RFP_Atch6--Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ).pdf

ATTACHMENT 6

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor’s Name:_______________________ Telephone Number:_________________

Address: ____________________________ Fax Number: ___________________________ ____________________________ Point of Contact: ________________________

B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________

C. Contract number: ______________________________________

D. Contract type: _________________________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

1. Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

E G S M U N

Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

Technical Performance E G S M U N

T1 How was the quality of specialized subject matter knowledge and expertise provided to the customer?

T2 How was the quality/integrity of the written/presented work regarding the specialized subject matter (communication, presentations, analysis, reports, etc.)?

T3 How well did the contractor recommend, develop, and implement quality improvement processes, standard business practices related to the specialized subject matter?

Program Management E G S M U N

P1. How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?

P2. How well did the contractor understand/comply with customer objectives and technical requirements?

P3. How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations, if any?

Employee Retention/Attraction E G S M U N

E1. How effectively was the contractor able to hire/apply a certified, qualified workforce to this effort?

E2. How effectively was the contractor able to retain a certified, qualified workforce on this effort?

2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated E/G (Exceptional/Good), S/M (Satisfactory/Marginal) or U/N (Unsatisfactory/Neutral) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___

No ___

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Name: Mrs. Percilla McDuffey

E-Mail to: percilla.mcduffey@us.af.mil