DS_TAT_RFP_5Qs As-PostedtoFBO27Jun13.xls

XLS spreadsheet 35 KB Posted Jun 27, 2013

Attached to: ESG DS TATs Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number: FA8075-13-R-0001
Issued by: Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

From the source

RFP Questions and Answers

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to ESG DS TATs, newest first.
File	Type	Posted
ppi_tool.accdb	—	Jul 25, 2013
Amendment_02.doc	DOC document	Jul 24, 2013
DS_TAT_RFP_Qs As-PostedtoFBO24Jul13.xls	XLS spreadsheet	Jul 24, 2013
DS_TATs_RFP_Amendment1_PostedtoFBO.doc	DOC document	Jun 27, 2013
FA8075-13-R-0001_Section_J_Attachments_25Jun13.doc	DOC document	Jun 25, 2013
DS_TATs_RFP_25Jun2013.doc	DOC document	Jun 25, 2013
DS_TATs_Draft_RFP_QA_Final_19Jun13.xls	XLS spreadsheet	Jun 19, 2013
DS_TATs_Draft_RFP_QA_Final_2May13.xls	XLS spreadsheet	May 2, 2013
Notice_FedbizOpps_S_B_Director.doc	DOC document	Apr 23, 2013
Draft_RFP_Section_J_Attachments.zip	ZIP file	Feb 20, 2013
DS-TATs_PreSolicitation-Final.doc	DOC document	Feb 20, 2013
DS_TATs_Draft_RFP_19Feb13.doc	DOC document	Feb 19, 2013
DS_TATs_Draft_RFP_Q A.xls	XLS spreadsheet	Feb 19, 2013
PreSolicitation_Notice.docx	DOCX document	Oct 15, 2012

Show all 14

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

DS TAT DRFP Q&A

	DS TATs RFP 5 Questions & Answers			Posted To FBO: 27 Jun 2013
	#	Solicitation Section	Question/Comment	Response
	1	L4.2.6	Question 1 of the draft RFP Q&A posted to FedBizOpps asked: If an Offeror has an IDIQ contract that is not formally assessed at either the TO or IDIQ level, but is able to provide a single point of contact who can verify its performance record for the entire IDIQ, can the contract be cited at the IDIQ level? At the time the Government answered with: We will evaluate it as long as it meets recency and relevancy criteria.	The RFP takes precedence over the Questions and Answers; therefore use the RFP. Specifically Section L4.2.6 of the RFP states: "In instances in which performance is not assessed at either level Offerors shall submit past performance information at the delivery/task order level." Amendment 1 of the RFP has added 7 days to Past Performance Volume II due date.
	2	L1.2	RFP states Volume II Past Performance is due 4:00 PM CST 30 calendar days after RFP release. Should we include the release date in the 30 calendar days (due July 24) or exclude it (due July 25)? Please clarify.	Past Performance is Due 25 July 2013. Amendment 1 of the RFP has added 7 days to the Past Performance Volume II due date and they are now due no later than 4:00pm Central Time on 1 August 2013.
	3	L2.2.2	Hard copies of the report pages generated by the PPI Tool are required to be placed in our Past Performance Volume for submittal. Because these reports are generated by the PPI Tool (in PDF format), Offerors will not be able to format text, margins, spacing, or add headers/footers with page numbering (the PPI Tool automatically page numbers the reports). Because the PPI Tool report dictates the format, Offerors will be unable to comply with the formatting/page numbering/marking requirements in Section L2.2.2.
Will the report pages generated by the PPI Tool be excluded from the since Offerors are unable to change the output from the PPI Tool?	Yes. The EZ Source Past Performance Information (PPI) tool outputs are excluded from the formatting specifications of Section L. See Amendment 1 to the RFP for this change.
	4	L1.2	We wanted to make you aware that Offeror’s responses to the “Brief Description of Effort” field will have some words that are not visible in the hard copy print out. The PPI Tool will print the heading for the “Contract Dollar Value:” field in the middle of the discussion for the “Brief Description of Effort” field (see sample below, this is a screenshot of the actual PDF report based on a dummy record): Our understanding is the PPI Tool is created by a contractor and that, like Offerors, the Contracting Office can’t modify the PPI Tool or how the reports are generated. The Government’s evaluation team will be able to see the full text in the actual Access database file.	That is correct. The Past Performance Information (PPI) tool can not be modified or changed by the Contracting Office. The Government's evaluation team will be able to see the full text in the actual Access database file when evaluated in the electronic source selection tool.
	5	L1.2	There are two reports generated by the PPI Tool: 1) Past Performance Information (PPI) Business Relationships Report (PPI tool report) and 2) Past Performance Information (PPI) Sheets (PPI tool report). The RFP instructions for L4.2.2 only take into account the PPI Sheet Report, allowing 50 pages (10 references with 5 page max each). The Business Relationships Report is not listed. Recommend revising L4.2.2 organization as follows to accommodate the additional required report:	Added the following in amendment 1 of the RFP: Past Performance Information Business Relationships (PPI

tool report) No page limit

Sheet2

Sheet3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.