RFP_Attachment_4_-_PPQ.doc

DOC document 69 KB Posted

Attached to
Guardian Angel Air Deployable Rescue Vehicle Post Block 1 Upgrade Validation Testing
Solicitation number
FA8629-17-R-5004
Issued by

About this file

From the source

Attachment 4 - PPQ

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Q&A_21_March_2017.pdf PDF
Tab_12_-_RFP_Attachment_1_-_SOW_21_Mar_2017.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachment_3_-_CDRLs.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachment_2_-_GFP.pdf PDF
RFP_Attachment_1_-_SOW_10_Mar_2017.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation – Please return not later than 12:00 Noon Eastern Time, 3 April 2017.

Dear Sir/Madam:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a contract with the United States Air Force.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, you may contact the following individuals, or the undersigned at 937-656-8201, or Christopher.hinders.1@us.af.mil.

Past Performance Questionnaire Alternate Points of Contact:

Amber Taylor

Amber.taylor.9@us.af.mil 937-656-8463

Joni Dingledine

Joni.dingledine@us.af.mil

937-656-8204

//signed//

Christopher M. Hinders

Contracting Officer

AFLCMC/WISK

Wright-Patterson AFB, OH

1 Atch

Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

A. GENERAL INFORMATION

Contractor’s Name:

Address: __________________________

Telephone Number:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work:

Contract Number:

Contract Value:

* If contract value changed during the course of performance for a reason other than option exercise, please explain the reason for the change: ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Contract Period or Dates of Performance:

Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor

B.

RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: ___________________________ Title:

Address: _____________________

Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________

Fax Number:

Email Address:

B. FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO THE GOVERNMENT AT:

937-656-9088, or via email to the POC’s listed above.

D.

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 1 to 6 that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF 1 OR 2.

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNSATISFACTORY
MARGINAL
SATISFACTORY
VERY GOOD
EXCEPTIONAL
NEUTRAL
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded many to the government’s benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.
No record of past performance or the record is inconclusive.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ________________________ CONTRACT NUMBER________________

The contractor:

1.
Provided trained and experienced personnel needed to meet contract requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
6
2.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
1
2
3
4
5
6
3.
Demonstrated the ability to manage Government Furnished Property (GFP).
1
2
3
4
5
6
4.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies
1
2
3
4
5
6
5.
Identified problems as they occurred.
1
2
3
4
5
6
6.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
1
2
3
4
5
6
8.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
1
2
3
4
5
6
9.
Met established project schedules.
1
2
3
4
5
6
10.
Was responsive to contract changes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
11.
Provided adequate project supervision.
1
2
3
4
5
6
12.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
1
2
3
4
5
6
13.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
1
2
3
4
5
6
14.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
1
2
3
4
5
6
15.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

16.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

17.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?

YES/NO

Remarks:_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .