Industry_Day_Charts_28_Jul_2014.pdf

Industry Day 2014

Agile Acquisition (AA) Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity

(ID/IQ) Contract

Robert Reyes Contracting Officer

Overview

• Dates/Location/Agenda

• Introductions

• Rules of Engagement

• Industry Day Objectives

• AA ID/IQ Contract Overview

• Contract Criteria

• Draft Section M

• Contract Information

• Questions

Date/Location

• Monday & Tuesday, July 28th – 29th One day prior to AFMC EB Small Business Industry Day

• Eglin Conference Center Building 16

• Small Business 1-on-1, July 28th 1130 to 1700 Building 349, Conference Room 306

• Large Business 1-on-1, July 29th 0900 to 1330 Building 349, Conference Room 305

Agenda

Day 1 (Monday, 7/28)

Day 2 (Tuesday, 7/29)

• 0900-1100: Brief all businesses (LB&SB) on concept of AA IDIQ and solicit group feedback

• 1130-1700: 30-minute one-on-ones with small businesses

• 0900-1330: 30-minute one-on-ones with large businesses

Introductions

Robert Reyes Kevin Adams Contracting Officer Contracting Specialist robert.reyes@us.af.mil kevin.adams.20@us.af.mil

850.883.3748 850.882.4228

Diana Graziano Contract Specialist diana.graziano@us.af.mil 850.882.0083 mailto:Robert.reyes@us.af.mil mailto:kevin.adams.20@us.af.mil mailto:diana.graziano@us.af.mil

• Turn off all cell phones

• Ask questions at any time Minutes will be recorded and questions/answers will be posted to Fedbizops.com Document any questions in writing and submit after presentation

• One-on-one sessions will be 30 minutes long from start to finish—please show up on time Please allow yourself enough time to locate building

349 and find a parking spot Allow for time to scan any electronic media

Rules of Engagement

Industry Day Objectives

• Convey government requirements and contract specifications

• Facilitate open flow of discussion for contract clarifications, enhancements and improvements

• Solicit feedback on preliminary documents and RFP Sections L&M

• Identify a pool of qualified LB/SB vendors

AA ID/IQ Contract Overview

• This AA ID/IQ is a contracting vehicle, not an independent program of record

• Provides rapid execution capability

• Supports short-term efforts to satisfy warfighter needs

• Caters to three primary customers Armament Directorate (AFLCMC/EB) Armament Systems Directorate (AFLCMC/XZW) Special Operations Command (SOCOM Det 1)

• Does not include A&AS

Contract Overview Cont’d…

• 5 year/$490M ceiling

• Multiple award IDIQ effort Currently anticipate 20 awards—depending on quality and quantity of proposals o Anticipate 5-6 small businesses

• Delivery Orders based on LPTA with exceptions Exceptions include sole source and full trade-off

• Initial contract will be awarded to multiple vendors based on:

- Program Management

- Trade Space & Capabilities Studies

- Demonstrations and Tests

- Design & Engineering Support

- Hardware and Software Mods

- Logistics

Contract Criteria

Non-program contract linked to established or potential programs related to armament mission

Related to any of the following:

Design and/or engineering development Fabrication Demonstrations/studies Testing of prototypes Hardware/software modification Data collections and/or analysis in support of demonstrations or development

Contract Description Value

Munitions Effectiveness & Target Vulnerability Analysis $25M

Retrofitted Laser Small Diameter Bomb $18M

Next Generation Penetrator Analysis Tool Developer $ 1M

UCA for BLU-129 Limited Production $26M

Engineering on Standoff Precision Guided Munitions

(SOPGM) $ 6M

Field Permanent SOPGM on MC130W $20M

Air Blast & Ballistic Impact Damage Evaluation $ .8M

Transition of Home on Jammer (HOJ) Tech into AJ=PGM

JCTD $2.7M

AA IDIQ Contract Criteria Previous Contract Examples that Meet AA IDIQ Criteria

Delivery Order Workflow

Draft Section M FACTOR I: Technical/Technical Risk

Subfactor A: Program Management/Technical Approach/Risk/Security

Seven areas of criteria

1. Program Management

2. Trade Space and Capabilities Studies

3. Design and Engineering Development

4. Demonstrations and Tests

5. Hardware and Software Modification

6. Fabrication and Manufacturing

7. Logistics

Subfactor B: Experience

Offeror must provide a relevant and successful example of utilizing their guidance/procedures to produce an outcome in each of the criteria listed in Subfactor A

FACTOR II: Representative Labor Effort (PRICE)

1. Program Management Offeror must demonstrate the ability to execute the following program management functions:

– Plan, estimate, budget, finance, manage cost, allocate resources, meet timelines, make trade-offs, implement subcontract management and a quality management system, and conduct risk management for individual projects to be complete within established schedule and budget.

2. Trade Space and Capabilities Studies Offeror must demonstrate the ability to perform capabilities studies to include:

Defining the problem Developing the analysis plan Gathering & reviewing data Constructing/populating models Hypothesis testing

Criteria in Subfactor A

Running models Analyzing results Developing insights Documenting/briefing results and soliciting feedback

1.Program Management

2.Trade Space & Capabilities Studies

3.Design & Engineering Development

4.Demonstrations & Tests

5.Hardware & Software Modification

6.Fabrication & Manufacturing

7.Logistics

Criteria in Subfactor A Cont’d…

3. Design and Engineering Development Offeror must demonstrate the ability to perform the following functions:

a. Design approaches

b. Validate analytical models

c. Quantify contract technical performance and manufacturing quality

d. Measure progress in a system engineering design and development

e. Minimize technical risks

f. Predict integrated system operational performance

(effectiveness and suitability) in the intended environment

g. Identify system problems (or deficiencies) to allow for early and timely resolution

4. Demonstrations and Tests Offeror must demonstrate the ability to provide essential information to decision-makers, assess attainment of technical performance parameters, and determine whether or not systems are operationally effective, suitable, survivable, and safe for intended use.

5. Hardware and Software Modification Offeror must demonstrate the ability to ensure compatibility, interoperability, and integration of all interfaces between the system and its operating environment, including electrical/electronic and mechanical hardware design and software development.

6.Fabrication and Manufacturing Offeror must demonstrate the ability to:

a.Fabricate complex systems and ensure proper manufacturing planning b.Ensure that the system design will lead to an efficient and economical quantity

c. Track and assess the status of the program to determine if schedule, cost, and quality standards are being met d.Conduct assessments and reviews of the manufacturing effort

7. Logistics Offeror must demonstrate the ability to:

a. Provide sustaining/system engineering for an in-service system in its operational environment(to ensure continued operations and maintenance of the system with managed risk)

b. Decide what is needed to integrate the logistics-related readiness, combat capability, systems commonality, and supportability design parameters into system and equipment design

c. Determine need for, acquire, catalog, receive, store, transfer, issue, package/preserve, handle, store, transport, and disposal/demilitarization of spares, repair parts, supplies, support equipment, and other materials

Measure of Merit for Subfactor A

Program Management: Offeror employs standard and relevant guidance, documents, and products (such as earned value management reports, work breakdown structure [WBS], cost/budget estimates, Integrated Master Schedules [IMSs], milestone charts, monthly acquisition reports, system engineering master plan [SEMP], final reports, preferred supplier agreements, non-disclosure agreements, contracts, acceptance procedures, risk matrices, risk mitigation plans, etc.) which deliver valid, useful measures of merit that provides the Government with insight into the contractor’s cost, schedule and performance progress.

Trade Space and Capabilities Studies: Offeror employs standard and relevant guidance, documents, and products (such as analysis plans, cost-capability curves, monthly status/progress reports, final reports, etc.)

which deliver valid, useful measures of merit that provides the Government with insight into the study option’s cost implications, schedule impacts and predicted system performance.

Design and Engineering Development: Offeror employs standard and relevant guidance, documents, and products (such as SEMP, work plan/schedule, drawing packages, System Requirements Review (SRR)/ System Design Review (SDR)/Preliminary Design Review (PDR)/ Critical Design Review (CDR) progress reviews [functional allocation matrices, timeline analyses, out briefs, reports, minutes, etc.]) which deliver valid, useful measures of merit that provides the Government with insight into the contractor’s cost, schedule and performance progress.

Demonstration and Tests: Offeror employs standard and relevant guidance, documents, and products (such as test plans, test reports, data analysis plans, test run cards, etc.) which deliver valid, useful measures of merit that provides the Government with insight into the contractor’s cost progress, schedule and performance.

Measure of Merit for Subfactor A (cont.)

Hardware and Software Modification: Offeror employs standard and relevant guidance, documents and products (such as interface control documents [ICDs], work plans/schedule, drawing packages, Preliminary Design Review (PDR)/Critical Design Review (CDR) progress reviews [out briefs, reports, minutes], etc.)

which deliver valid, useful measures of merit that provides the Government with insight into the contractor’s cost progress, schedule and performance.

Fabrication and Manufacturing: Offeror employs standard and relevant guidance, documents and products (such as manufacturing readiness assessments [MRAs], manufacturability studies, assembly plans/instructions, plant layouts, quality control plans, manufacturing plans, progress reports, producibility analyses, production reports, etc.) which deliver valid, useful measures of merit that provides the Government with insight into the contractor’s cost, schedule and performance progress.

Logistics: Offeror employs standard and relevant guidance, documents and products (such as a Life Cycle Sustainment Plan, source of repair assignment process [SORAP] report, obsolescence studies, plans, monthly status/progress reports, analyses, requirements, study reports, built-in-test [BIT] requirements analyses, maintenance plans, maintenance and inspection schedules, technical orders [TOs], etc.) which deliver valid, useful measures of merit providing the Government with insight into the contractor’s cost progress, schedule and performance.

Offeror must provide a relevant and successful example of utilizing their guidance/procedures to produce an outcome in each of the criteria listed in Subfactor A

1.Experience

Criteria in Subfactor B

Draft Section M: Factor II

FACTOR II: Representative Labor Effort (PRICE)

A pricing model will be provided for offerors to input fully burdened rates for a limited list of representative labor categories. Offerors should input a realistic competitive value.

FY14 AA ID/IQ Milestones

The planning dates below are subject to change:

Industry Day 28-29 Jul 14 Draft RFP 20-Aug-14 Issue Synopsis 30-Aug-14 Issue RFP 17-Sep-14 Oral Proposals 24-Oct-14 Evaluate Proposals 5-Dec-14 Discussions (if needed) Jan – Mar 15 Source Selection Decision Doc 17-May-15 SSA Decision 9-Jun-15 Contract Award 10-Jul-15

Industry Day 2014

Questions?