USAF_DID_80229D_TO_Improvement_Report.pdf

PDF 14 KB Posted

Attached to
F100-220 Combustion Chambers Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA8121-19-R-0003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center Tinker Air Force Base

About this file

This document contains a Data Item Description for a Technical Order Improvement Report and its requirements. It outlines the format and content for reports generated by contractors responsible for operating and maintaining Air Force equipment according to published Technical Orders. Key details include requiring the report to be submitted on AFTO Form 22 and include identification information like the Technical Order and report numbers in specified blocks, a brief summary of any TO deficiencies and recommended changes in Block 11A, and impact estimates of any cost or time savings in Blocks 11B and 11C. Approval signatures are required from the initiator, supervisor, and Product Improvement Manager in Blocks 12 through 14. No action is taken in Block 15 unless the recommendation would change contract scope or cost. Part II is then completed by the Air Force to evaluate the improvement report.

In addition, the related federal contract opportunity seeks combustion chambers for the F100-220 engine. Key details that can be discerned are it pertains to solicitation number FA8121-19-R-0003 for F100-220 Combustion Chambers issued by the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Lifecycle Management Center at Tinker Air Force Base.

USAF DID 80229

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to F100-220 Combustion Chambers, newest first.
File Type Posted
Response_to_Ktr_questions_REV_4.pdf PDF
FA812119R0003_______0003.pdf PDF
Response_to_Ktr_questions_REV_3.pdf PDF
Response_to_Ktr_question_on_Amend_0001.pdf PDF
Response_to_Ktr_question_on_Amend_0001.pdf PDF
USAF_packaging.pdf PDF
FMS_Transportation.pdf PDF
SOW_Rev2.pdf PDF
FA812119R0003_______0001.pdf PDF
USAF_Special_Packaging_Instructions.pdf PDF
Pricing_Matrix_Updated.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
USAF_Transportation.pdf PDF
FMS_Packaging.pdf PDF
Response_to_contractor_Questions_RFP_FA8121-19-R-0003.pdf PDF
USAF_DID_81995_CDM_Report.pdf PDF
USAF_DID_81534A_TDR.pdf PDF
FMS_CDRLandDIDs.PDF PDF
USAF_DID_81634C_CAVAF.pdf PDF
USAF_DID_81535A_DR.pdf PDF
USAF_DID_81324C_CEMS_Report.pdf PDF
USAF_CDRL.pdf PDF
FA812119R0003.pdf PDF
Pricing_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RevisedSOW31Aug17_.pdf PDF
GFM_USAF1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
FA812119R0003.pdf PDF
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DATA ITEM DESCRIPTION

Title: Technical Order Improvement Report and Reply Number: DI-TMSS-80229D Approval Date: 19991006 AMSC Number: F7356 Limitation: N/A DTIC Applicable: N/A GIDEP Applicable: N/A Office of Primary Responsibility: F–MSG/ILMP Applicable Forms: AFTO Form 22 Use/relationship: a. This Data Item Description contains the format and content preparation in-structions for the data product generated by the specific and discrete task requirement as delineated in the contract.

b. This item is applicable to contracts where the contractor is responsible for operating and main-taining Air Force centrally-acquired and managed equipment according to procedures in published TOs. Additional information and guidance is contained in TO 00-5-1, available through the Internet at http://www.pdsm.wpafb.af.mil/toprac/to-syste.htm under the link to “Technical Orders.”

c. This data item supersedes DI-TMSS-80229C.

Requirements:

1. Format. Paper or electronic format (EF) AFTO Form 22, Technical Order Improvement Report and Reply, or message/e-mail containing the same information. Electronic forms are available from the web site listed above.

2. Content.

2.1. REPORT DATE. The date the Improvement Report Number is assigned.

2.2. Block 1, TO (Major Command or Equivalent). The complete address of the Administrative or Procuring Contracting Officer (ACO/PCO).

2.3 Block 2, TO (T.O. Manager). The address of the TO Manager responsible for the deficient TO as indicated in the TO Index. (Addresses are available on the Air Force TO System Information Internet Page, http://www.pdsm.wpafb.af.mil/toprac/to-syste.htm.)

2.4. Block 3, FROM (Product Improvement Manager or Equivalent). The address of the reporting organization's Quality Assurance function which reviewed and approved the form for submission.

2.5. Block 4, TECHNICAL ORDER DATA. The Technical Order Number (Record Positions (rp) 6-30) and the Improvement Report Number (rp 31-45). Only one character is used in each position.

Rp 5 is left blank. Capital letters and slashed zeros ( /0) (if completing by hand) are used. Specific entry formats:

a. TECHNICAL ORDER NUMBER. The basic TO number (only) as it appears on the title page. Parentheses and dashes are used, but not blanks. Unused positions through rp 30 are left blank. When a change affects a TO supplement, the supplement’s number is referenced in block 11A.

b. IMPROVEMENT REPORT NUMBER. All positions (rp 31-45) are alpha-numeric char-acters (only). Rp 31 is a pre-printed “2.” Rps 32-33 will be “4N” to indicate contractor submission.

Rps 34-38 will be the contractor’s Commercial And Government Entity (CAGE) code number from the H4/H8 cataloging handbooks. Rps 39-40 may be used for internal identification or may be ze-ros. Rp 41 is the last digit of the calendar year. Rps 42-44 are the sequential numbers (starting with

“001”) of the reports submitted in the calendar year. Rp 45 indicates the urgency category of the report (E for Emergency, U for Urgent or R for Routine – see TO 00-5-1 for definitions).

2.6. Block 5, BASIC DATE OF T.O. The first date appearing on the lower right corner of the TO Title page.

2.7. Block 6, DATE/NO. OF CHANGE. The change number and date, if any, appear just under the TO's basic date on the title page. If there is no change listed, block 6 may be left blank or have N/A entered.

2.8. Block 7, PAGE NUMBER. The first page affected by the proposed change. Additional pages should be indicated in Block 11A. For work cards, the routine number and card number (e.g., TR3.1, Card 2 of 3).

2.9. Block 8, PARAGRAPH NO. The number of the paragraph to be changed or which precedes added material, the grid number for microfiche, or the System/Subsystem/Subject Numbers (S/S/SN) for manuals using this system. When multiple paragraphs are affected, the range (e.g., 5-1 thru 5-5).

2.10. Block 9, FIGURE NO. Used when illustrations or tables are involved. "Table" is used before the number if applicable.

2.11. Block 10, AFTO 22 TYPE. Two check boxes indicating whether the AFTO Form 22 is being submitted to make a Correction to the TO (see TO 00-5-1, para 5-2.1 for definitions), or an Im-provement to procedures or processes which, while correct as written, can be performed bet-ter/faster/cheaper/safer, etc.

2.12. Block 11A, BRIEF SUMMARY OF DEFICIENCY AND RECOMMENDED CHANGE (Use continuation sheet, if needed). Completed as follows:

a. For work package TO reports, the first entry in this block is "APPLICABLE TO WP NUM- BER xxxxx."

b. Identity of the military system when this is not included in the TO number. If not a system, identity of commodities by Mission/Design/Series (MDS) or Type/Model/Series (TMS) and Na-tional Stock Number (NSN) or part number. Omitted for general purpose Methods & Procedures TOs (MPTOs).

c. Brief description of the TO deficiency and reason for change. When appropriate, identity or copy attached of the source document for changes in voltage, part number and so forth.

d. The recommended changes worded as closely as possible to the exact language which should appear in the corrected TO. If the correction will require engineering research or extensive verification, the type of correction ("Add more in-depth fault isolation procedures.") and a statement such as "Unable to develop at local level."

e. Continuation sheets, if needed, shall show the improvement report number in the upper right hand corner of each sheet. (The EF version of the AFTO Form 22, available from the ACO/PCO, includes a continuation sheet with automatic entry of the improvement report number.)

2.13. Blocks 11B & 11C, SAVINGS/YR – DOLLARS and SAVINGS/YR – MANHOURS. These blocks are for rough order of magnitude (ROM) estimates of annual saving (in dollars and man-hours) resulting from the TO change recommendation. If minimal or no savings are anticipated, leave the blocks blank.

2.14. Block 12, REPORTED BY (Initiator’s Signature, Off Symb, Phone). Signature, printed or typed name, and office symbol of the individual reporting the problem or enhancement. Telephone number (Defense Switched Network (DSN) number preferred, if available) where individual can be contacted during normal duty hours.

2.15. Block 13, APPROVED BY (Supervisor’s Signature, Off Symb/DSN). Same as Block 12 for the initiator’s supervisor.

2.15. Block 14, PIM OR EQUIVALENT (Signature/Off Symbol/DSN). Same as Block 12 for the Product Improvement or Quality Assurance representative who reviews and approves the form for submission.

2.16. Blocks 16 & 17, TO. These blocks contain the same addresses as Blocks 1 and 3. They are auto-filled by the EF version of the form.

3. (Information Only).

3.1. Block 15, MAJOR COMMAND ACTION. Blocks 15A through 15C are left blank unless the reported improvement/correction could cause a change in contract scope or cost. In this case, the blocks are completed by the Procuring or Administrative Contracting Officer (PCO/ACO). Reports are routed through the weapon system’s or commodity’s Lead Command point of contact for review (Blocks 15D through 15F), unless specifically exempted by the Lead Command.

3.2. PART II, Blocks 19 thru 27. Completed by the government during evaluation of the improve-ment report.

End of DI-TMSS-80229D.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .