TUN_FY13_CDRL_X004_NCIS.pdf

CONTRACT DATA REQUIREMENTS LIST

(1 Data Item)

Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 110 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA. 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503. Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send completed form to the Government Issuing Contracting Officer for Contract/PR No. listed in Block E.

A. CONTRACT LINE ITEM NO. B. EXHIBIT C. CATEGORY:

D. SYSTEM/ITEM E. CONTRACT/PR NO. F. CONTRACTOR

TUNNER LOADER

1. DATA ITEM NO. 2. TITLE OF DATA ITEM 3. SUBTITLE 17. PRICE GROUP

X004

ENGINEERING EVALUATION REPORT

Nuclear Certification Impact Statement (NCIS)

NA

4. AUTHORITY (Data Acquisition Document No.) 5. CONTRACT REFERENCE 6. REQUIRING OFFICE 18. ESTIMATED

TOTAL PRICE

DI-NUOR-81411/T PES PWS 4.2.6.2 AFLCMC/WNZDA NSP

7. DD 250 REQ 9.DIST STATEMENT

REQUIRED

10. FREQUENCY 12. DATE OF FIRST

SUBMISSION

14. DISTRIBUTION

LT

QRTLY SEE BLK 16

b. COPIES

8. APP CODE C 11. AS OF DATE 13. DATE OF SUBSEQUENT

SUBMISSION

a. ADDRESSEE

Draft Final

SEE BLK 16 SEE BLK 16

Reg Repro

16. REMARKS:

Blk 4: DI-NUOR-81411 is tailored in accordance with Attachment

1. The NCIS checklist to determine if there is an impact to the nuclear certification of the Tunner is in attachment 2. The NCIS evaluation process is explained in attachment 3 and must be followed.

Blk 8: The Government shall have 45 days after receipt by AFLCMC/WNZDA to approve each submission. If disapproval is not received by the contractor within 45 days after receipt by AFLCMC/WNZDA, approval shall be automatic.

Blk 9: Distribution Statement C: Distribution is authorized to U.S.

Government agencies and their contractors (administrative or operational use) (5 May 11). Other requests for this document shall be referred to AFLCMC/WNZDA.

Blks 11, 12, 13: The first quarter begins on the first day of the contract period, and the quarterly reports are due within 30 days after each quarter ends. If there were no changes to the engineering drawings during the quarter, a negative reply is required.

Blk 14: The report shall be delivered electronically through email, on a compact disc (CD), or other agreed upon media.

AFLCMC/WNZDA

235 BYRON STREET SUITE 19A

Robins AFB GA 31098-1813

AFLCMC/WNZDA

DCMA

15. TOTAL

G. PREPARED BY H. DATE I. APPROVED BY J. DATE

Rick Holmes

AFLCMC/WNZDA

DD Form 1423-1, 1 Jun 90

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING DD FORM 1423

(See DoD 5010.12-M for detailed instructions)

FOR GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL FOR THE CONTRACTOR

ITEM A. Self-explanatory.

ITEM B. Self-explanatory.

ITEM C. Mark (X) appropriate category: TDP - Technical Data Package; TM - Technical Manual; Other - other category of data, such as "Provisioning," "Configuration Management", etc.

ITEM D. Enter name of system/item being acquired that data will support.

ITEM E. Self-explanatory (to be filled in after contract award).

ITEM F. Self-explanatory (to be filled in after contract award).

ITEM G. Signature of preparer of CDRL.

ITEM H. Date CDRL was prepared.

ITEM I. Signature of CDRL approving authority.

ITEM 1. See DoD FAR Supplement Subpart 4.71 for proper numbering.

ITEM 2. Enter title as it appears on data acquisition document cited in Item 4.

ITEM 3. Enter subtitle of data item for further definition of data item (optional entry).

ITEM 4. Enter Data Item Description (DID) number, military specification number, or military standard number listed in DoD 5010.12-L (AMSDL), or one-time DID number, that defines data content and format requirements.

ITEM 5. Enter reference to tasking in contract that generated requirement for the data item (e.g., Statement of Work paragraph number).

ITEM 6. Enter technical office responsible for ensuring adequacy of the data item.

ITEM 7. Specify requirement for inspection/acceptance of the data item by the Government.

ITEM 8. Specify the requirement for approval of a draft before preparation of the final data item.

ITEM 9. For technical data, specify requirement for contractor to mark the appropriate distribution statement on the data (ref.

DODD 5230.24

ITEM 10. Specify number of times data items are to be delivered.

ITEM 11. Specify as-of date of data item, when applicable.

ITEM 12. Specify when first submittal is required.

ITEM 13. Specify when subsequent submittals are required, when applicable.

ITEM 14. Enter addresses and number of draft/final copies to be delivered to each addressee. Explain reproducible copies in Item 16.

ITEM 15. Enter total number of draft/final copies to be delivered.

ITEM 16. Use for additional/clarifying information for Items 1 through 15. Examples are: Tailoring of documents cited in Item 4; Clarification of submittal dates in Items 12 and 13; Explanation of reproducible copies in Item 14; Desired medium for delivery of the data item.

ITEM 17. Specify appropriate price group from one of the following groups of effort in developing estimated prices for each data item listed on the DD Form 1423.

a. Group I. Definition - Data which is not otherwise essential to the contractor's performance of the primary contracted effort (production, development, testing, and administration) but which is required by DD Form 1423.

Estimated Price - Costs to be included under Group I are those applicable to preparing and assembling the data item in conformance with Government requirements, and the administration and other expenses related to reproducing and delivering such data items to the Government.

b. Group II. Definition - Data which is essential to the performance of the primary contracted effort by the contractor is required to perform additional work to conform to Government requirements with regard to depth of content, format, frequency of submittal, preparation, control, or quality of the data item.

Estimated Price - Costs to be included under Group II are those incurred over and above the cost of the essential data item without conforming to Government requirements, and the administrative and other expenses related to reproducing and

c. Group III. Definition - Data which the contractor must develop for his internal use in performance of the primary contracted effort and does not require any substantial change to conform to Government requirements with regard to depth of content, format, frequency of submittal, preparation, control, and quality of the data item.

Estimated Price - Costs to be included under Group III are the administrative and other expenses related to reproducing and

d. Group IV. Definition - Data which is developed by the contractor as part of his normal operating procedures and his effort in supplying this data to the Government is minimal.

Estimated Price - Group IV items should normally be shown on the DD Form 1423 at no cost.

ITEM 18. For each data item, enter an amount equal to that portion of the total price which is estimated to be attributable to the production or development for the Government of that item of data. These estimated data prices should be developed only from those costs which will be incurred as a direct result of the requirement to supply the data, over and above those costs which would otherwise be incurred in performance of the contract if no data were required. The estimated data prices shall not include any amount for rights in data. The Government's right to use the data shall be governed by the pertinent provisions of the contract.

DD Form 1423, JUN 90 (REVERSE) (EF)

Date: 15 Jul 2011 Attachment 1 for CDRL X004

Engineering Evaluation Report, Nuclear Certification Impact Statement (NCIS) Tailoring of Data Item Description (DID) DI-NUOR-81411

Blk 3: Delete in its entirety and substitute: “This report documents the nuclear certification impact review of all product and hardware changes.”

Blk 7: Delete 7.1 and 7.2, and substitute: “This DID contains the format and content requirements for the nuclear certification evaluation Summary and NCIS Template.”

Blk 10: Delete 10.2.1, 10.2.2, 10.2.3, and 10.2.4, and substitute:

“10.2.1 Summary. Summarize the nuclear certification evaluation of the loader changes for the quarter. Include an overall statement of what was done; number of changes evaluated; number of changes applicable to nuclear certification, i.e., “yes” answers per the checklist; attach the NCIS checklist(s) and attach NCIS(s) (if applicable).

10.2.2 Nuclear Certification Impact Statement Template. Use this template to generate an NCIS and attach to the Summary (10.2.1) when the Attachment 2 checklist indicates the change is applicable by the selection of “yes” for any of the checklist questions.

(Contractor’s Name) Nuclear Certification Impact Statement Date: DD/MM/YY

Nomenclature: Truck, Aircraft Cargo, Loading-Unloading Type A/S 32H-23 Official Nickname: Tunner Stock Number: 3930-01-409-0339CT Part Number: Part Number of the part being changed.

Background: A brief description of the current situation/problem being addressed by the change. Include references to applicable documentation of this issue.

Engineering Change Description: Short narrative of the change (note: one change per NCIS) and the reason for making the change

Engineering Change Evaluation: The intent of this review process is to ensure that a proposed change does not negatively impact the Tunner Nuclear Certification. The Engineering Change Evaluation process utilizes 16 primary group and 131 secondary sub-group questions to facilitate the review process. An affirmative answer to any of these questions means the change is applicable to the nuclear certification and; therefore, requires an explanation as to why the proposed change does or does not impact the nuclear certification and is contained and documented in the NCIS Checklist Review. A summary of the evaluation, i.e., analysis, checklist review, etc., shall be included here; include a reference to the attached NCIS checklist here.

Conclusion: A brief conclusion statement.

Submitted by:

Engineer: Signature and Date

Engineering Supervisor: Signature and Date

Attachment: NCIS checklist”.

Attachment 2 for CDRL X004 NCIS Checklist Template Dated 15 Jul 11 MM/DD/YY

Change Order/Part Number: Enter the change order number and part number of the part being changed here. This NCIS Checklist utilizes 16 Primary group and 131 Secondary sub-group questions to facilitate the review process. An affirmative answer to any Primary group question requires answering the Secondary sub-group questions. Any Secondary sub-group questions answered “Yes” requires an explanation as to why the proposed change does or does not impact the nuclear certification. Any Primary group question answered “No” does not require that its Secondary sub-group questions be answered.

Question Group: 1 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.2.3, 3.3 and all sub par, 3.4, and 3.6.1 A/F Criticality Frame Support

Class Notes This requirement ensures that the nuclear weapon is supported by the basic frame of the equipment. Only needs to be considered, or re-analyzed, if the lifting hydraulics, hydraulic circuit or loader structural elements are redesigned or have major modifications made to them.

Key Applicable Question: Rationale:

1000 Yes Are there proposed changes to the loader structural elements, lifting hydraulics, or suspension hydraulics?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1000

1001 Yes Will any of the deck structure be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1001

1002 Yes Will any of the chassis structure be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1002

1003 Yes Are there proposed changes to the geometry of the lift linkages?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1003

1004 Yes Will any of the structural elements of the lift linkages be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1004

1005 Yes Are there proposed changes to the geometry of the suspension system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1005

1006 Yes Will any of the structural elements of the suspension system be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1006

1007 Yes Are there proposed changes to the lift cylinders?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1007

1008 Yes Are there proposed changes to the hydraulic fluid lines that raise and lower the deck?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1008

1009 Yes Are there proposed changes to the suspension cylinders?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1009

1010 Yes Are there proposed changes to the hydraulic fluid lines that extend and retract the suspension cylinders?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1010

1011 Yes Are there proposed changes to the hydraulic lift manifold or associated valves?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1011

1012 Yes Are there proposed changes to the hydraulic suspension manifold or associated valves?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1012

1013 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 1 Question Key 1013

Question Group: 2 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.6.2 A/F Criticality Static Grounding

Class Notes Provide grounding provisions to prevent static electrical discharge through the nuclear weapon

2000 Yes Are there proposed changes to the Tunner grounding straps or cables?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 2 Question Key 2000

2001 Yes Are there proposed changes to the grounding cable between the cab and the deck?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 2 Question Key 2001

2002 Yes Are there proposed changes to the grounding cable between the deck and the chassis?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 2 Question Key 2002

2003 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 2 Question Key 2003

Question Group: 3 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.6.3 A/F Criticality Fire Propagation Potential

Class Notes Minimize the potential for fire propagation due to electrical or fuel system failure

3000 Yes Are there proposed changes to the Emergency pump, alternator and charging system, circuit breakers, fuses, fire extinguishers, fuel, engine oil, or hydraulic lines and fittings?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 3 Question Key 3000

3001 Yes Are there proposed changes to the Emergency pump?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 3 Question Key 3001

3002 Yes Are there proposed changes to the alternator and/or charging system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 3 Question Key 3002

3003 Yes Are there proposed changes to any circuit breakers or fuses?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 3 Question Key 3003

3004 Yes Will the number of fire extinguisher(s) be reduced?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 3 Question Key 3004

3005 Yes Are there proposed changes to the location of the fire extinguisher(s)?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 3 Question Key 3005

3006 Yes Are there proposed changes to fuel, engine oil, or hydraulic lines or fittings?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 3 Question Key 3006

3007 Yes Are there proposed changes to the installation processes for fuel, engine oil, or hydraulic lines or fittings?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 3 Question Key 3007

3008 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 3 Question Key 3008

Question Group: 4 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.2.3, 3.3 and all sub par, 3.4, 3.6.1 and 3.6.4 A/F Criticality Shock Isolation

Class Notes Design the equipment to minimize mechanical shock transmission to a nuclear weapon

4000 Yes Are there proposed changes to the parts of the deck structure, deck lift mechanism, deck roll mechanism, deck side shift/yaw mechanism, chassis structure, suspension system, or hydraulic system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4000

4001 Yes Will the deck structure be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0, or either factor of safety changed by more than 0.2?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4001

4002 Yes Will any of the chassis structure be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0, or either factor of safety changed by more than 0.2?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4002

4003 Yes Are there proposed changes to the geometry of the lift linkages?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4003

4004 Yes Are there proposed changes to the geometry of the suspension system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4004

4005 Yes Will any of the structural elements of the lift linkage be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0, or either factor of safety changed by more than 0.2?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4005

4006 Yes Will any of the structural elements of the suspension system be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0, or either factor of safety changed by more than 0.2?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4006

4007 Yes Are there proposed changes to the lift cylinders?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4007

4008 Yes Are there proposed changes to the suspension cylinders?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4008

4009 Yes Are there proposed changes to the tires used on the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4009

4010 Yes Are there proposed changes to the hydraulic deck lift, side shift/yaw, roll, or suspension circuits (valves, manifolds, actuators, or fluid lines)?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4010

4011 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 4 Question Key 4011

Question Group: 5 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.2.3, 3.3 and all sub par, 3.4, and 3.6.5 A/F Criticality RESTRAINTS. Integrity of deck pallet stops and pallet locks

Class Notes Ensure that the restraint provisions for ground transport of all nuclear weapons are capable of restraining the design load, as defined in section 3.2.3.

5000 Yes Are there proposed changes to the components, or parts of the pallet stop systems or the pallet lock assemblies?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 5 Question Key 5000

5001 Yes Are there proposed changes to the pallet stop system geometry?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 5 Question Key 5001

5002 Yes Are there proposed changes to the processes used to fabricate and assemble the pallet stop system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 5 Question Key 5002

5003 Yes Will the pallet stop system be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 5 Question Key 5003

5004 Yes Are there proposed changes to any part of the pallet lock assembly?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 5 Question Key 5004

5005 Yes Are there proposed changes to the processes used to fabricate and assemble the pallet lock assembly system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 5 Question Key 5005

5006 Yes Will the pallet lock assembly be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 5 Question Key 5006

5007 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 5 Question Key 5007

Question Group: 6 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.2.3, 3.3 and all sub par, 3.4, and 3.6.5 A/F Criticality RESTRAINTS. Integrity of deck pallet tie downs

Class Notes Ensure that the restraint provisions for ground transport of all nuclear weapons are capable of restraining the design load, as defined in section 3.2.3.

6000 Yes Are there proposed changes to any of the components, or parts, of the "tie down system"?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 6 Question Key 6000

6001 Yes Are there proposed changes to the "tie down system" geometry?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 6 Question Key 6001

6002 Yes Are there proposed changes to the processes used to fabricate and assemble any of the components or parts of the "tie down system"?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 6 Question Key 6002

6003 Yes Will the "tie down system" be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 6 Question Key 6003

6004 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 6 Question Key 6004

Question Group: 7 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.6.6 A/F Criticality Engine-Transmission Interlock

Class Notes Ensure the engine start switch will operate only when the clutch is disengaged or the automatic transmission is in the "neutral" or "park" position

7000 Yes Are there proposed changes to the engine start interlock system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 7 Question Key 7000

7001 Yes Are there proposed changes to the interlock wiring between the start switch and neutral position on the drive selector?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 7 Question Key 7001

7002 Yes Are there proposed changes to the interlock wiring between the start switch, the parking brake, and the neutral position on the drive selector?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 7 Question Key 7002

7003 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 7 Question Key 7003

Question Group: 8 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.6.7 A/F Criticality Brakes

Class Notes The Tunner must have a parking brake designed to hold the fully loaded equipment on an 11.5 degree incline when headed either up or down and incline

8000 Yes Are there proposed changes to any of the components or parts of the brake system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 8 Question Key 8000

8001 Yes Are there proposed changes to the brake system geometry?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 8 Question Key 8001

8002 Yes Are there proposed changes to the brake system hydraulics or pneumatics?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 8 Question Key 8002

8003 Yes Are there proposed changes to the processes used to fabricate any of the brake system components?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 8 Question Key 8003

8004 Yes Are there proposed changes to the parking brake?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 8 Question Key 8004

8005 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 8 Question Key 8005

Question Group: 9 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.6.8 A/F Criticality Stability

Class Notes Ensure the Tunner does not have an unsafe tendency to tip, tilt, yaw, sway, skid, or jackknife when loaded under the worst case conditions and undergoing maximum performance maneuvers

9000 Yes Will the change affect loader stability (height settings and reach, deceleration rates, wind loading)?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 9 Question Key 9000

9001 Yes Will the suspension height setting be raised above 43 inches?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 9 Question Key 9001

9002 Yes Will the maximum height to which the deck can be raised increase to a value greater than 18 feet 6 inches?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 9 Question Key 9002

9003 Yes Are there proposed changes which allow the loader to decelerate at a rate higher than 7.52 feet per second squared with a 60,000 pound load on the deck?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 9 Question Key 9003

9004 Yes Are there proposed changes to the tires?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 9 Question Key 9004

9005 Yes Will the specified wind loading capability on the Tunner be affected by the change?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 9 Question Key 9005

9006 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 9 Question Key 9006

Question Group: 10 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.6.9 A/F Criticality Mobility

Class Notes Comply with the mobility requirements in F3I specification SP1-9032950. (The capability of a military weapons system to move over a specified terrain while retaining the ability to fulfill its primary mission(s).)

10000 Yes Will the change affect loader steering or suspension systems?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10000

10001 Yes Are there proposed changes to the steering members?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10001

10002 Yes Are there proposed change

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10002

10003 Yes Are there proposed changes to the steering hydraulics?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10003

10004 Yes Are there proposed changes to the processes used to fabricate the steering members?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10004

10005 Yes Will any part of the steering system be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10005

10006 Yes Are there proposed changes to the geometry of the suspension system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10006

10007 Yes Will any of the structural elements of the suspension system be modified so that the static factor of safety is less than 3.0 or the dynamic factor of safety is less than 2.0?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10007

10008 Yes Are there proposed changes to the suspension cylinders?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10008

10009 Yes Are there proposed changes to the suspension hydraulic circuit (valves, manifold, and fluid lines)?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10009

10010 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 10 Question Key 10010

Question Group: 11 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.6.10 A/F Criticality Identification plates

Class Notes Identify the rated load and gross vehicle weight of the Tunner on its identification plate

11000 Yes Are there proposed changes to information on data plate 9627116-5?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 11 Question Key 11000

11001 Yes Will the rated load be changed from 60,000 pounds?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 11 Question Key 11001

11002 Yes Will the gross vehicle weight be changed from 126,000 pounds?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 11 Question Key 11002

11003 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 11 Question Key 11003

Question Group: 12 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.6.12 A/F Criticality Adverse Environments

Class Notes Demonstrate the Tunner's ability to operate safely in the most adverse environments (as specified in the F3I specification SP1-9032950). Demonstration for purposes of the NCIS checklist shall be by analysis or similarity.

12000 Yes After the modifications or changes proposed by this CO, do any of the parts NOT meet the environmental requirements for temperature, altitude, acceleration loads during transport, humidity, rain, dust, blowing sand, salt fog, wind, snow, sleet, sand, mud, electromagnetic, sound, nuclear, chemical, and biological?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12000

12001 Yes Temperature: -40 deg F to +125 deg F (operation); -60 deg F to + 160 deg F (storage).

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12001

12002 Yes Altitude: 0 to 5,000 ft Mean Sea Level (MSL). Starting ability at cold temperature is marginal from 2,750 to 5,000 ft MSL for temperatures of -32 to -25 deg F and from 0 to 2,750 for temperatures from -40 to -25 deg F. Starting is unlikely from 2,750 to 5,000 ft MSL for temperatures of -40 to -32 deg F.

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12002

12003 Yes Acceleration during transport: -2.0 g to +4.5 g Normal (vertical); -1.5 g to +1.5 g Lateral; -3.0 g to +1.5 g Longitudinal.

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12003

12004 Yes Humidity: 0 to 100%

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12004

12005 Yes Rain: 13 cm/hr, 5% of the time.

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12005

12006 Yes Salt fog/Salt spray: 5% solution with fallout rate of 2.0ml/80 cm^2/hr.

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12006

12007 Yes Dust: blowing velocity of 1750 ft/min at a concentration of 0.5g/cu. ft., 5% of the time.

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12007

12008 Yes Blowing sand: Blowing velocity of 4,050 ft/min. at a concentration of .0773g/cu. ft., 5% of the time.

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12008

12009 Yes Wind: 0 to 40 knots.

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12009

12010 Yes Snow, sleet, sand, and mud: 0 to 1 inch on tractive surface.

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12010

12011 Yes Electromagnetic: Does not generate electromagnetic emissions that interfere with aircraft systems or other equipment. The loader shall not be susceptible to electromagnetic emissions from aircraft and other equipment. The loader shall be designed to comply with the requirements of MIL-STD-461, Class C1, Group II for electromagnetic interference (emissions and susceptibility), except that the limits for UM03 (Figure 8-1 of MIL-STD-461) shall be relaxed by 20 dB

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12011

12012 Yes Nuclear/Chemical/Biological: The exterior surfaces of the loader (other than the walkways) shall be as smooth as possible to prevent biological and chemical agents from collecting. Finishes shall facilitate decontamination through current decontamination practices.

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12012

12013 Yes Sound: The loader shall comply to AFOSHSTD 48-19, Hazardous Noise Exposure. Single ear hearing protection device (HPD) IAW Chapter 5 AFOSHA 48-19 31 March 1994 is permissible.

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12013

12014 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 12 Question Key 12014

Question Group: 13 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.11.1 A/F Criticality Lift systems Class Notes Design the lift system so it maintains safe control of the rated load if electrical, hydraulic, or pneumatic system failure occurs. Include pressure relief valves or regulators in hydraulic and pneumatic systems to prevent overpressure. To prevent weapon damage, limit internal leakage in lift systems hydraulic components so the maximum drift rate does not exceed 0.5 inch per hour.

13000 Yes Are there proposed changes to the lift control system including hydraulic and electrical systems?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 13 Question Key 13000

13001 Yes Are there proposed changes to the specifications or requirements (make, model, or pressure setting) for any of the hydraulic pressure relief valves?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 13 Question Key 13001

13002 Yes Are there proposed changes to the specifications or requirements (make, model, or pressure setting) for any of the pneumatic pressure relief valves?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 13 Question Key 13002

13003 Yes Are there proposed changes to the specifications or requirements (make, model, or settings) for any of the electrical limit switches (This includes mechanical and proximity switches)?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 13 Question Key 13003

13004 Yes Are there proposed changes that relax or degrade the specifications or requirements (make, model, performance characteristics, ratings, or settings) for any of the hydraulic components?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 13 Question Key 13004

13005 Yes Are there proposed changes that relax or degrade the specifications or requirements (make, model, performance characteristics, ratings, or settings) for any of the pneumatic components?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 13 Question Key 13005

13006 Yes Are there proposed changes to the electrical circuits controlling the lift function, including limit switches, sensors, and software?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 13 Question Key 13006

13007 Yes Are there proposed changes to the hydraulic lift circuit including valves, actuators, manifolds, or fluid lines?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 13 Question Key 13007

13008 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 13 Question Key 13008

Question Group: 14 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.11.2 A/F Criticality Tines and Adapters Class Notes Ensure there are provisions in the Tunner deck for "tines". Ensure the Tunner C.G. and the rated load C.G. are compatible.

14000 Yes Will the tine trough space claim be changed or will any component weight or cargo weight rating be changed by more than 1,000 pounds?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14000

14001 Yes Are there proposed dimensional changes being made to the tine trough space claims which will decrease its length, width, or height?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14001

14002 Yes Will there be a total weight change of 5,000 pounds or more in any 5 foot section of the loader?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14002

14003 Yes Will the weight of an individual component, or assembly be changed by 1,000 pounds or more?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14003

14004 Yes Have any of the loads as specified in SP1-9032950 been changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14004

14005 Yes Have any of the full loads specified in SP1-9032950 been changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14005

14006 Yes Have any of the palletized cargo specified in SP1-9032950 been changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14006

14007 Yes Have any of the rolling stock specified in SP1-9032950 been changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14007

14008 Yes Has any of the containerized cargo as specified in SP1-9032950 been changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14008

14009 Yes Has any of the platform cargo as specified in SP1-9032950 been changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14009

14010 Yes Have any of the unbalanced loads as specified in SP1-9032950 been changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14010

14011 Yes Have any of the partial loads as specified in SP1-9032950 been changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14011

14012 Yes Have any of the HCU-6/E pallet overloads as specified in SP1-9032950 been changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14012

14013 Yes Have any of the moving loads as specified in SP1-9032950 been changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14013

14014 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 14 Question Key 14014

Question Group: 15 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.11.3 A/F Criticality Movement Controls

Class Notes Make all movement controls self centering. Add mechanical stops, or electrical switches, to prevent overtravel in all directions of the lift control. Include in the Tunner a capability for small increments of movement (inching) in both reverse and forward directions. Lift links may be individually controlled, but must be capable of synchronization to provide a uniformly controlled lifting attitude.

15000 Yes Are there proposed changes to any part of the deck motion control system, including mechanical parts and assemblies, the hydraulic control system, and the electrical control system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15000

15001 Yes Are there proposed changes to the components, or parts, of the pitch, roll, yaw, or side shift systems?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15001

15002 Yes Are there proposed changes to the geometry of the pitch, roll, yaw, or side shift systems?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15002

15003 Yes Are there proposed changes to the pitch, roll, yaw, or side shift systems hydraulics (valves, manifolds, actuators, and fluid lines)?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15003

15004 Yes Are there proposed changes to the pitch, roll, yaw or side shift system's electronics (including switches, circuits, and software)?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15004

15005 Yes Are there proposed changes to the specifications or requirements for any of the electrical limit switches used in the pitch, roll, or side shift and yaw systems (This includes mechanical and proximity switches)?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15005

15006 Yes Will any process used to fabricate any of the components, or parts, of the pitch, roll, yaw, or side shift systems components be changed?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15006

15007 Yes Are there proposed changes to the lift linkage geometry?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15007

15008 Yes Are there proposed changes to the lift cylinders?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15008

15009 Yes Are there proposed changes to the boost cylinder?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15009

15010 Yes Are there proposed changes to the lift links, lift control system (hydraulic and electrical), or pitch control system?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15010

15011 Yes Are there proposed changes to the lift control switches?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15011

15012 Yes Will the specified speed in the "load mode" be increased above 8 mph?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15012

15013 Yes Are there proposed changes to the drive system to affect inching characteristics?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15013

15014 Yes Are there proposed changes to the electronics controlling Drive or Suspension Mode?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15014

15015 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 15 Question Key 15015

Question Group: 16 A/F Manual AFMAN 91-118, par 3.18 A/F Criticality General Cargo Aircraft Criteria

Class Notes The air transportability of the Tunner shall meet the general specifications of MIL-STD-1791

16000 Yes Are there proposed changes to affect the air transportablity of the loader, including width, height, weight, chassis tie down lugs, and ramp crest clearance?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 16 Question Key 16000

16001 Yes Will the ability to stow the suspension elements under the chassis frame during air transport be degraded?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 16 Question Key 16001

16002 Yes Will any of the loader tie down points, for restraining the loader during air transport, be modified in any way?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 16 Question Key 16002

16003 Yes Will the width of the loader in the air transport mode be increased?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 16 Question Key 16003

16004 Yes Will there be a total weight change of 5,000 pounds or more in any 5 foot section of the loader?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 16 Question Key 16004

16005 Yes Will the weight of an individual component, or assembly be changed by 1,000 pounds or more?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 16 Question Key 16005

16006 Yes Are there proposed changes to affect ramp crest clearance?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 16 Question Key 16006

16007 Yes Is it the case that all the Secondary questions of this group did NOT affect the NCIS of the Tunner?

Sample Rationale for Question Group 16 Question Key 16007

- 1 -

ATTACHMENT 3 TO CDRL X004 15 Jul 2011

EVALUATION PROCESS – NUCLEAR CERTIFICATION IMPACT STATEMENT (NCIS)

The Contractor shall review each proposed change to determine if the change is applicable to the Nuclear Certification, and if so, determine the impact to the nuclear certification.

The review shall be performed by following the Nuclear Certification Impact Statement (NCIS) Checklist Template (Attachment 2), to ascertain if each proposed change pertains to an item or assembly, or product data, to which nuclear safety requirements apply (i.e., ascertain if the change is applicable to nuclear certification requirements). If not, no further evaluation or NCIS is required, but a record of this determination shall be documented using the NCIS Checklist template. For those changes that are applicable, a unique NCIS document shall be submitted for each change in accordance with the NCIS Template detailed in Attachment 1.

These reviews shall be recorded and documented for each proposed change as it is being processed for SRB approval. The results of these reviews shall be summarized and reported to the Government on a quarterly basis via CDRL X004 (Engineering Evaluation Report, Nuclear Certification Impact Statement (NCIS)). Each CDRL X004 submittal shall contain the explanation for any “yes” answer to a question on the NCIS checklist. When the product lifecycle management (PLM) data (e.g., finite element analysis (FEA)) must be re-accomplished to support the change, the supporting documentation shall be attached to the NCIS. This will allow the Government engineers at the program office at Robins AFB, GA, and at the Nuclear Weapons Center (NWC) the opportunity to review the technical documentation supporting the Contractor’s conclusion that there is no impact to the Nuclear Certification. This documentation becomes especially important when the change is marginally acceptable and when the program office is not clearly confident that the NWC would agree with all conclusions of the evaluation.

In the event the Contractor’s evaluation of a proposed change indicates that it may, if incorporated, negatively impact the Nuclear Certification as described above, the Contractor shall: (1) Submit its findings to the SRB for a determination of whether or not the Contractor shall continue to process the change for possible incorporation, and (2) Include the results of this evaluation in the next NCIS to be issued pursuant to CDRL X004.

The intent of these reviews shall be to ensure that a proposed change, if ultimately approved and incorporated, will not negatively impact the Nuclear Certification by resulting in the nuclear decertification of the loader or issuance of a usage restriction relative to the nuclear certification of the loader.

- 2 -

Unless otherwise directed in writing by the Government as indicated below, the Contractor shall not incorporate a proposed change that would cause rescission of the Nuclear Certification or issuance of a usage restriction relative to the Nuclear Certification.

If, as a result of this evaluation process, it appears that incorporation of a proposed change would negatively impact the loader nuclear certification, the Contractor shall not incorporate that change without first receiving written Government direction to that effect.