INE_Production_SOW_Nov_13_2019.pdf
PDF 260 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA8128-20-R-0002
About this file
This is a solicitation for a 14-year indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract for the remanufacture of Inertial Navigation Elements. The Air Force Materiel Command Nuclear Weapons Center is seeking to negotiate solely with Northrop Grumman Services Corporation for the remanufacturing work. The effort includes a three-year initial ordering period followed by four two-year periods and a final three-year period, with delivery orders issued as needed. The contractor must furnish all materials, facilities, labor, parts, equipment, and expertise to restore the items to their original expected lifespan. The minimum order quantity is 40 units and maximum is 550 over the life of the contract. The solicitation waives pre-award surveys and initial production evaluations. Certified cost or pricing data will be required.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| CDRL_Report_INE.pdf | ||
| DI_ADMN_81250B.pdf | ||
| Packaging.pdf | ||
| DI_MISC_80508B.pdf | ||
| DI_NDTI_80566A.pdf | ||
| DI_ADMN_81249B.pdf | ||
| DI_MGMT_80259.pdf | ||
| DI_MGMT_81605.pdf | ||
| DI_MGMT_81634C.pdf | ||
| GFP_Attachment_INE.pdf | ||
| DI_QCIC_80798C.pdf | ||
| AFMC_Form_158.pdf | ||
| FA812820R0002.pdf | ||
| SPI_F01_163_8424.pdf | ||
| DI_NDTI_80603A.pdf | ||
| DI_MGMT_80227.pdf |
Show all 16
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE NUCLEAR WEAPONS CENTER
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE, OKLAHOMA 73145
DATE: 13 Nov 2019
AF CONTRACT NO: FA812820D-XXXX
STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)
Remanufacture of the AGM-86B Air Launch Cruise Missile (ALCM) Inertial Navigation Element (INE)
Prepared by Christine Nguyen –(405) 739-8868
Christine.nguyen@us.af.mil
AFNWC/NDMES
7330 Sentry Blvd
Tinker AFB, OK 73145
Maj. Michael Koepke –(405) 739-8821 Michael.koepke.1@us.af.mil
AFNWC/NDMPM
7330 Sentry Blvd
Tinker AFB, OK 73145 mailto:Christine.nguyen@us.af.mil mailto:Michael.koepke.1@us.af.mil
SIGNATURE PAGE
Maj. Michael Koepke Program Manager Missile Sustainment Division
CHRISTINE NGUYEN
Program Engineer
BRETT KEARNEY
Chief, Engineering Branch
MICHAEL HALL
Chief, Program Management and Integration Branch
ROBERT DANG
Chief Engineer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE SHEET
REVISION SHEET
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1. DEFINITIONS
1.2. PRE-AWARD SURVEY REQUIREMENTS
1.3. INITIAL PRODUCTION EVALUATION (IPE) REQUIREMENTS
1.4. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1.5. RECORDS MANAGEMENT
1.6. QUALITY PROGRAM AND INSPECTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
1.7. CONDEMNATION CANDIDATES
1.8. TOOLS AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE)
1.9. PRECIOUS METALS RECOVERY PROGRAM
1.10. NUCLEAR REQUIREMENTS
1.11. PARTS CONTROL PROGRAM
1.12 COUNTERFEIT PREVENTION PLAN
1.13 OZONE DEPLETING SUBSTANCES
1.14 CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES
1.15 SAFETY AND HEALTH STATEMENT
SECTION 2: DESCRIPTION OF WORK
2.1. GENERAL
2.2 SPECIFIC WORK REQUIREMENTS
2.3 SHIPPING DOCUMENTATION
2.4 DELIVERY SCHEDULE
2.5 SURGE
2.6 OVER AND ABOVE
2.7 BEYOND ECONOMICAL REMANUFACTURE
2.8 QUALITY ACCEPTANCE AND PROCESSING
2.9 END ITEM IDENTIFICATION AND MARKING
2.10 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
SECTION 3: GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
3.1 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY
3.2 DISPOSITION OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
3.3 DISCREPANCIES INCIDENT TO SHIPMENT
3.4 FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AUDIT READINESS (FIAR)
3.5 OTHER
SECTION 4: APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
4.2 OTHER PUBLICATIONS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY
4.3 CONTRACTOR DOCUMENTS
PREFACE SHEET
END ITEM
RECEIVED AS
END ITEM
TO BE DELIVERED AS
NATIONAL
STOCK NUMBER
PART
NUMBER
NATIONAL
STOCK NUMBER
PART
NUMBER
1420-01-163-8424NT 750600-0002 1420-01-163-8424NT DONORS
1420-01-163-8424NT 750600-0003 1420-01-163-8424NT 750600-0005
1420-01-163-8424NT 750600-0004 1420-01-163-8424NT 750600-0005
Note: There are several different part numbers of the INE which may be received. However the output will be the same.
REVISION SHEET
When a revision is received, it should be inserted into this SOW. The superseded pages should be retained as a record.
NOTE: The portion of the text of this specification affected by the current revision is indicated by a black underscore for figures, words, or phrases within a given paragraph, and by a black vertical line in the outer margin where the change constitutes a whole paragraph.
After the revised pages have been inserted into the SOW, the revised title page should be inserted in front of the existing title page. This revision page is placed under the basic title page.
DATES OF ISSUE FOR ORIGINAL AND CHANGED PAGES ARE:
Revision Number
Change Summary Page Date
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1. DEFINITIONS
The following definitions are applicable to this SOW:
i. End Item: An end item is a complete piece of Government equipment as listed in Government supply catalogs and suitable for Government storage and issue. End items may contain one or more Shop Replaceable Unit (SRUs). End items are also referred to as Line Replaceable Units (LRUs). End items covered by work under this SOW are listed on the preface sheet.
ii. Initial Production Evaluation: IPE is a planned Government review of early production items and processes to evaluate a Contractor’s ability to complete the work in accordance with (IAW) the agreement, applicable technical orders, and other guidance required by this SOW.
iii. Remanufacture: An end item remanufacture as described within this SOW is the action taken to return the end item to a like-new condition. This remanufacture process is consistent with the provisions of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.1003-6(a)(1)
iv. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO): A contracting officer assigned the responsibility for the post award functions related to the administration of a Government contract in the field. The ACO is normally located in the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). The DCMA is responsible for ensuring the Contractor performs in accordance with the terms of the contract.
v. Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO): The individual authorized to enter into contract for supplies on behalf of the Government by formal advertising or negotiation and who is responsible for overall procurement of the contract.
vi. Technical Order (TO): An Air Force publication that gives specific technical directives and information with respect to the inspection, storage, operation, modification, and maintenance of Government equipment.
vii. Support Equipment (SE): All equipment called out is required for LRU, SRU, and component test, remanufacture, and/or modification.
viii. Serviceable: An item is considered serviceable if it is capable of meeting the functional and test requirements for which designed or modified as established by the applicable technical documentation in section 2.
ix. Repair: An end item repair is the action taken to return the end item to a serviceable condition by replacing all exposed consumable items and only the damaged recoverable parts that do not meet the inspection criteria. Repair consists of end item testing to determine deficiencies, disassembly as required to support maintenance actions required, thorough cleaning, refurbishment or replacement of all disturbed components not meeting inspection criteria, replacement of all soft parts (seals, gaskets, etc.) exposed during repair, re- assembly of assemblies and subassemblies, performance of all adjustments and alignments, test and calibration of subassemblies and end items, and final inspection (e.g. safety wiring, painting, affixing decals) IAW the approved test documentation.
x. Defect: A characteristic that does not conform to the specified requirements.
xi. Product Quality Deficiency: Any defect or nonconforming condition. Included are deficiencies in design, specification, material, manufacturing, and workmanship.
xii. Product Quality Deficiency Report (PQDR): The SF 368 form or format used to record and transmit product quality deficiency data.
xiii. Consumable Part: Piece parts that are not typically reused during remanufacture.
xiv. Re-usable Component: Non-accountable, expendable part or assembly that may be re-installed in an end item after inspection/repair and deemed serviceable.
xv. Recoverable Component: Accountable, non-expendable part or sub-assembly of an end item. Also referred to as a SRU. SRUs may be re-installed in an end item after inspection/repair and deemed serviceable. If applicable to the scope of this SOW, SRUs will be listed on the preface sheet.
1.2. PRE-AWARD SURVEY REQUIREMENTS
1.2.1 A Pre-Award Survey (PAS) is hereby waived.
1.3. INITIAL PRODUCTION EVALUATION (IPE) REQUIREMENTS
1.3.1 Initial Production Evaluation (IPE) is hereby waived.
1.4. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Reporting requirements are specified in the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL).
CDRL DID Title SOW
A001 DI-MISC-80508B Test Report 2.2.2
A002 DI-NDTI-80566A Test Plan 2.2.2
A003 DI-NDTI-80603A Test Procedure 2.2.2
A004 DI-ADMN-81250B Conference Minutes 2.2.2, 2.10.1 A005 DI-ADMN-81249B Conference Agenda 2.2.2, 2.10.1
A006 DI-MGMT-81605 Briefing Material 2.2.2, 2.10.1 A007 DI-MGMT-80227 Contractor's Progress, Status and
Management Report 2.10.2
A008 DI-MGMT-80259 Recurring Inventory Report 3.4.1 A009 DI-MISC-80508B/T GFP Report 3.4.2 A010 DI-QCIC-80798C Calibration Certificate 1.8.3 A011 DI-MGMT-81634C CAVAF/GFM/GFE Report See Attachment
1.5. RECORDS MANAGEMENT
1.5.1 The Contractor shall maintain and produce as requested by the government, for seven years a document package containing the following documentation for each end item produced:
a. Test Acceptance Review Documentation
b. Parts replaced listed by each serial numbered end item remanufactured
1.6. QUALITY PROGRAM AND INSPECTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
1.6.1 The Contractor shall establish, document, and maintain a quality system as a means of ensuring that the end item conforms to specified requirements. The quality system shall be in accordance with contract requirements.
1.6.2 When a Deficiency Report is received for an end item remanufactured under the terms of this contract, the Contractor shall comply with the ACO’s directions to be provided in TO 00-35D-54, USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution.
1.6.3 The Contractor shall report any Government furnished property, for the work accomplished as outlined in this SOW, that is damaged or otherwise unsuitable for use to the PCO using a Quality Deficiency Report (QDR), SF Form 368.
1.6.4 The Contractor shall support quality audits as required by the ACO These audits could require that one or more end items be removed from the production line and subjected to any combination of inspection, testing, disassembly, or assembly to determine that the standards of performance and technical conformance meet the requirements of this SOW. The Contractor is required to correct a deficient process to eliminate the cause(s) of any defects as directed by the ACO or delegated authority.
1.6.5 The Contractor shall support quality assurance reviews to be conducted at the site of remanufacture at the request of the Government throughout the contract period IAW AS9100 Aerospace Standard.
1.6.6 The Contractor shall support a quality acceptance review by the DCMA representative at the site of work as specified in this SOW for each end item generated under the terms of this contract.
1.6.7 Contractor Requests for deviation/waiver shall be submitted to the PCO or delegated authority. Work shall not be initiated on assemblies/components affected by deviation/waiver pending approval/disapproval. Requests shall include the contract number, NSN, and part number (P/N) of the end item and lowest part/assembly affected, effect on cost/price and delivery schedule, description of deviation waiver, justification for deviation/waiver, and proposed corrective action taken.
1.7. CONDEMNATION CANDIDATES
1.7.1 The Contractor shall not condemn reparable or recoverable items without prior approval of the PCO. The Contractor shall ensure non-remanufactured items are disposed of IAW the Contractor’s Government-approved property procedures.
1.7.2 The disposition of condemned items will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the
PCO.
1.7.3 On units approved to be condemned by the Government, the Contractor is authorized to retain serviceable parts scrapped from the condemned unit. The cannibalized parts shall be retained by the Contractor for use in remanufacture of the same type end item.
These parts will not be replenished once consumed.
1.8. TOOLS AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE)
1.8.1 The SE required to accomplish the scope of work to be completed on end items under this contract are the responsibility of the contractor to furnish.
1.8.2 The contractor shall ensure the accuracy of all calibrated SE prior to the IPE team visit and shall be demonstrated during the IPE.
1.8.3 Support Equipment Calibration Requirements. The contractor shall ensure documentation certifying the accuracy of all calibrated SE is made available to the PCO prior to work being performed. The contractor shall ensure SE calibration is maintained throughout performance of this contract. Upon request, the contractor shall show calibration data to the PCO for each SE item as follows (CDRL A010 – Calibration Certificate).
a. SE part number and serial number
b. Date calibrated
c. Calibration due date
d. Calibration source
e. Calibration procedure used
f. Verification of full performance compliance IAW this SOW for SE items not requiring calibration
1.9. PRECIOUS METALS RECOVERY PROGRAM
1.9.1 The Precious Metals Recovery Program is not applicable to this SOW. The handling and control of precious metals shall be IAW AFI 23-101, Air Force Materiel Management, if necessary.
1.10. NUCLEAR REQUIREMENTS
1.10.1 Nuclear Hardness. The Contractor shall notify the PCO if the work may have an impact to the nuclear hardness of the item within one (1) business day of determination.
The Contractor shall not continue remanufacture actions until Government approval is obtained from the PCO.
1.10.2 Nuclear Certification. The contractor shall avoid any action which may affect the
INE’s nuclear certification, IAW AFI 63-125. Should such action be unavoidable, it is the responsibility of the contract to justify the action to the Cognizant Government Engineer (AFNWC/NDME, Tinker AFB, Oklahoma). The justification shall be sufficient to satisfy the Air Force Nuclear Weapon Center (AFNWC), as well as any and all other governing agencies, that the action will not adversely impact the nuclear surety of OSS&E of the ALCM weapon system. The contractor shall also be responsible for providing documentation and technical assistance to support the government’s nuclear certification process IAW AFT 63-125 should it be required.
1.11. PARTS CONTROL PROGRAM
1.11.1 The Contractor shall establish, document, and maintain a Parts Control Program for the work associated with this SOW.
a. The Parts Control Program shall include an end item parts listing from the applicable
Government engineer approved OEM parts list. The approved OEM parts list shall serve as the current baseline for an end item or system unless otherwise stated in this
SOW.
b. The Contractor shall keep records to allow traceability of sourcing of replacement parts for each end item remanufactured. These records shall be furnished for inspection upon Government request.
1.11.2 Approval from the PCO is required for the Contractor to use any parts not contained in the approved OEM parts list. The Contractor shall maintain configuration of items worked under the scope of this contract as identified in this SOW. The Contractor shall notify the PCO in writing of any configuration discrepancies noted between the approved OEM parts list, engineering drawings, and the current configuration of the end item. The Contractor shall obtain written authorization from the cognizant engineering activity via the PCO for configuration deviations prior to change.
1.11.3 The Contractor shall only use replacement parts purchased directly from the end item OEM or from identical Reference Measuring Unit & Computer (RMUC) parts. In the event that parts are not available from either of these two sources for a pending remanufacture operation, the Contractor shall request permission to utilize an alternate source. The cognizant engineering authority shall provide written authorization via the PCO for any deviations from the aforementioned sources. In the instance that surplus components are available, the cognizant engineering activity reserves the right to approve or disapprove the material. Written authorization for surplus material use shall be obtained from the cognizant engineering activity via the
PCO.
1.11.4 Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP). The Contractor shall participate in the GIDEP practices described below in accordance with the DOD-wide practices outlined in Topic 26A of the Defense Acquisition Deskbook (DAD).
The Contractor shall review GIDEP ALERTs, Problem Advisories, and other GIDEP Failure Experience Reports (FER) for potential impact to hardware both in repair and delivered items. The Contractor shall notify the PCO, via telecom or electronic communication within two (2) business days of discovery, if a FER will negatively impact system performance. For FERs that identify parts or materials that are noncompliant to hardware specifications or drawings but do not affect performance requirements of production items, the Contractor shall dispose of them through its internal quality assurance processes. The Contractor shall review GIDEP DMSMS notices for applicability to the operational hardware being delivered. The contractor shall support GIDEP Urgent Data Request (UDR) efforts and, when applicable, take advantage of the Calibration Procedures, Metrology Documents, and Technical Manuals available at no cost to GIDEP participants to reduce overall contract costs.
1.12 COUNTERFEIT PREVENTION PLAN
1.12.1 Counterfeit Prevention Plan (CPP). Contractors that supply electronic parts or systems that contain electronic parts shall establish policies and procedures to avoid, detect, mitigate and disposition counterfeit electronic parts to prevent such parts from entering the USAF/DoD supply chain.
1.12.2 These policies and procedures shall be documented in a CPP for submission and in accordance with Data Item Description (DID) (DI-MISC-81832) and accomplished for all specified contract items. DI-MISC-81832 is applicable to Parts, Material and Processes Selection (PMPS) associated with delivery of systems and assemblies to the USAF and DoD. The requirements established by DI-MISC-81832 also apply to electronics components procured in sustainment of such systems and assemblies. The requirements of the recently DoD-adopted SAE 5553, Aerospace Standard, Counterfeit Electronics Parts; Avoidance, Detection, Mitigation, and Disposition shall also apply.
1.13 OZONE DEPLETING SUBSTANCES
1.13.1 This SOW is not explicitly requiring the use of a Class 1 ozone depleting substance
(ODS) in the performance of this agreement. The contractor is authorized to use a suitable substitute for any Class 1 ODS which may be required by the engineering or technical data specified by this SOW. The contractor shall immediately identify the substitute in writing to the PCO when a substitute has been determined.
1.14 CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES
1.14.1 Contractor employees shall identify themselves by introducing themselves or being introduced as contractor personnel and displaying distinguishing badges or other visible identification for meeting with government personnel. In addition, contractor personnel shall appropriately identify themselves as contractor employees in telephone conversations and in formal and informal written correspondence.
1.15 SAFETY AND HEALTH STATEMENT
1.15.1 While performing work under this agreement the contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local regulations regarding occupational safety and health. The contractor shall notify the PCO, within eight (8) hours of any damage to government property during the execution of the contract. Mishap notifications shall contain, as a minimum, the following information:
a. Contractor, agreement number, name and title of person(s) reporting
b. Date, time and exact location of accident/incident
c. Brief narrative of accident/incident (events leading to accident/incident)
d. Cause of accident/incident, if known
e. Estimated cost of accident/incident (material and labor to repair/replace)
f. Nomenclature of equipment and personnel involved in accident/incident
g. Corrective actions (taken or proposed)
h. Other pertinent information
1.15.2 If requested by the designated PCO, the contractor shall immediately secure the mishap scene/damaged property and impound pertinent maintenance and training records, until released by the Procuring Safety Office. Contractors will not dispose of agreement data related to a mishap until notified to do so by the PCO.
SECTION 2: DESCRIPTION OF WORK
2.1. GENERAL
2.1.1 The work performed under this contract is to remanufacture the Air Launch Cruise Missile (ALCM) Inertial Navigation Element (INE) (P/N 750600). The remanufacture shall not impact the Operational Flight Software (OFS). This SOW defines the extent and types of work to be performed by the contractor.
2.1.2 The scope of this contract is to utilize Government approved manufacturing processes to complete the remanufacture and test of 550 INE’s, which shall include the newly manufactured A1/A2 CCAs. Additionally, the contractor will store Tomahawk RMUC compatible Circuit Card Assembly (CCA) at the contractor facility for usage.
2.1.3 The ALCM is managed by the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center Missile Sustainment Division (AFNWC/NDM) at Tinker AFB, Oklahoma, hereafter referred to as the Program Office. The Program Office’s responsibility is to ensure the ALCM’s reliability and sustainment through 2030 and beyond.
2.1.4 The work encompasses the disassembly, cleaning, inspection, maintenance, re-assembly, testing, and finishing actions as required to return the end item to a like new condition (750600-0005) that maintains form, fit, and function to the original configuration, in reference to preface sheet.
2.1.5 When a particular remanufacture is constrained for lack of remanufacture materials that are not and will not be immediately available, the Contractor may request authorization to remove components or subassemblies from other inducted assets (the donor) prior to full disassembly for remanufacture in order to expedite remanufactures. Component removal requests shall be subject to review and approval/disapproval by the cognizant engineering activity. Such component removal actions should only be considered upon exhaustion of all other sources of remanufacture materials. The Contractor shall replace all removed donor subassemblies with remanufactured or new subassemblies and all component parts with new and/or serviceable component parts. The Contractor shall not condemn donor end items or subassemblies.
2.2 SPECIFIC WORK REQUIREMENTS
2.2.1 REMANUFACTURE OF 550 INEs
a. Contractor shall use the part numbers as listed in the preface of this SOW and the government approved remanufacturing process to remanufacture the INE to serviceable condition.
b. For the purpose of this SOW, remanufacture means 100% replacement of all A1 (P/N 750785) and A2 (P/N 750760) CCAs with newly manufactured CCAs and the replacement of all unserviceable parts/SRUs with existing A-condition SRUs, and any other 100% replacement components as directed within the technical data.
i. Contractor shall use the approved remanufacturing process to build and test these circuit cards.
ii. Current item configuration shall be maintained in order to not impact the nuclear surety of the INE. Remanufacture to original specifications ATS 750699 while maintaining same form, fit, and function.
iii. If the contractor determines that a current item configuration is no longer supportable, they shall notify and inform the Government immediately of their finding and await further instructions on how to proceed.
2.2.2 STAND UP SHOP REPLACEABLE UNIT (SRU) TESTING CAPABILITY
a. The contractor has developed the capability to test A1, A2 and PS4 on one (1) Chroma test station during Phase II via Task Order II of Contract FA8128-17-D- 0004. In this SOW, contractor shall develop the capability to test the rest of the 18 CCAs (A3, A4, A5, A6, A7, A8, A9, A10, A11, A12, A13, A14, A15, A20, PS1, PS2, PS3, and PS5) within the INE.
b. Contractor shall procure an additional SRU Chroma test stand to support remanufacture.
i. The additional Chroma test stand shall have identical set up/software including
Test Program Set (TPS) as the 1st Chroma test stand and both stations shall have the capability to test all 21 CCAs as listed on paragraph a. in section 2.2.2 above.
It shall maintain the original test logic as well as test criteria/parameters while developing these tests. Contractor shall ensure the SRU tester has the ability to collect test data and record test result in electronic format.
c. The contractor shall develop a test plan and test procedure for all new CCAs for new SRU tester per Government CTA requirement. The contractor shall update test plan as needed, be ready to respond to comments or meet, to discuss comments, with either CTA, SRB or TRB if needed (CDRL A001 - Test Report, CDRL A002
– Test Plan, CDRL A003 – Test Procedure).
d. Contractor shall host Test Readiness Review (TRR) approximately 6-10 business days prior to the start of testing (CDRL A004 – Conference minutes). The SRB, TRB, and CTA approvals are required before TRR can begin.
e. Contractor shall conduct two (2) TIMs at contractor facility one to present the test results from the new SRU tester and one for the TRR (CDRL A005 – Conference Agenda; CDRL A004 – Conference Minutes; CDRL A006 –Briefing Material).
f. Contractor shall prepare a sell-off of the station and its TPS once they are done developing the hardware and software to test all 21 CCAs within the INE. The sell-off shall meet all the requirement listed in INE TRD, document number 403548.
The sell-off shall include a first good end-to-end run, then fault insertion on each of the 21 known-bad SRUs, then follow on with a known-good end-to-end run without fault at the final check out. All final test print-out shall be provided to be deemed successful sell-off.
2.3 SHIPPING DOCUMENTATION
2.3.1 The Contractor shall ensure the appropriate tag is attached to each item generated.
a. Serviceable tags/labels are DD 1574/1574-1 (Yellow)
b. Unserviceable (repairable) tags/labels are DD 1577-2/1577-3 (Green)
c. Unserviceable (condemned) tags/labels are DD 1577/1577-1 (Red)
d. Suspended tags/labels are DD 1575/1575-1 (Brown)
2.3.2 Shipments under this contract shall be by Commercial Bill of Lading (CBL) by the fastest traceable means.
2.3.3 Items remanufactured as a result of a quality deficiency shall be shipped at the Contractor’s expense.
2.4 DELIVERY SCHEDULE
2.4.1 One hundred percent (100%) of end items listed in the preface sheet shall be delivered IAW the contractual delivery schedule. The Contractor shall meet the delivery schedule indicated in the contract.
2.5 SURGE
2.5.1 In the event that the DoD experiences an unplanned spike or sudden increase in demand, due to major theater warfare or a national emergency (also known as surge), and invokes surge: The Contractor is willing to work to meet and sustain this demand for quantity levels above and beyond normal peacetime requirements. After being notified of the surge demand in writing, the Contractor may see additional orders and/or will see the priority status elevated on current orders. The Contractor may do one or more of the following to fill the demand:
a. Add additional shifts to increase production within the Contractor and with suppliers.
b. The Contractor shall work with the approved component part manufacturers to expedite production.
2.5.2 DoD shall be notified in advance of, and be given the opportunity to negotiate, any expedite charges that might apply at the time of surge. Contractual requirements for production of this contract are addressed in Part I. The schedule and surge requirements shall be on a best-effort basis.
2.6 OVER AND ABOVE
2.6.1 Over and above shall only be considered for work discovered during the course of performing remanufacture that is within the general scope of the SOW and not covered by the line items for the basic work. Over and above work discovered must be necessary to satisfactorily complete the scope of this SOW. Identification of missing parts must be revealed within two (2) business days after the asset is removed from the shipping container and reported to the Contracting Officer through the ACO in the form of a Supply Discrepancy Report. Approval from the Contracting Officer shall be obtained PRIOR to performing any over and above work. The Government shall be the sole authority to determine whether over and above is appropriate. The following are examples of over and above, however not an all-encompassing list:
a. Unacceptable quality audits relating to the INE
b. Items Beyond Economical Repair (including -2 part numbers)
c. Aging and Surveillance findings not yet included into the negotiated remanufacture price
d. Disposal Costs
e. Shipping Containers (repair, modification, and/or replacement)
f. Missing components or for components damaged due to causes unrelated to the normal use of the end item
2.7 BEYOND ECONOMICAL REMANUFACTURE
2.7.1 The Contractor shall determine and report end items that will be BER before 50% of the remanufactured unit price in accordance with perspective ordering periods. The Contractor shall report condemnation candidates to the PCO within 10 calendar days of discovery. The Contractor shall not condemn reparable or recoverable items without prior approval of the PCO. The Contractor shall ensure items, which are unable to be remanufactured, are disposed of in accordance with (IAW) the Contractor’s Government-approved property procedures. The Government reserves the right to accept or reject the BER assessment by the Contractor.
2.7.2 The disposition of condemned items will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the PCO or ACO.
2.7.3 On units approved to be condemned by the Government, the Contractor is authorized to retain serviceable parts scrapped from the condemned unit. The cannibalized parts shall be retained by the Contractor for use in repair of the same type end item and on the same contract. These parts will not be replenished when used up.
2.7.4. Beyond physical repair (i.e. remanufacture) items are due to obsolescent or limited parts available to complete a remanufacture. On units approved to be condemned by the Government, the Contractor is authorized to retain serviceable parts scrapped from the condemned unit. The cannibalized parts shall be retained by the Contractor for use in repair of the same type end item and on the same contract. These parts will not be replenished when used up.
2.8 QUALITY ACCEPTANCE AND PROCESSING.
2.8.1 Quality acceptance of each end item shall be performed prior to packaging and transportation. Quality acceptance shall be performed by DCMA at the remanufacture site. Quality acceptance documentation for each end item shall be maintained by the Contractor as part of the item document package. Each end item identified as serviceable shall be delivered to the Government defect free.
2.8.2 Following quality acceptance by DCMA, the Contractor shall notify the Logistic in writing of the completion of remanufactured end items. The Logistic will provide shipping instructions to the Contractor in writing for each end item produced.
Within one day of shipment, the Contractor shall provide proof of shipment through delivery of an accepted WAWF Receiving Report to the Logistic. The Receiving Report shall include the carrier and tracking number.
2.9 END ITEM IDENTIFICATION AND MARKING
2.9.1 Permanently and legibly mark each remanufactured end item with the Contractor’s CAGE and date of remanufacture. This identification shall be permanently affixed to the end item by stamp, stencil, or similar means.
2.9.2 Item Unique Identification (IUID) will be added to the end item in accordance with the following:
a. Specification requirements for IUID marking will be contained in the, Specific Work Requirements appendix, approved engineering drawing, or a Government provided Engineering Order (EO) (AF Forms 3925, 3926 and 3927) as applicable.
b. IUID markings are required for the end-item only. IUID for subcomponents is only required if specifically identified in the, Specific Work Requirements appendix, approved engineering drawing, or a Government provided Engineering Order.
c. For items that do not have IUID marking specifications as stated in paragraph b., the Contractor shall develop the marking specifications in accordance with the current revision of MIL-STD-130. Location and marking method shall be approved by the Cognizant Government Engineer, AFNWC/NDM before implementation. If the Contractor cannot meet the terms and conditions in the contract for IUID, the Contractor will contact the PCO/ACO for determination.
d. IUID markings currently in place on items undergoing repair shall be protected from damage or removal during repair. Verify 2-D matrix IUID markings are readable per TO 00-25-260. Should IUID marking be rendered unreadable during repair, the Contractor shall notify 424 SCMS engineering and the PCO/ACO for determination of how to replace the IUID mark.
e. The Contractor shall submit the required and applicable contingent data for
Legacy items to the IUID Registry per the data submission procedures at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/data_submission_informatio n.html.
f. The Contractor shall submit IUID data for repaired items that require IUID based http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/data_submission_information.html http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/uid/data_submission_information.html on the DFARS clause 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, as prescribed in DFARS Subpart 211.274.
2.10 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
2.10.1 The Contractor shall hold monthly meetings up to the first 12 months of performance. The contractor shall provide briefing materials for those meetings covering all activities, risks, issues, opportunities, and schedule for the performance period. (CDRL A005 - Conference Agenda; CDRL A004 - Conference Minutes;
CDRL A006 - Briefing Material).
2.10.2 The contractor shall provide the monthly production status report for up to the first 12 months of performance and quarterly reports on year two (2) to year fourteen
(14) of the contract. The report shall include the result of ATP, production status, fund spending status, any issue/concern with the production line, etc. (CDRL A007
- Contractor's Progress, Status and Management Report).
SECTION 3: GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
3.1 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY
3.1.1 The Contractor shall furnish all material, support equipment, tools, test equipment, and services not previously furnished by the Government. Government Furnished Material will not be provided unless donor material is provided. Government Furnished Equipment will not be provided other than the equipment from table 3.1, which will be transferred from the INE Repair contract, FA8119-17-C-0003, upon completion.
Part Serial Description MFG Qty
880200-0035 0335 STANDARD INU NORTHROP
GRUMMAN
333790-0001 500001 COREMEMORY
TESTER
NORTHROP
GRUMMAN
333791-0001 500001 MEMORYTESTER
CONSOLE
NORTHROP
GRUMMAN
333793-0001 500001 INTERFACE PANEL NORTHROP
GRUMMAN
333794-0001 500001 COMPUTER NORTHROP
GRUMMAN
E3633A MY40011716 POWER SUPPLY, DC AGILENT
TECHNOLOGIES
E3633A MY40011910 POWER SUPPLY, DC AGILENT
TECHNOLOGIES
E3633A MY40011909 POWER SUPPLY, DC AGILENT
TECHNOLOGIES
TE213688-1 500001 MEMTEST FIXTURE NORTHROP
GRUMMAN
P3005 CNR1B04403 PRINTERLASERJET NORTHROP
GRUMMAN
3.2 DISPOSITION OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY
3.2.1 These instructions apply to all Government owned property. Within ninety (90) business days prior to contract expiration, the Contractor shall submit a letter to the managing ALC requesting disposition instructions in the transfer of Government furnished property (GFP). A list identifying GFP shall include the NSN, part number/CAGE, noun, quantity, condition code, and dollar value shall be submitted through the ACO to the PMS for disposition instructions.
3.2.2 If a follow-on contract is being awarded or is in the negotiation or solicitation stage, the existing GFP may be retained to the extent required to support the current contract and/or follow-on contract.
3.2.3 The Contractor shall comply with preservation, packaging, and packing instructions as specified in the basic contract and/or on the AFMC Form 158, Packaging Requirements.
3.2.4 The contractor shall comply with the Transportation Data on the DD Form 1653 and Transportation Appropriations Form when returning government property.
3.3 DISCREPANCIES INCIDENT TO SHIPMENT
3.3.1 Discrepancies incident to shipment include misidentified items, variations in quantity, non-requisitioned items, lost or damaged parcel post, and items in dubious condition.
These discrepancies shall be reported and resolved using the DoD web-based applications AF WebSDR link located within the CAV AF system described in the CAV AF SOW.
This system of reporting a Supply Discrepancy Report (SDR), formerly called a Report of Discrepancy (ROD), has been developed in compliance with DoDM 4140.01-V1 and DLM 4000.25, which requires automated SDR processing. In those instances where the SDR initiator is unable to gain access to the AF WebSDR, continued use of manual forms (SF Form 364) is permitted. A copy of the form shall be forwarded through the PCO and DCMA QAR for corrective action.
3.3.2 Transportation discrepancies and item transaction discrepancies shall be coordinated with the DCMA Property Administrator and ACO immediately upon discovery for corrective action in addition to AF WebSDR submittal.
3.3.3 Contract line items received with missing components (mission on induction (MOI)), the contractor shall process a SDR (SF Form 364) immediately upon discovery in accordance with AFI 23-101 and provide a copy of submitted MOI SDR form to the ACO and PCO within five business days of discovery.
3.3.4 Misdirected shipments of GFP shall be immediately reported by telephone to the DCMA
Property Administrator followed by written notification within three work days. The DCMA Property Administrator will issue appropriate disposition instructions for the misdirected items. Misdirected items received by the contractor which are not part of this contract will not be receipted into CAV AF.
3.4 FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT AUDIT READINESS (FIAR)
3.4.1 This contingency support may be required during this contract and will encompass tasks to transition and maintain compliance with DoD Financial Improvement and Audit Readiness (FIAR) requirements associated with all reportable GFP. Effort will include inventory verification, validation, reconciliation and audit assistance, cataloging of parts, material, Support Equipment (SE), tools and test equipment, National Stock Number (NSN) cross reference research, database entry, Air Force Equipment Management System (AFEMS) or successor system data entry/management, and production of all FIAR mandated reports. (CDRL A008 – Recurring Inventory Report)
3.4.2 GFP Reporting
a. The contractor shall deliver the annual GFP report encompassing all Government Furnished Material (GFM) and Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) in the contractor’s possession (CDRL A009 – GFP Report).
3.5 OTHER
3.5.1 The contractor shall not obtain GFP through the utilization of requisition codes assigned exclusively to this contract for any other contracts.
3.5.2 The contractor shall not transfer GFP charged to this contract to any other contract, or contractor, or activity without the advance approval of the PM through the PCO.
3.5.3 The government reserves the right to withdraw any GFP in possession of the contractor to supply other urgent USAF requirements. If any item so removed by the government is still required to complete the contract, the contractor shall take appropriate action to replace the removed item.
SECTION 4: APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
4.1 APPLICABLE TECHNICAL ORDERS
4.1.1 Specific Technical Orders
PART NUMBER REMANUFACTURE
MANUAL/TO
NUMBER
TITLE/REVISION AND/OR
OTHER DIRECTIVES (AFTO
FORM 252)
750600-0002, 3, 4
Contractor Owned, Provided
Contractor may use current OEM proprietary documentation.
4.1.2 General Technical Orders
TO
DATE TITLE
00-5-1 On-line version is considered to be most up to date
AF TECHNICAL ORDER SYSTEM
https://www.tinker.af.mil/Home/Technical-Orders/
00-5-3 On-line version is considered to be most up to date
AF TECHNICAL ORDER LIFE CYCLE
MANAGEMENT
https://www.tinker.af.mil/Home/Technical-Orders/
00-35D-54 On-line version is considered to be most up to date
USAF DEFICIENCY REPORTING, INVESTIGATION
AND RESOLUTION
https://www.tinker.af.mil/Home/Technical-Orders/
00-25-260 On-line version is considered to be most up to date
Asset Marking and Tracking Item Unique Identification (IUID) Marking Procedures www.robins.af.mil/Portals/59/documents/technicalorders/ 00-25-260.pdf?ver=2018-08-15-093438-833
4.1.3 Military Specifications, Standards, Handbooks, and Government Standards
4.1.4 DoD/Air Force Forms
FORM NUMBER TITLE
SF 364 REPORT OF DISCREPANCY
SF 368 QUALITY DEFICIENCY REPORT
AFMC 158 PACKAGING REQUIREMENTS
AF 3925 ENGINEERING ORDER
AF 3926
ENGINEERING ORDER (CONTINUATION SHEET)
AF 3927 ENGINEERING ORDER, PARTS LIST CHANGES
AFMC 202 NON-CONFORMING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
REQUEST AND REPLY
AFMC 807 RECOMMENDED QUALITY ASSURACNE PROVISIONS
AND SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS
DD1574
DD1574-1
SERVICEABLE TAG –
MATERIEL SERVICEABLE
LABEL – MATERIEL
DD1577
DD1577-1
DD1577-2
DD1577-3
UNSERVICEABLE (CONDEMNED) TAG –
MATERIEL UNSERVICEABLE (CONDEMNED)
LABEL – MATERIEL
UNSERVICEABLE (REPAIRABLE) TAG –
MATERIEL UNSERVICEABLE (REPAIRABLE)
LABEL – MATERIEL
DD1575
DD1575-1
SUSPENDED TAG – MATERIEL
SUSPENDED LABEL – MATERIEL
DD1653 TRANSPORTATION DATA FOR SOLICITATIONS
NUMBER DATE TITLE
MIL-STD-130N 16 Nov 2012 Identification Marking of U.S. Military Property
MIL-HDBK-61 7 Feb 2001 Configuration Management Guidance
AS5553 16 Nov 2012 Overarching DOD Counterfeit Prevention Guidance
4.2 OTHER PUBLICATIONS FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY
NOTE: These publications are for information purposes only.
4.2.1 Air Force Manuals
DOCUMENT
NUMBER
DATE TITLE
AFI 23-101 On-line version is considered to be most up to date
AIR FORCE MATERIAL
MANAGEMENT
http://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a4_7/publication/afi23- 101/afi23-101.pdf
DLM 4000.25,
Volume 2 On-line version is considered to be most up to date
REPORTING OF SUPPLY
DISCREPANCIES
4.3 CONTRACTOR DOCUMENTS
PART NUMBER DRAWING NUMBER TITLE AND DATE
750600 N/A N/A
| PREFACE SHEET |
| REVISION SHEET |
| SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION |
| 1.1. DEFINITIONS |
| The following definitions are applicable to this SOW: |
| i. End Item: An end item is a complete piece of Government equipment as listed in Government supply catalogs and suitable for Government storage and issue. End items may contain one or more Shop Replaceable Unit (SRUs). End items are also referred to ... |
| ii. Initial Production Evaluation: IPE is a planned Government review of early production items and processes to evaluate a Contractor’s ability to complete the work in accordance with (IAW) the agreement, applicable technical orders, and other guidan... |
| iii. Remanufacture: An end item remanufacture as described within this SOW is the action taken to return the end item to a like-new condition. This remanufacture process is consistent with the provisions of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 22.100... |
| iv. Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO): A contracting officer assigned the responsibility for the post award functions related to the administration of a Government contract in the field. The ACO is normally located in the Defense Contract Manag... |
| v. Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO): The individual authorized to enter into contract for supplies on behalf of the Government by formal advertising or negotiation and who is responsible for overall procurement of the contract. |
| vi. Technical Order (TO): An Air Force publication that gives specific technical directives and information with respect to the inspection, storage, operation, modification, and maintenance of Government equipment. |
| vii. Support Equipment (SE): All equipment called out is required for LRU, SRU, and component test, remanufacture, and/or modification. |
| viii. Serviceable: An item is considered serviceable if it is capable of meeting the functional and test requirements for which designed or modified as established by the applicable technical documentation in section 2. |
| ix. Repair: An end item repair is the action taken to return the end item to a serviceable condition by replacing all exposed consumable items and only the damaged recoverable parts that do not meet the inspection criteria. Repair consists of end item... |
| x. Defect: A characteristic that does not conform to the specified requirements. |
| xi. Product Quality Deficiency: Any defect or nonconforming condition. Included are deficiencies in design, specification, material, manufacturing, and workmanship. |
| xii. Product Quality Deficiency Report (PQDR): The SF 368 form or format used to record and transmit product quality deficiency data. |
| xiii. Consumable Part: Piece parts that are not typically reused during remanufacture. |
| xiv. Re-usable Component: Non-accountable, expendable part or assembly that may be re-installed in an end item after inspection/repair and deemed serviceable. |
| xv. Recoverable Component: Accountable, non-expendable part or sub-assembly of an end item. Also referred to as a SRU. SRUs may be re-installed in an end item after inspection/repair and deemed serviceable. If applicable to the scope of this SOW, SRUs... |
| 1.2. PRE-AWARD SURVEY REQUIREMENTS |
| 1.3. INITIAL PRODUCTION EVALUATION (IPE) REQUIREMENTS |
| 1.4. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS |
| Reporting requirements are specified in the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL). |
| 1.5. RECORDS MANAGEMENT |
| 1.5.1 The Contractor shall maintain and produce as requested by the government, for seven years a document package containing the following documentation for each end item produced: |
| a. Test Acceptance Review Documentation |
| b. Parts replaced listed by each serial numbered end item remanufactured |
| 1.6. QUALITY PROGRAM AND INSPECTION SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS |
| 1.6 |
| 1.6.1 The Contractor shall establish, document, and maintain a quality system as a means of ensuring that the end item conforms to specified requirements. The quality system shall be in accordance with contract requirements. |
| 1.6.2 When a Deficiency Report is received for an end item remanufactured under the terms of this contract, the Contractor shall comply with the ACO’s directions to be provided in TO 00-35D-54, USAF Deficiency Reporting, Investigation, and Resolution. |
| 1.6.3 The Contractor shall report any Government furnished property, for the work accomplished as outlined in this SOW, that is damaged or otherwise unsuitable for use to the PCO using a Quality Deficiency Report (QDR), SF Form 368. |
| 1.6.4 The Contractor shall support quality audits as required by the ACO These audits could require that one or more end items be removed from the production line and subjected to any combination of inspection, testing, disassembly, or assembly to det... |
| 1.6.5 The Contractor shall support quality assurance reviews to be conducted at the site of remanufacture at the request of the Government throughout the contract period IAW AS9100 Aerospace Standard. |
| 1.6.6 The Contractor shall support a quality acceptance review by the DCMA representative at the site of work as specified in this SOW for each end item generated under the terms of this contract. |
| 1.6.7 Contractor Requests for deviation/waiver shall be submitted to the PCO or delegated authority. Work shall not be initiated on assemblies/components affected by deviation/waiver pending approval/disapproval. Requests shall include the contract nu... |
| 1.7. CONDEMNATION CANDIDATES |
| 1.7 |
| 1.7.1 The Contractor shall not condemn reparable or recoverable items without prior approval of the PCO. The Contractor shall ensure non-remanufactured items are disposed of IAW the Contractor’s Government-approved property procedures. |
| 1 |
| 1.6 |
| 1.6.1 |
| 1.7.2 The disposition of condemned items will be determined on a case-by-case basis by the PCO. |
| 1.7.3 On units approved to be condemned by the Government, the Contractor is authorized to retain serviceable parts scrapped from the condemned unit. The cannibalized parts shall be retained by the Contractor for use in remanufacture of the same type... |
| 1.8. TOOLS AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) |
| 1 |
| 1.7 |
| 1.8.1 The SE required to accomplish the scope of work to be completed on end items under this contract are the responsibility of the contractor to furnish. |
| 1.8.3 Support Equipment Calibration Requirements. The contractor shall ensure documentation certifying the accuracy of all calibrated SE is made available to the PCO prior to work being performed. The contractor shall ensure SE calibration is maintai... |
| a. SE part number and serial number |
| b. Date calibrated |
| c. Calibration due date |
| d. Calibration source |
| e. Calibration procedure used |
| f. Verification of full performance compliance IAW this SOW for SE items not requiring calibration |
| 1.9. PRECIOUS METALS RECOVERY PROGRAM |
| 1.9.1 The Precious Metals Recovery Program is not applicable to this SOW. The handling and control of precious metals shall be IAW AFI 23-101, Air Force Materiel Management, if necessary. |
| 1.10. NUCLEAR REQUIREMENTS |
| 1.10.1 Nuclear Hardness. The Contractor shall notify the PCO if the work may have an impact to the nuclear hardness of the item within one (1) business day of determination. The Contractor shall not continue remanufacture actions until Government app... |
| 1.11. PARTS CONTROL PROGRAM |
| b. The Contractor shall keep records to allow traceability of sourcing of replacement parts for each end item remanufactured. These records shall be furnished for inspection upon Government request. |
| 1.11.2 Approval from the PCO is required for the Contractor to use any parts not contained in the approved OEM parts list. The Contractor shall maintain configuration of items worked under the scope of this contract as identified in this SOW. The Co... |
| 1.11.3 The Contractor shall only use replacement parts purchased directly from the end item OEM or from identical Reference Measuring Unit & Computer (RMUC) parts. In the event that parts are not available from either of these two sources for a pendin... |
| 1.11.4 Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP). The Contractor shall participate in the GIDEP practices described below in accordance with the DOD- wide practices outlined in Topic 26A of the Defense Acquisition Deskbook (DAD). The Contracto... |
| 1.12 COUNTERFEIT PREVENTION PLAN |
| 1.12.1 Counterfeit Prevention Plan (CPP). Contractors that supply electronic parts or systems that contain electronic parts shall establish policies and procedures to avoid, detect, mitigate and disposition counterfeit electronic parts to prevent such... |
| 1.12.2 These policies and procedures shall be documented in a CPP for submission and in accordance with Data Item Description (DID) (DI-MISC-81832) and accomplished for all specified contract items. DI-MISC-81832 is applicable to Parts, Material and P... |
| 1.13 OZONE DEPLETING SUBSTANCES |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .