FA702219RA007_Q_A_Round_2.pdf
PDF 84 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Nuclear Data Evaluation Support (NDES) III Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA702219RA007
About this file
Questions and Answers Round 2
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA702219RA007
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Round 2 – 5 April 2019
No. Question Answer 1 The PWS (ATCH_1, section 5.4) states “The contractor shall house the 24ANN server data in an existing and certified TS Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) within a two (2) hour traveling distance to AFTAC (Approximately 120 miles).”
Question: Is an “existing certified TS SCIF within 2 hours of AFTAC” a requirement for an acceptable proposal or is the ability to establish a TS SCIF within 2 hours of AFTAC sufficient?
AFTAC requires the contractor to have access to an established accredited TS SCIF at time of contract award such that work can begin on day 1 of the contract award.
2 The PWS (ATCH_1, Appendix C) states “The Government will provide up to two (2) workstations at AFTAC for Contractor use with NIPR and secure network access and telephone service. The Government will also provide the following items.”
Question 1: Is the GFE listed in the table provided at the two (2) AFTAC workstations, or is it for contractor use at a contractor facility? If the latter, what classification are the provided workstations?
Question 2: What is the classification of the source code and at what classification level is the source code maintained / developed on?
Answer 1: Appendix C is equipment that would be provided for contractor use at the established accredited SCIF. Classification and accreditation of SCIF applies to the GFE.
Answer 2: The highest classification of source code is TS//SCI for maintenance and development.
3 The PWS (ATCH_1, Appendix B) states “The historical workload data provided is for informational use only and is based upon historical data. Contractors shall propose based on their own technical approach.”
Question: Besides helping with the CDRL preparation, what are the Administrative Assistant hours used or intended for?
Historical information was used to generate the workload estimates. These hours were used for preparation of meeting minute notes, invoicing, and status reports. The vendor may propose alternative methods.
4 The PWS (ATCH_1, section 2.2.3 and 2.3.4) states that “The contractor shall ensure that [DASSLE | WORKFLOW] is properly interfaced with modernization efforts which may include new tool applications.”
Question: Is the scope of the modernization efforts and its required interfaces available?
Not at this time.
5 STANDARD FORM 33 Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices/Cost askes for a qty of 60 months pricing; however, Attachment 8 Labor Hours spreadsheet has the equivalent of 66 months of Labor, it appears that Section B and attachment 8 to not have the same# of months and will result in different total proposed cost.
Answer 1: ATCH 8 has been revised removing FY2025 columns and now reflects 60 months.
Amendment 0002 will be posted to FBO.
Answer 2: Yes using the revised ATCH 8, 60 month pricing should be reflected in ATCH 9.
FA702219RA007
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Round 2 – 5 April 2019
Question 1: Is it the government's intent that offers adjust Attachment 8 to reflect 60 months of effort spread over appropriate Government fiscal years? Question 2: Additionally, is it the Government's intent that offers reflect the above 60 Month Price in Attachment 9 Total Proposal Price?
6 Section L - Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors (ICNTO) paragraph L.4.2.3 Evaluation Subfactors states that Volume II - Technical/Technical Risk Volume will provide a proposal to fulfill the requirements outlined in the Task Order 0001 PWS. The proposal shall include a staffing plan and technical proposal. Additionally, the ICNTO does not provide specific instructions for Volume V - Task Order 0001 (Technical). Is it the Government's intent that all of the evaluated content of the technical proposal for Task Order 0001 PWS appear in Vol II and Vol V? Additionally, Should offers use the same instruction for Vol Vas stated in Vol II of ICNTO?
Task Order 0001 should only be proposed once in Volume V using the same instructions as Volume II. Do not include Task Order 0001 in Volume II.
File details come from the government source that posted it.