RFI_preaward_2.docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8601-18-R-0016
About this file
Answer to Request for Information (RFI) 2 concerning Loop Detector quantities.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Call_Sheet_airfiled_IDIQ_BLDG_93.pdf | ||
| RFP_SF30_Addendum_3.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_5.2_Wage_Determination_OH20180002.pdf | ||
| Drawings_BLDG_93-SHT1.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5.2_Wage_Determination_OH20180002.pdf | ||
| Final_SF30_Addendum_2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_5_update_Wage_Dtermination_OH20170002.pdf | ||
| Addendum_1_Loop_Detectors_to_ZHTV171101_AFP_IDIQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| 171101_bid_schedule_option_1_(Addendum).docx | DOCX document | |
| 171101_bid_schedule_option_2_(Addendum).docx | DOCX document | |
| 171101_bid_schedule_base_year_(addendum).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_6_Drawings.pdf | ||
| RFP_Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFP_Draft_v2.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_2_Bid_schedule_option_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_1_bid_schedule_base_year.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_5_Wage_Determination_OH20170002.pdf | ||
| Attachment_4_Specifications_Project_171101(IDIQ).docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_3_Bid_schedule_option_2.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Pre-award RFI 2
FA8601-18-R-0016
Airfield Paving and Maintenance IDIQ
RFI 2 Question: The quantity of Loop Detectors on the Base Year Bid Line Item 0001BF states “1 ea,” but the quantity for the same bid line item on Option Year 1 and 2’s Loop Detector is “2 ea.” Are the quantities for Loop Protectors supposed to mirror each other between the Base and Option Years (as do every other Bid Line Item), and if so, is the quantity supposed to be 1 or 2 ea.?
RFI 2 Answer: The quantities are not required to mirror each other from one year to the next, although they typically do for simplicity. In this case, the pavements engineers implied that this CLIN was going to be needed less in the first year, so only 1 was included.
File details come from the government source that posted it.