Attachment 3 - Past Performance Information Form.docx
DOCX document 27 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Paving Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA706023R0003
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation form and details of a federal contract opportunity for paving services. The past performance evaluation form is a template for evaluating contractors' performance on prior relevant contracts and captures ratings on a scale of exceptional to unsatisfactory for various performance criteria.
The federal contract opportunity is a pre-solicitation notice for a multiple award indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity paving contract with a total ceiling of $100 million over a potential five-year period. The solicitation will be issued through SAM.gov and is intended to result in five firm-fixed price contracts awarded on a competitive 8(a) small business set-aside basis to contractors whose technical capability and past performance are significantly more important than price. The North American Industry Classification System code for this project is 237310. The solicitation is anticipated to be issued at least 15 days after this notice and funds are not presently available, though no award will be made until funding is in place.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE IAW FAR 3.104 WHEN FILLED IN
FA706023R0003
Attachment 3
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FORM (PPIF)
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Contractor’s Name: __________________ Telephone: __________________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
| __________________________ |
| __________________________ |
Submitting Survey as Prime or Sub-Contractor (please circle one) If submitting as Sub-Contractor, Prime Contractors Name:___________________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
| __________________________ |
| __________________________ |
Project Title and Detailed Description of Work: ______________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name and Title of Evaluator: ____________________________
Company Name: ______________________________________
| Address: _____________________ | Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ | Fax Number: | ______________________ |
| _____________________________ | Email Address: ______________________ |
C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:
11 CONS/PKB
ATTN: Dee Dee Figueroa EMAIL: demetria.figueroa.2@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements with some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
| 14. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
| 17. |
| Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased. |
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
| 19. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government personnel after award. |
| 21. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 23. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.” |
YES/NO
| 24. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES/NO |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: ___________________ CONTRACT NUMBER ______________
Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .