DRAFT Attachment_5_FACTS_Sheet.doc

RFP FA8552-22-R-0005

DRAFT ATTACHMENT 5

FACTS Sheet

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

Controlled Unclassified Information Present/Past Performance “FACTS Sheet”

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR AND JOINT VENTURE MEMBER)

Request the offeror/joint venture member, complete a separate FACTS Sheet for each relevant contract. See Clause L-900 of this RFP for detailed instructions and limits on number and recency of contracts. Offeror/joint venture member/ is requested to provide frank, concise comments regarding present/past performance on the program identified in B. below.

If the contract being submitted is an ordering type contractual vehicle (for example, including but not limited to an Indefinite Delivery “D” type contract per FAR 16.5), only after issuance of a delivery/task order does performance occur. The Contract Number, Total Contract Dollar Value, Period of Performance, and Type and Complexity of Data Deliverable submitted here should be for the order or series of orders, the offeror has performed under this ordering type contractual vehicle.

If a series of orders is being submitted, the offeror shall include a list that includes the order numbers, each order’s Total Contract Dollar Value, each order’s Period of Performance, each order’s, and the Type and Complexity of Data Deliverables on each order. If the series of orders contains more than 5 orders, include this information on a separate attachment. See Section L-900 Paragraph II. D for more information on proposal submission and Section M-900 Paragraph II. D.3 for evaluation information.

A. OFFEROR:

(1) Name (Company/Division)

(2) Address

(2) CAGE Code B. PROGRAM/PROJECT TITLE and CONTRACT NUMBER:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Basic Contract Number and each Order Number or Order Number within the a Series of Orders)

C. Role of the Offeror In Effort: __________ Prime Contractor __________ Subcontractor NOTE: The information provided in the FACTS Sheet shall reflect the role that the offeror/joint venture member performed in the effort, i.e. an offeror who performed as a subcontractor shall identify the contract type, dollar value, description, etc. of its subcontract with the prime contractor.

D. NAME OF CONTRACTING ACTIVITY OR CUSTOMER:

E. CONTRACT TYPE(S) – CHECK ALL THAT APPLY

a. Firm Fixed Price

b. Time and Materials

c. Cost

d. Other (Explain)

F. TOTAL CONTRACT DOLLAR VALUE: (If you performed work as a subcontractor, identify your total contract dollar value and the PRIME’s total contract dollar value, if known. Describe any changes in dollar value that may have occurred from time of contract award to the conclusion of the effort or the present, whichever is applicable.)If submitting an Ordering Type Contract, list the Original and Current Total Contract Dollar Values, for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders. If your series of orders consists of more than 5 individual orders include the information in a separate attachment.

1. Original Total Contract Dollar Value:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Original Total Contract Dollar Value for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

2. Current Total Contact Dollar Value:

(If submitting Ordering Type Contract: List the Current Total Contract Dollar Value for each Order or Order within the Series of Orders)

3. Explain the differences in Total Contract Value, if applicable: Enter an explanation of the difference between the Original Total Contract Dollar Value and the Current Total Contract Dollar Value as of the time of proposal submission.

4. If Award Fee Contract, what percentages of the fee have been awarded in each of last 3 years?

G. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: (includes start and end dates, i.e. Jan 2004 – Dec 2007)

If submitting an Ordering Type Contract, the “Period of Performance” submitted here should be for the order (or series of orders), the offeror has performed under this ordering type contractual vehicle. The offeror shall submit the “Start Date” for the individual order or the first order in the series. The offeror shall submit the “Original End Date” for the individual order or the last order in the series. If the “End Date” on the individual order or last order within the series of orders has changed, these changes would need to be reflected in the “Current End Date” Section below. Also, if submitting a series of orders, list the Start Date, Original End Date and Current End Date for each order. If your series of orders consists of more than 5 individual orders include the information in a separate attachment.

1. Start Date: Input start date of contract/order/series of orders.

2. Original End Date: Input original end date of contract/order/series of orders based on award.

3. Current End Date (if changed): Input end date, as the contract/order/series of orders stands at time of proposal submission.

H. Type and Complexity of Data Deliverables:

Include the type and complexities of data deliverables for each contract/order/series or orders. If more than 5 orders are in the series of orders, include the information in a separate attachment.

J. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EFFORT:

1. As a part of this narrative description, highlight portions considered most relevant to the current acquisition; addressing how and to what extent the proposed effort relates to the program identified in B. above. To supplement the data provided in response to this paragraph, complete the following regarding relevancy of the effort identified in paragraph B to the proposed effort. This is limited to two pages beyond the page limitation of the FACTS sheet information.

2. This paragraph shall also include details to support the offeror’s record for on-time delivery, technical quantity and cost control for this effort identified in paragraph B. above.

PAST PERFORMANCE RELEVANCY TABLE

(To be Completed by Offeror/Joint Venture Member)

(Complete for each effort identified for evaluation in the Past Performance Volume III)

Request the offeror/joint venture member (as applicable) complete a separate Relevancy Table for each effort identified for evaluation in the Past Performance Volume III. This table, in addition to the information provided by the offeror in the Past Performance Volume III, will assist the PCO in evaluating the relevancy of the proposed effort to the instant requirements. Offerors/joint venture members shall only complete column three. Offerors’/joint venture members’ answers are applicable only to the efforts identified in the Past Performance Volume III, not the offeror’s proposed solutions to the instant effort. Please be as specific as possible with the fill-in information provided.

Contractor:

Cage Code:

Contract Number:

Program Title:

Contractor Agency/Customer:

Complete all rows that apply to the effort identified above.

(GOVT has completed this column)

(DO NOT CHANGE)

Fill-in for the Effort Identified Above (Offeror/joint venture member)

The effort above required:

OR

Served as SME for helicopter and HUMS; used HUMS systems for CBM support on military helicopters

OR

Served as SME for HUMS; used HUMS systems for CBM support on military or commercial helicopters.

OR

Developed engineering tools to satisfy airworthiness requirements for helicopter fleet management

Developed engineering tools to provide insight into helicopter fleet management

OR

Developed and delivered local desktop HUMS data analysis software used by fleet managers or field maintainers

Developed and delivered local desktop HUMS data analysis software for use by fleet managers or field maintainers

OR

Served as support in RMF process for military-fielded HUMS Ground Stations

Served as support in RMF process for military-fielded HUMS Ground Stations or commercial equivalent to RMF process for HUMS Ground Stations.

OR

Successfully modified HUMS onboard system software configuration for military or commercial helicopter and performed lab testing

Successfully modified HUMS onboard system software configuration for military or commercial helicopter

3. If you are small business, or, if you are a large business and a Small Business Subcontracting Plan per FAR 52.219-9 was NOT required by this effort, indicate your compliance with FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, by completing the following. That is, when subcontracting possibilities existed on this effort, did you award subcontracts to small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance? If FAR 52.219-8 was NOT included in this effort, whenever subcontracting possibilities existed in the performance of this effort, address whether or not it was your policy to utilize small business concerns, veteran-owned small business concerns, service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns, HUBZone small business concerns, small disadvantaged business concerns, and women-owned small business concerns to the fullest extent consistent with efficient contract performance.

No subcontracting possibilities

In compliance

Not in compliance (address why)

K. PRIMARY POINTS OF CONTACT: (The offeror/joint venture member is responsible for exerting its best efforts to ensure that current information is provided for at least two of the following individuals.)

L. Use this space to address any aspect about this program considered unique. Describe quality awards or certifications that indicate the offeror possesses a high-quality process for developing and producing the product/service required.

M. Summarize contract issues relative to the number and severity of quality deficiencies recorded/contract discrepancy reports issued, cure notices, show cause letters, termination for default or cause, disputes, claims, latent defects; and, corrective actions taken for the contract listed in paragraph B. above.

N. Additionally, for those efforts where you are cognizant of unfavorable and/or marginal past performance ratings/reports previously assessed by customers or clients, but feel that significant progress has been made but not yet credited or formally documented, provide the program name, contract number, customer location and a narrative explaining "fixes" made to date, or any other information regarding the unfavorable/marginal assessment. This narrative portion is limited to one (1) additional page beyond the FACTS sheet required page limitation. It is not presumed that performance has been perfect. Rather, the proposal should contain evidence of the offeror's/joint venture member’s ability to isolate the root causes of problems and should describe programs or actions taken to resolve those causes. Demonstrated corrective actions (not just planned or promised), and the overall work record will be considered. Problems not addressed, but found by the Government during the evaluation of the information in this volume, will be assumed to still exist. Note: In the case of Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS), if your input has already been provided and the rationale/ circumstances have not changed, DO NOT repeat them here.

O. Was this contract effort (as identified in paragraph B. above) submitted as a past performance source of data for a previous WR-ALC procurement. Yes No . If yes, identify the buyer and/or contracting officer, their phone number and office symbol and solicitation number of the procurement for which this effort was submitted.

PLEASE NOTE: The Government is not bound by the offeror's opinion of relevancy. The Government will perform an independent assessment of relevancy of the data provided or obtained.

SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

CONTROLLED UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION