Form_5.xfdl

F9E408A8-4706-4D6A-9E0B-B42AE7BE35AF

2.16.6

28/1/2008 permit

IBM Lotus Forms Designer

960;1260

81D9E626-E264-4EAA-962E-0D9005A44C8E

PAGE1

CHECK9

on off wordwrap

1. CONTRACT NUMBER

on off

Arial bold

QUARTERLY ASSESSMENT REPORT

Arial bold left on

MONTHLY or on off off

Arial off global

CHECK8

Attach continuation sheet(s) if necessary

Arial plain center on

2. MONTH

on off

Arial

Times New Roman plain off

CHECK8

FIELD6

plain off

FIELD5

CHECK1

3. OVERALL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

on off

Arial plain off

CHECK2

FIELD14

ACCEPTABLE

on off

Arial off

Helvetica plain

FIELD6

CHECK2

UNACCEPTABLE

on off

Arial off

Helvetica plain

CHECK1

FIELD9

TO: AFOTEC/A-7K

on off

Arial

Contractor:

on off

Arial plain off

FIELD9

CHECK3

5. Monthly Performance Assessment: (Utilize the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting (CPAR) definitions and notes provided below.)

on off

Arial

6. ASSESSMENT SUMMARY: (Describe any performance issues noted during the month/quarter, any corrective actions taken. Reference PWS para for each issue.)

on off

Arial

EXCEPTIONAL

on off

Arial

VERY GOOD

on off

Arial

SATISFACTORY

on off

Arial

MARGINAL

on off

Arial

UNSATISFACTORY

on off

Arial off

Helvetica plain

FIELD14

CHECK4

off

Helvetica plain

CHECK3

CHECK5

off

Helvetica plain

CHECK4

CHECK6

off

Helvetica plain

CHECK5

CHECK7

off

Helvetica plain

CHECK6

FIELD27

Exceptional. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

Note: To justify an Exceptional rating, you should identify multiple significant events in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular benefit could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

on off

Helvetica bold text/rtf {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fprq2\fcharset0 Arial;}} {\colortbl ;\red0\green15\blue0;} \viewkind4\uc1\pard\cf1\b\f0\fs14 Exceptional. \b0 Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.\par \tab\i Note: To justify an Exceptional rating, you should identify \ul multiple\ulnone significant events in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. \ul However, a singular benefit could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating\ulnone . Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.\par

Very Good. Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Note: To justify a Very Good rating, you should identify a significant event in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

on off

Helvetica bold text/rtf {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fprq2\fcharset0 Arial;}} {\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue0;} \viewkind4\uc1\pard\cf1\b\f0\fs14 Very Good. \b0 Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.\par \tab\i Note: To justify a Very Good rating, you should identify a significant event in each category and state how it was a benefit to the GOVERNMENT. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.\par

Satisfactory. Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Note: To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contracotr recovered from without impact to the contract. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DoD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Safisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

on off

Helvetica bold text/rtf {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fprq2\fcharset0 Arial;}} {\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green15\blue0;} \viewkind4\uc1\pard\cf1\b\f0\fs14 Satisfactory.\b0 Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.\cf2\par \tab\cf1\i Note: To justify a Satisfactory rating, there should have been only minor problems, or major problems the contracotr recovered from without impact to the contract. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DoD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Safisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.\par

Unsatisfactory. Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Note: To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, you should identify multiple events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular problem could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g. Management, Quality, Safety, or Environmental Deficiency Reports, or letters).

on off

Helvetica bold text/rtf {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss\fprq2\fcharset0 Arial;}} {\colortbl ;\red0\green15\blue0;} \viewkind4\uc1\pard\cf1\b\f0\fs14 Unsatisfactory. \b0 Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.\par \tab\i Note: To justify an Unsatisfactory rating, you should identify \ul multiple\ulnone events in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. However, a singular problem could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating. An unsatisfactory rating should be supported by referencing the management tools used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiencies (e.g. Management, Quality, Safety, or Environmental Deficiency Reports, or letters). \par plain off

CHECK7

BUTTON1

RELEASABILITY: Access to this form is restricted: this form is For Official Use Only (FOUO) when filled in; requests for accessibility must be approved by the OPR.

Arial bold

AFOTEC Form 5 on off

Arial off off pagedone #PAGE2.global

4. FROM: (NAME OF COR)

on off

Arial off global

CHECK8

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some serious problems, but recovery was still possible. Corrective actions taken by the contractor were marginally effetive or were not fully implemented.

Arial

Marginal.

Arial

NOTE: To justify marginal performance, you should identify a significant event in each category that the contractor had trouble overcoming and state how it impacted the GOVERNMENT. A marginal rating should be supported by referencing the managment tool used to notify the contractor of the contractual deficiency (e.g. Managment, Quality, Safety, or Environmental Deficiency Report or letter).

Arial italic

882EE41B-CD74-4ED8-8455-D850DC93273D

960;1260

PAGE2

off off pagedone #PAGE1.global

FIELD7

AFOTEC Form 5, 20080301 (reverse) (Test Form) on off

Arial bold text/rtf {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fprq2\fcharset0 Arial;}} {\colortbl ;\red0\green15\blue0;} \viewkind4\uc1\pard\cf1\b\f0\fs16 AFOTEC Form 5, 20080301 \i (reverse)\i0 (Test Form)\par

7. POTENTIAL PROBLEM AREAS: (List areas of concern including the surveillance process now used, items should be discussed at next progress meeting.)

on off

Arial plain off fixed on global

FIELD2

8. CHANGES: (Upcoming personnel changes, contractor or SOW changes, contract modification.)

on off

Arial

RELEASABILITY: Access to this form is restricted: this form is For Official Use Only (FOUO) when filled in; requests for accessibility must be approved by the OPR.

on off

Arial bold left plain off fixed off

FIELD8

Functional Commander/Director (FC/FD) on off

Arial bold plain off date

Enter date as 31 JAN 1999

Signature_Button plain off off

FIELD2

Signature_Button string

PRINT NAME & INDICATE TITLE

on off

Arial plain center

Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) on off

Arial bold

SIGNATURE

on off

Arial plain

DATE

on off

Arial bold plain off date

Enter date as 31 JAN 1999

Signature_Button plain off off

FIELD2

Signature_Button string