.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .