Attch 4 Contractor Capability Survey.pdf

Attachment 4 CONTRACTOR CAPABILITY SURVEY

Part I. Business Information (limit to 2 pages)

Please provide the following business information for your company/institution and for any teaming or joint venture partners:

1. Company/Institution Name:

2. Address:

3. Point of Contact:

4. CAGE Code:

5. Unique Entity ID (UEI):

6. Phone Number:

7. E-mail address:

8. Web Page URL:

9. List of any Government wide multiple award contracts held (i.e. Oasis, Federal Supply/Professional Services

Schedules, etc.)

10. Size of business pursuant to North American Classification System (NAICS) Code: 336412 Aircraft Engine and Engine Parts Manufacturing, Size Standard: 1,500 employees.

Based on the above NAICS Code, state whether your company is:

• Small Business (Yes / No)

• Women-Owned Small Business (Yes / No)

• Small Disadvantaged Business (Yes / No)

• 8(a) Certified (provide end date) (Yes / No)

• HUBZone Certified (Yes / No)

• Veteran-Owned Small Business (Yes / No)

• Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (Yes / No)

A statement as to whether your company is domestically or foreign owned (if foreign, please indicate the country of ownership).

Part II. Capability Survey Questions (limit to 7 pages)

1. Describe the capabilities of your company/facility and the nature of the services you provide. Include a description of your staff composition and management structure, highlighting education, training and experience with these types of requirements. Identify any industry and/or DoD recognition and certification received within the past five years.

2. Demonstrate your ability and experience for the same or similar services and/or manufacturing, which your company currently provides (or have provided within the last three years) to the commercial and/or military environment. Include:

a. Contract Number

b. Brief Description of Work Performed

c. Period of Performance

d. Agency/Organization Supported

e. Point of Contact (name and email of Contracting Officer or Program Manager).

3. Describe your company process for maintaining inventory records (Government Furnished Property / Contractor

Acquired Property) and reporting on hand/in work balance and status to your customer.

4. What Quality Management System and process improvement practices does your company employ? Please provide a description of your quality program (ISO 9001, AS9100, etc.)

5. Describe your company’s capabilities for generating, handling, processing and storing classified material and data. If your business or employees conducted or received security protocols audits or inspections (internal and/or external) within the past five years, please provide the rating/results.

6. Commerciality:

a. Are there established catalog or market prices for these types of services?

b. If you offer these services to both the U.S. Government and commercial sources, do the same employees provide the offered services to both U.S. Government and commercial sources?

c. Do you offer these types of services to both entities under similar terms and conditions?

i. If not, briefly describe any differences.

7. Is your company interested in possible subcontracting opportunities? IF so, please describe in detail what part(s) of this requirement your company is capable or interested in performing.

a. If your company cannot provide these services in their entirety, what solution would you offer to the Government to accomplish the tasks your company cannot perform? (examples: partner/subcontract to another vendor(s).

8. Small Business Capabilities:

a. What requirements of this potential contract described above are best suited for small businesses?

b. Detail specific past teaming arrangements, i.e. partnering, joint ventures, etc. Identify ways the

Government can enhance teaming arrangement opportunities.

c. Describe and detail subcontracting opportunities, by function and percentage of contract value that are appropriate for small business concerns.

d. The Government may require the successful offeror to track and report contract dollars awarded to small business which can be attributed directly to this contract award. Could your company track actual contract dollars awarded to Small Business relating exclusively to this effort? This tracking initiative will be in addition to corporate/company-wide small business reporting.

e. From your perspective, what is a reasonable percentage of the F-100 contract effort that could be subcontracted to small business?

9. Industry Specific Questions:

a. Are you interested in the requirement as a REPAIR/OH/REMAN source or a New Manufacture source or both?

b. From the list of National Stock Numbers (NSN) and Part Numbers (P/Ns) provided, what NSNs/PNs is your company qualified by Air Force SAR approval process.

c. From the list of NSNs/PNs, what NSNs/PNs is your company not qualified, but would consider getting qualified for to perform on this IDIQ.

i. Would your company consider getting qualified by Air Force SAR approval process on the NSNs/PNs if the IDIQ had the option for first article testing or an initial production evaluation.

ii. You must have a AF SAR for each NSN you intend to bid on.

d. Does your company have current capability to access demand data for Pratt & Whitney F100 engine parts? If not, provide details explaining how your company will overcome the inability to access.

e. Does your company have current capability to access repair data for Pratt & Whitney F100 engine and parts? If not, provide details explaining how your company will overcome the inability to access.

f. Identify and describe risks you perceive on this potential contract for:

Subcontract management

1) Spares support/inventory

2) Supply chain management

3) Configuration management

4) Program management

5) Personnel training

6) Engine support

7) Contract Phase in

g. For the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM) or the companies that own data rights, the Government wants to establish an order under the MAC to assist in developing sources for NSNs/PNs. If the company develops a new source(s) and those source(s) are awarded orders, then the Government would pay a royalty or license fee to the data right owner. What is industries feedback on this type of contractual arrangement? Would the OEMs or data rights owners be interested in this type of arrangement? What would preclude your company from entering into this type of arrangement?

10. Contract Specific Questions:

a. Period of Performance. The Government is contemplating a 10 year contract consisting of a five year base and five (1) one year ordering periods. There are planned ordering periods within the base and ordering period for pricing purposes. The Government plans for Offerors to provide ceiling prices that will be maintained on the IDIQ. This means the Offerors proposed price on an order cannot exceed its ceiling price. There will be increments of time when Offerors can revise their ceiling prices. Price competition will occur on each task order where the price will be established.

1. The Government is considering either a one or two year increment for ceiling prices. What is your company's concerns with a one or two year increment?

2. What elements of cost would your company want the ability to revise for ceiling prices, such as labor, material, overhead, G&A, etc.

3. What are your concerns regarding this period of performance?

4. How long is your typical contractual arrangement established with vendors and subcontractors?

5. What length of contract would be preferred to help amortize the cost expended for a spares pool?

b. Contract Transition Period: The Government is contemplating a 120-day contract transition period. How long of a transition period do you think would be adequate for the contract startup?

11. Industry Day:

a. Would your company be interested in attending an industry day? The amount of interested parties will determine if the Government will have an industry day.

12. Incentives: To foster a mutually beneficial partnership, we are considering various incentive structures to reward superior performance and innovation. We are particularly interested in your feedback on the following potential incentives:

a. Award fees based on performance against specific criteria.

b. Incentive fees tied to achieving cost, schedule, or technical performance targets

c. Sharing saving programs

Please provide your perspective on the effectiveness and feasibility of these incentives and suggest any additional incentive structures you believe would be valuable.

13. Forecasting and demand: We believe a shared understanding of forecasting and demand is crucial. How can we best capture and utilize your knowledge in our forecasting discussions?

14. Additional Comments:

a. Please provide additional comments you would like the Government to consider as an important factor of this market research survey/RFI.