FA8224-20-R-0009 FINAL RFP QA Matrix 17July2020.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 28 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8224-20-R-0009
About this file
This document contains a question and answer file related to a solicitation for the Automated Test System Sustainment Initiative II contract. The solicitation will be issued by Hill Air Force Base on behalf of the Air Force Sustainment Center to acquire automated test system sustainment services over a potential nine-year period of performance starting in April 2021. The services are required to support the continued development and sustainment of test infrastructure for weapon systems and subsystems at the Ogden Air Logistics Complex. Key details include clarification that consent letters from subcontractors are only needed if submitting their past performance, removal of the requirement to address material solution analysis in proposals, extension of the total evaluated price matrix through the entire nine-year period, and confirmation that the proposal adequacy checklist is for task order use and not required for the initial contract proposal.
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Basic PWS
| AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE II (ATSSI II) Rev. FINAL RFP | ||||
| Question # | Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Government Response |
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 |
PWS Questions Page &P of &N
Section L
| AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE II (ATSSI II) Rev. FINAL RFP | ||||
| Question # | Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Government Response |
| 1 | L, 3.1, paragraphs 1 and 3; Section M, 2.3 | Section L "This information is required on the offeror and all subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners who are proposed to perform a significant portion of the effort (20% or more of contract effort). This is based on the offeror’s total proposed price, or performance aspects of the effort the offeror considers critical to overall successful performance. " |
"Along with the information required in this paragraph, the offeror shall submit a consent letter executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information."
Section M
| "The Past Performance assessment will assess the offeror’s ability--which includes the extent of its critical subcontractors’ involvement--to successfully accomplish the proposed effort based on the offeror’s demonstrated present and past work record. A critical subcontractor is defined as an entity subcontractor and/or joint venture partner who are proposed to perform a significant portion of the effort (20% or more of the contract effort)." | Will the Government please confirm that consent letters are only required for subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or join venture partners that the Offeror is submitting past performance citations for? | Yes. The consent letters provide approval for the Government to address the subcontractors' adverse performance information directly with the offeror (prime contractor) for responses. These consent letters are necessary to allow the Government to interface directly with the offeror for any discussions that may take place. | |||
| 2 | PWS 7.6.1, L.2.3.2.1, M.3.2.1: | The Government responded to the question concerning the material solution analysis phase of the systems engineering process by stating that the "Government will not be looking for it to be addressed in the offeror's proposal." | Will the Government clarify if they intend to release revised Section L and Section M documents that remove the requirement to address material solution analysis in the proposal? | Yes, the Government will post the changed documents with this Q&A response posting. |
Section L Questions Page &P of &N
Section M
| AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE II (ATSSI II) Rev .22 FINAL RFP | ||||
| Question # | Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Government Response |
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 |
Section M Questions Page &P of &N
TEP
| AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE II (ATSSI II) Rev. FINAL RFP | ||||
| Question # | Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Government Response |
| 1 | All Worksheets | The Government has defined the PoP as 22 APR 2021 to 21 APR 2030, however the Government-provided TEP Matrix ends at FY2029 and does not cover the entire PoP. | Does the Government plan to provide an updated TEP? If no, please confirm the Offeror may provide the NTE rate and information for FY30, thereby reflecting the entire period of performance, in their cost volume. | Yes, the Government will post the updated TEP Matrix to include FY2030 with this Q&A response posting. |
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 |
TEP Questions Page &P of &N
SOO
| AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE II (ATSSI II) Rev. FINAL RFP | ||||
| Question # | Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Government Response |
| 1 | ||||
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 |
SOO Questions Page &P of &N
DRAFT Solicitation
| AUTOMATED TEST SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT INITIATIVE II (ATSSI II) Rev. FINAL RFP | ||||
| Question # | Reference | Discussion | Question/Comment | Government Response |
| 1 | Section I | 252.215-7009 Proposal Adequacy Checklist | Given this is anticipated to be a competitive acquisition, our understanding is certified cost or pricing data would not be required. We respectfully request the Government’s clarification on whether the proposal adequacy checklist needs to be part of this IDIQ proposal. | This clause has been included for anticipated Task Order use. The Government does not expect it to be filled out by offerors for the basic IDIQ contract. |
The IDIQ awardee will be expected to fill it out when it is included in task order solicitations.
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| 5 |
Draft Solicitation Questions Page &P of &N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .