PWS_Basic_20_June_2011.pdf

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)

Engineering Service Contract

Northrop Grumman Corporation for the

Mature and Proven Aircraft Directorate

20 June 2011

Prepared by:

Michael P. Blinn

OO-ALC/GHMEJ

(801) 777-0535 michael. blinn@hill.af.mil

OGDEN AIR LOGISTICS CENTER

MATURE AND PROVEN AIRCRAFT DIRECTORATE

HILL AIR FORCE BASE, UTAH 84056

mailto:linn@hill.af.mil

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

LIST OF TAB LES Hi RECORD OF REVISIONS iv

1 DESCRIPTI ON 0 F SERVICES 1

1.1 Perfonnance Based Service Acquisition (PBSA) 1

J .2 Scope I

2 SERVICE SUMMAR Y 1

3 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY AND SERVICES 1

3.1 Data to be supplied I

3.2 Security and Access to Government Facilities and Equipment 3

3.2. I Security Clearance .3

3.2.2 Access to Government Facil ities 3

3.2.3 Access to Government Equipment 3

4 GENERAL INFO RMA TION 3

4.1 General. Requirements 3

4.2 Technical Objectives and Goals 3

4.3 Specific Requirements .4

4.4 Technical Documentation .4

4.4. I Data Compatibility .4

4.4.2 Data Analysis .4

4.4.3 Data Documentation 4

4.5 Fonnal Evaluations 4

4.5. I Preliminary Program Reviews 5

4.5.2 Mid-course Evaluations and Status Updates 5

4.5.3 Final Program Reviews 5

4.6 Contractor Travel 5

4.6. 1 Prel iminary Program Review Trip 5

4.6.2 Final Program Review Trip 5

4.6.3 Miscellaneous Program Support Trips 5

4.6.4 Government Site Visits 5

4.6.5 Travel Requirements 6

4.7 Integrated Management Support 6

4.7.1 Contractor Program Manager 6

MAPA/NGC Engineering Services Last Rev. Date: 20 June J J

PEKFORMANCE WORK STATEMEN'l

4.7.2 Contractor Interim Reporting " 6

4.7.3 Management Systems Requirements 6

4.7.4 Validation Program 6

4.7.5 Maintainabil ity Program 6

4.8 Configuration Management 6

4.9 Quality Control 7

4.10 Management Objectives 7

4.10.1 Government Inspection and Acceptance of Deliver abIes 7

4.1 0.2 Assessment 7

5 APPENDICES AND AITACHMENTS 8

5.1 Applicable Documents 8

5.!.1

5.2

5.2.1

5.2.2

5.3

Document Availability and Delivery 8

Appl icable CDRLs 8

CDRL List 8

Contractor Reportin g 8

Points of Contact 9

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIA TIONS 10

AITACHMENT ONE: LIST OF APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS Al-l

ATTACHMENT TWO: APPLICABLE CDRLS ; A2-1

AITACHMENT THREE: PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES A3-1

ii MAPAlNGC Engineering Services Last Rev. Date: 20 June 11

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENl

LIST OF TABLES

Page

Table I: Service Summary for the MAPAlNGC Engineering Services 2 Table 2: CDRL List for the MAPAlNGC Engineering Services Contract.. A2-1 Table 3: Performance Objectives for the MAPAlNGC Engineering Services Contract A3-1 iii MAPAINGC Engineering Services Last Rev, Date: 20 June II

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

RECORD OF REVISIONS

REV DATE PAGE(S) SECTION REASON FOR REVISIONAFFECTED AFFECTED

- 20 June 11 n/a n/a Original PWS date of release iv MAPAlNGC Engineering Services Last Rev. Date: 20 June II

1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES

The following Performance Work Statement (PWS) provides a general description of the required proprietary engineering services from NGC in support of the T-38 and F-5 weapon systems. Both weapons systems are managed by the Mature and Proven Aircraft Division, MAP A Branch.

l.l Performance Based Service Acquisition (PBSA)

This PWS is prepared in accordance with Air Force Instruction 63-124. The philosophy ofPBSA is to design mission support strategies that obtain higher levels of contractor performance, foster synergistic partnerships, accommodate changing or unforeseen mission needs, and leverage commercial best practices.

1.2 Scope

This PWS covers the sole proprietary task requirements related to over-arching engineering and technical activities that are required by the government to support the T-38 and F-5 aircraft platforms.

2 SERVICE SUMMARY

Table 1 describes the Service Summary (SS) for the tasks as outlined in this PWS. Most of the efforts as described in this PWS will be engineering services and program management related tasks that must be performed by NGC.

3 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY AND SERVICES

3.1 Data to be supplied

Modification Drawings, Government Owned Reports, Technical Orders (T.0.) and related technical data to be provided for contractor tasks to update and maintaining OSS&E and baseline configuration.

T-38C Structural Modification Drawings

Government Owned Reports and Tech Orders

MAPA/NGC Engineering Services

Table 1- Service Summary for the MAPAlNGC Engineering Services

Performance Objectives PWS Performance Threshold Reference (Minimum Acceptable)

Engineering Activities: 4.3 For engineering analysis (or assessments or Provide engineering analyses. studies): the analysis must have standard English assessments, studies, component or grammar, punctuation and spelling; the problem system~level designs, or testing to statement and assumptions must be clearly stated;

substantiate a new or improved system the reference must be cited for the mathematic (or sub-system or component) analytical model (be it deterministic or a stochastic capability or trouhleshoot 1 isolate faults model); the flow of analysis must be logical, the in a current design configuration. analysis steps must be shown in sufficient detail such that an entry-level engineer can follow and a journeymen engineer can recreate; the input values/units to the model must be cited; the mathematics must be free from significant errors;

the results/conclusions must be clearly identified;

and the implications of the result/conclusion must be clearly stated.

For component or system-level designs: the design must be validated by one or more of the following methods: analysis, inspection, demonstration, or test

For testing: the test must follow the approved test plan.

Technical Documentation: 4.4. I through 100% of revisions are free of content errors (Le.

Submit revisions to Technical Orders 4.4.3 they reflect the configuration defined in the (T.O.) and Time Compliance Technical approved product or functional baseline. They Orders (TCTO) to include source data conform to the requirements as outlined in the 00-for USAF aircraft specific T.O.'s and 5-1/00-5-15 T.O. IEEE and all applicable TCTO's. documentation standards in Aviation Industry.

Configuration Management: 4.8 Provide a clear and unambiguous definition of the Establish and implement control product and functional configuration baseline.

procedures for managing established USAF aircraft specific baselines.

Quality Control: 4.9 Provide Quality Assurance program 15 days after Engineering services shall use PBSA contract award, program shall include procedures and maintain a quality program to and policies for demonstrating 100% inspection of ensure services are delivered in studies/reports are accomplished prior to delivery.

accordance with established procedures and guidelines.

2 MAP A1NGC Engineering Services

3.2 Security and Access to Government Facilities and Equipment

3.2.1 Security Clearance

The efforts required for this task are UNCLASSIFIED and will not require Contractor personnel to obtain a security clearance. Contractor personnel shall abide by all Air Force rules, procedures, and standard of conduct. Contractors requiring access to Air Force Automated Information Systems (AlS) shall have background investigations and security awareness training completed prior to the start of contract performance. When the period of performance is complete and/or the contractor personnel leave work on this project, they will return all access cards and base identification badges within five days.

3.2.2 Access to Government Facilities

Access to Government facilities is limited. Therefore, the contractor shall coordinate the need, time, and personnel requiring access to Government facilities with the Government Program Manager (PM), at least two weeks prior to need. The Government PM or designated representative will coordinate between the contractor and base personnel as required.

3.2.3 Access to Government Equipment

The Government PM will assist the contractor in obtaining the necessary clearance for access to Government equipment, as the program dictates. Assist contractor in obtaining access to government related technical order system.

4 GENERAL INFORMA nON

4.1 General Requirements

General requirements for sustainment engineering are given in MIL-HDBK-SI4, "Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness for the Aeronautical Enterprise," (Ref. 4, Attachment One).

In addition, other key guiding documents that cover the integrity programs are JSSG-2006, MIL- STD-1S30C, MIL-STD-1798B, MIL-HDBK-S1S, and MIL-HDBK-87244 (Ref. 1-3,5 and 6, Attachment One).

4.2 Technical Objectives and Goals

The T-38 and F-S weapon systems are required to remain viable for at least the next decade. As mature weapon systems in their later stages of sustainment, it is imperative that the T-38 and F-S communities have a strong and experienced engineering support system to address the anticipated aging aircraft related challenges yet to be faced. Under the over-arching guidance of this PWS, it is intended that the Government shall have a direct link to the T-38 and F-S OEM

3 MAPA/NGC Engineering Services

(Northrop Grumman Corporation) in order to obtain engmeenng servIces to meet the sustainment goals of both weapon systems.

4.3 Specific Requirements

The contractor shall provide the appropriate engineering, program management, and technical services as outlined in this PWS. It is an objective of this program that the contract defines, as a minimum, the contractor's support of the following USAF aircraft engineering activities within ASIP and Systems Engineering:

Aircraft Structural Integrity Program (ASIP) Mil STD 1530C

Systems Engineering (SE)

4.4 Technical Documentation

Engineering services can include, but are not limit to reVISIons to USAF aircraft -specific Technical Orders (T.O.s) and Time Compliance Technical Orders (TCTOs). Engineering services can also include providing source data for T.O.s or TCTO.

4.4.1 Data Compatibility

All contractor work shall be fully compatible and usable when loaded onto MAPA assets.

It should be noted that software is continually being upgraded, so any specific listing herein are given as examples. At the present time, the T-38 ASIP and Analysis Group (OO-ALC/GHMEJ) has PATRAN 2008 (RI), NASTRAN 2008 (RI), Stress Check Ver.

9.2, AFGROW Ver. 5.01.05.16, Siemens NX Ver. 7.5, and a MSFT Windows based operating system.

4.4.2 Data Analysis

Data modeling and analysis techniques shall cover a broad range of engineering disciplines; thus, these analyses require their own specific and unique engineering approaches. As good examples of recent modeling and analysis work, a number of engineering reports are provided at the end of this PWS (Ref. 7-12, Attachment One). All reporting of the data analysis shall be according to the guidelines of the Service Summary (see Table I) and Para. 5.2.2 ofthis PWS.

4.4.3 Data Documentation

The following documentation shall be required under each delivery order per the CDRL (DD Form 1423). Additional data requirements, such as Technical Orders and particular CDRLs, shall be specified in the individual delivery orders referencing back to the Basic contract referenced list of CDRLs.

4.5 Formal Evaluations

The following formal evaluations are to be supported by the contractor:

4 MAPAINGC Engineering Services

4.5.1 Preliminary Program Reviews

A preliminary program review for the contractor to present their refined "way ahead" for each task order, and further discuss the anticipated challenges with the tasks, is required 30 days following ARO. The contractor shall provide a PPT docwnent as well as present minutes of the meeting in the most appropriate quarterly report.

4.5.2 Mid-course Evaluations and Status Updates

Depending on the needs of a specific task order, monthly or quarterly status updates and information exchanges between the Government and the contractor will be conducted.

These interchanges can be accomplished via teleconferencing or by a face-to-face meeting. Unless otherwise arranged, minutes will be maintained by the Contractor. For each task order, performance and cost reporting must be submitted monthly. The performance and cost reports shall provide current status and projected expenditure of funds, man-hours, and work completion in Microsoft compatible format.

4.5.3 Final Program Reviews

A final review to present the final results and discuss the outcomes of the particular task orders shall be held at the conclusion of the program.

4.6 Contractor Travel

The following are general contractor travel requirements to be considered:

4.6. I Preliminary Program Review Trip

To ensure the appropriate level of up-front detail for each specific task order, the contractor shall plan for one preliminary program review trip (see also Para. 4.5.1).

4.6.2 Final Program Review Trip

To ensure a final close-out for each specific task order, the contractor shall plan for one final program review trip (see also Para. 4.5.3).

4.6.3 Miscellaneous Program Support Trips

The contractor should plan for miscellaneous trips, tailored to each task order to include:

4.6.4 Government Site Visits

During the course of task order execution and in addition to the program reviews, the contractor shall plan for various site visits to Government facilities (e.g., Hill AFB, UT, Randolph AFB, TX, etc.). These site visits are intended to promote better communication during the course of any program.

5 MAPA/NGC Engineering Services

4.6.5 Travel Requirements

All travel to sites in support of the contract will be authorized through the SPO prior to leaving on temporary duty. All duties to be performed while on site will be defined prior to authorization. Travel shall be LAW Joint Travel Regulations (JTRV2), travel costs shall be cost reimbursable line items.

4.7 Integrated Management Support

4.7.1 Contractor Program Manager

For this effort, the contractor shall identifY and maintain a program manager (PM). The program manager shall have a defined and direct line of authority and responsibility over all aspects of the work effort. The contractor's work progress, status and any corrective action shall be documented.

4.7.2 Contractor Interim Reporting

The contractor shall submit status reports on the program's progress. Reports shall be relatively error free and technically correct, as per the guidelines of Table I.

4.7.3 Management Systems Requirements

Management systems requirements are to be provided by the contractor.

4.7.4 Validation Program

Management systems requirements are to be provided by the contractor.

4.7.5 Maintainability Program

Management systems requirements are to be provided by the contractor. Continuation of Essential DoD Contractor Services During Crisis: The contractor is responsible for ensuring provisions are in place to continue to provide the essential services of this program in times of crisis. The contractor shall work with the Government to defme those essential services, with these services defined in the first quarterly report.

4.8 Configuration Management

Engineering services includes, updating of the USAF aircraft-specific baseline (e.g., engineering drawings or engineering change orders and associated process specifications). These configuration baselines could be either the product, allocated or functional configuration baselines.

6 MAP AlNGC Engineering Services

4.9 Quality Control

Engineering services shall include development and maintenance of a quality program to ensure services are delivered in accordance with requirements.

4.10 Management Objectives

The management objective is to allow Northrop the maximum flexibility to innovatively manage the program schedule, performance, risks, warranties, subcontracts, and data to produce engineering services that satisfy the USAF performance requirements. Another objective is to maintain clear government visibility into the program schedule, performance, and risk.

4.10.1 Government Inspection and Acceptance of Deliverables

The Government Program Manager shall have the right to reject or require corrections of any deficiencies found in deliverables. In the event of rejection of any deliverable, the Contractor will be notified in writing by the Government Program Manager of the specific reasonls why the deliverable was rejected. The Contractor shall have 30 workdays to correct the rejected deliverable and resubmit to the Government Program Manager for re-inspection. If no comments are provided within 30 calendar days of deliverable receipt, the deliverable will be deemed to have been accepted by the Government. Wide Area Work Flow shall be used for the reporting of deliverables and invoicing directed to the Acceptor defined in the contract. This will be the spa Program Manager.

4.10.2 Assessment

The contractor, not the Government, is responsible for managing and ensuring the contractor's performance meets the terms of the contract. The Government has the responsibility to monitor cost, schedule, and performance of the contract ensuring requirements of the contract are met. The contractor's performance will be evaluated, by the responsible multi-functional team (MFT) members assigned to the engineering activity addressed in 2.1-2.1.9 of this document, according to Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) defined standards.

All efforts preformed by the contractor shall be expected to meet the level of "Acceptable" at a minimum. For each delivery order, the contractor performs at an "Unacceptable" level; the Government will first negotiate re-performance measures to eliminate deliverable defects. If re-performance measures fail to produce "Acceptable" levels the Government Program Manager will compile a list of "Unacceptable" performances and notifY the contractor's upper management in writing of the Government's dissatisfaction with the level of performance demonstrated.

7 MAP AlNGC Engineering Services

Additionally, the notifications may result in negative entries into the Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS) in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR) Part 15.304.

5 APPENDICES AND ATTACHMENTS

5.1 Applicable Documents

5.1.1 Document Availability and Delivery

If the Government deems appropriate, the contractor may use other applicable documents. Also, the contractor shall request necessary documents from the Government, as required. In turn, the Government shall supply all required TOs and TCTOs for the contractor to perform the tasks of this PWS.

5.2 Applicable CDRLs

5.2.1 CDRL List

The deliverable products (CDRL list) for this PWS are presented in Table 2 (see Attachment Two). This list shall be the central location referenced for all taskings awarded under this contract. Any edits or addendums shall be to this portion within the basic contract.

Note: See DD Form 1423 for further details.

5.2.2 Contractor Reporting

The contractor shall submit reports in accordance with the DIDs specified in DD form 1423 (see Attachment Two) with the following stipulations. Tables, figures, drawings, etc. shall be placed immediately following their reference in the main body of the text (i.e. same page if possible or on the next page). Reports shall be submitted in a hard cover 3-ring binder. This will facilitate the report revision by allowing addition or replacement of individual pages without having to submit a completely new report.

Unless otherwise noted, any necessary corrections shall be made within 30 days of Government notification.

8 MAPA1NGC Engineering Services

5.3 Points of Contact

Government Program Manager(s):

Mr. Vivian Hughes, (801) 586-9487

Government Engineer:

Mr. Michael Blinn, (801) 777-0535

Government Buyer:

Ms. Shauna Lyon, (801) 775-3801

Contract Officer:

Ms. Deborah Sparks, (80 I) 586-0690

9 MAPAlNGC Engineering Services

AETC

AF

AFI

AFB

ASIP

AUP

DoD

FEA

FEM

MAPA

MSCINASTRAN

MSFT

NGC

NOR

OEM

OO-ALC

Para.

PBSA

PWS

PM

PMP

QA

Ref.

SPM

SPO

SS

TBD

TCTO

T.O.

USAF

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

- Air Education and Training Command

- Air Force

- Air Force Instruction

- Air Force Base

- Aircraft Structural Integrity Program

- Avionics Upgrade Program

- Department of the Defense

- finite element analysis

- finite element model

- Mature and Proven Aircraft Directorate

- finite element computer program maintained by the MacNeal-Schwendler Corporation

- Microsoft

- Northrop Grumman Corporation

- Northrop

- Original Equipment Manufacturer

- Ogden Air Logistics Center

- paragraph

- Performance Based Service Acquisition

- Performance Work Statement

- Program Manager

- Propulsion Modernization Program

- Quality Assurance

- reference

- System Program Manager

- System Program Office

- Service Summary

- to be determined

- Time Compliant Technical Order

- Technical Order

- United States Air Force

10 MAPAfNGC Engineering Services

ATTACHMENT ONE: LIST OF APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

Department of Defense (DoD) Specifications

I) JSSG-2006, "Aircraft Structures," October 1998.

Department of Defense (DoD) Standards

2) MIL-STD-1530C, "Aircraft Structural Integrity Program," November 2005.

3) MIL-STD-1798B, "Mechanical Equipment and Subsystems Integrity Program," January

2010.

Department of Defense (DoD) Handbooks

4) MIL-HDBK-514, "Operational Safety, Suitability, and Effectiveness for the Aeronautical

Enterprise," March 2003.

5) MIL-HDBK-515, "Weapon System Integrity Guide (WSIG)," October 2002.

6) MIL-HDBK-87244, "Avionics/Electronics Integrity," January 1995.

Northrop Grumman Reports

7) NOR 07-101, Rev. C, "Finite Element Model User's Manual," September 2010.

8) NOR 08-100, Rev. C, "T-38C Fuselage Update Analysis," September 2010.

9) NOR 09-100, Rev. A, "Finite Element Model Description and Internal Loads,"

September 20 I O.

10) NOR 09-10 I, Rev. A, "Finite Element Model Section Properties," September 2010.

11) NOR 09-102, "T-38C Pacer Classic III (Phase I) Engineering Study," August 2009.

12) NOR 10-104, "T-38C Pacer Classic III (Phase II) Engineering Study," September 2010.

Note: If the Government deems appropriate, the contractor may use other applicable documents.

AI-I MAPA/NGC Engineering Services

ATTACHMENT TWO: APPLICABLE CDRLS

Table 2 - CDRL List for the MAPAlNGC Engineering Services Contract

CDRL DID Reference Title AOOI DI-ADMN-8l249A CONFERENCE AGENDA A002 DI-ADMN-8l250A CONFERENCE MINUTES

A003 DI-ADMN-81308 CONFERENCE REPORT

A007 DI-CMAN-80639C ENGINEERING CHANGE PROPOSAL

(ECP)

AOl2 DI-DRPR-8l242 INSTALLATION CONTROL

DRAWINGS

AOl7 DI-GDRO-80650 DESIGN DATA AND CALCULATIONS A026 DI-IPSC-8l435A SOFTWARE DESIGN DESCRIPTION

(SDD)

A039 DI-MGMT-80227 CONTRACTOR'S PROGRESS,

STATUS AND MANAGEMENT

REPORT

A040 DI-MGMT-80368 STATUS REPORT

A042 DI-MGMT-81024 SYSTEM ENGINEERING

MANAGEMENT PLAN (SEMP)

A045 DI-MISC-80508A TECHNICAL REPORT -

STUDY/SERVICES

A046 DI-MISC-80526D PARTS MANAGEMENT PLAN

A047 DI-MISC-8071IA SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL

REPORTS

A049 DI-NDTI-80809B TEST/INSPECTION REPORT

A070 DI-RELI-80255 FAILURE SUMMARY AND

ANALYSIS REPORT

A074 DI-RELI -80685 CRITICAL ITEMS LIST

A080 DI-SESS-8l OOOC Product DrawingIModels and Associated

Lists A08l DI-MGMT-80004 Management Plan A082 DI-MGMT -80507 Project Planning Chart A083 DI-NDTI-80603 Test Procedure A090 DI-MCCR-80700 Computer Software Product End Item

A2-1 MAPA/NGC Engineering Services

ATTACHMENT THREE: PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES

Table 3 - Performance Objectives for the MAP AlNGC Engineering Services Contract

Performance Objective PWS Performance Threshold Method of Surveillance Para.

Access to Government 3.2.2 Documents submitted will PM or designated Facilities Requests be complete, all necessary representative shall log information provided will and document sight visit be delivered to the SPO requests making sure with a minimum of2 documentation is correct weeks prior to sight visit. and received in ample time.

Data Compatibility 4.4.1 All data provided shall be Data provided shall be fully compatible and free of any errors.

usable when loaded onto MAP A assets.

Data Analysis 4.4.2 Data analysis shall be Documentation will be and complete, outlining the provided for review a

5.2.2 type of analysis used, the month prior to due date as reason that analysis was outlined in individual selected and provide PWS. Final complete outline covering documentation will be the thought process and free from any errors.

rational for determination.

A3-1 MAPA/NGC Engineering Services