Attach_5_PPQ.pdf
PDF 920 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Technical Sensors Radar Support (TSRS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA702217R0004
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attach_2_DD_254_cont.pdf | ||
| Attach_1_PWS.pdf | ||
| RFP_Draft.pdf | ||
| Exhibit_A_CDRLs_A001_to_A006.pdf | ||
| Attach_4_Instructions_to_Offerors.pdf | ||
| Attach_2_DD_254.pdf | ||
| Attach_3_-_Rates.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAJRE
When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information JAW FAR2.IOJ & 3.104
I. CONTRACT IDENTIFICA TJON
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Cage Code: _ _ ____ _ C. Contract Number:
D. Role (e.g., Prime, Subcontractor, Teaming Partner, Joint Venture Partner): ---------- E. Contract Type_( e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPlf, CPFF): ----------------- F. Clearance Requirement (e.g., Unclassified, NAC, Secret, Top Secret): ___________ _
G. Program Title: ------------------- ------------ H. Brief Program Description:
I. Period of Performance:
II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE
A. Respondent Name(s)/Agency:
B. Phone Number(s)/E-mail:
C. Position Title(s) (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO): - --------------- D. Other suggested points of contact:
ill. GENERAL COMMENTS: ------------------------- -
IV. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Please indicate your performance rating for the contractor's by circling or place an "X" over the appropriate code using the performance evaluation scale below. Ratings are defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE RA TING
E EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
S SATISFACTORY - The contractor's performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY - Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to rate the contractor's performance.
Respondents should explain their rating in the remarks section for any rating of Unsatisfactory or Not Applicable, and ratings that might contradict official Past Performance documentation (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment
Reports (CPARs)). If more space is needed, remarks may be continued on separate pages. Please identify Factor and Sub-factor and question number.
TECHNICAL FACTOR - Rate the Offeror' s performance for the following sub-facto rs:
A. P roduct/System Performance
l. Overall performance in planning and controlling the program.
E s M u N
2. Overall consistency and reliability of performance.
E s M u N
A I. Engineering Analysis
3. Research and obsolescence engineering.
E s M u N
4. Studies and analysis methodology.
E s M u N
5. Reports and Briefings quality.
E s M u N
A 2. Engineering Design/Support
6. Design, test, integration and demonstration of systems to meet specifications & sustainability of aging systems.
E S M U N
7. Design of systems to meet required reliability/maintainability specifications or goals.
E S M u N
8. Integration or implementation of new technology & services.
E s M u N
9. Performance on innovative or highly complex tasks.
E s M u N
I 0. Reconfiguration of Government-owned software & hardware.
E s M u N
A 3. Softwa re Development
11. Software q uali ty performance.
E s M u N
12. Configuration management, control identification, status accounting & base-lining of software.
E S M U N
REMARKS: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
B. Schedule
13. Completion of major technical milestones on schedule (e.g. PDR/CDR).
E s M u N
14. Adherence to logistics milestones.
E s M u N
15. Adherence to overall contract schedule goals.
E s M u N
16. Adherence to required deliveries of technical data, plans, software documentation, reports, and other CORL items.
E s M u N
17. Data submittals are IA W contractual specifications.
E s M u N
18. Timeliness of ECP submissions.
E s M u N
REMARKS:
C. Cost Performance
19. Adherence to estimated costs & contract cost goals.
E s M u N
20. Achievement on incentive type contract performance, cost, schedules, including award fees.
E S M U N
2 I . Accuracy of costs reports.
E s M U N
22. Timeliness of cost reports.
E s M U N
23. Quality & completeness of cost reports.
E s M U N
24. Ability to control costs.
E s M U N
REMARKS:
D. Product Assurance
25. Produces quality products that meet contractual specification for design & performance.
E S M u N
26. Configuration Contro l procedures are in place & used when reasonable.
E. Test a nd Evaluation
27. First article test & test reports are !AW contractual specifications.
E s M u N
28. Completion of Government quality acceptance & performance tests on schedule.
E S M u N
29. Performance in planning, conducting & reporting on tests and/or demonstrations.
E S M u N
F. Training
30. Courses consistently meet training objectives.
E s M u N
REMARKS:
G . Logistica l Support
3 1. Development of logistics plan to include travel, working with foreign nationals, and support in remote locations worldwide.
E s M u N
32. Identification of incomplete/late tasks (causes, impacts, & resolution).
E s M u N
33. Response to government directed changes.
E s M u N
34. Identification of pre-operational support provided during system testing.
E s M u N
35. Develops & implements a high quality maintenance program to include documentation (e.g. technical data & drawings) and training.
E s M u N
36. Performs timely & accurate trend analysis & incorporates results into engineering reports.
E S M u N
REMARKS:
H. Management
37. Government property control.
E s M u N
38. Safety.
E s M u N
39. Security to include COMSEC, physical & personnel.
E s M u N
40. Shipping & handling.
E s M u N
41. Compliance with contract terms & conditions.
E s M u N
42. Working relationships (both management & technical) with Government personnel & associate contractors.
E S M U N
43 . Organization structure adequate in span of supervision E s M u N
REMARKS:
I. Responsiveness
44. Responsiveness to technical contract changes.
E s M u N
45. Managing and resolving problems.
E s M u N
46. Ability to respond to short and no notice emergencies.
E s M u N
47. Management cooperation in negotiations and problem resolution.
E s M u N
REMARKS:
J. Personnel
48. Ability to recruit & retain quality, qualified personnel.
49. Sufficiently manned to meet contractual requirements.
K. Subcontract Management
50. Overall perfonnance in planning and controlling the program.
E s M u N
L. Operations
51. Operates technically complex equipment during critical timeliness.
E s M u N
52. Solid operational knowledge ofradar systems.
E s M u N
53. Solid working knowledge of communications, cryptographic, and support systems.
E S M u N
54. Solid operational knowledge of high powered phased array and dish radar systems.
E S M u N
55. Fundamental operations knowledge of navigation and weather systems, and supporting subsystems.
E S M U N
56. Specific knowledge of radar tracking operations.
E s M u N
57. Solid operational knowledge of mobile radar systems and subsystems.
E s M u N
M. Maintenance
58. Maintains technically complex equipment during operational mission requirements.
E S M u N
59. Solid maintenance knowledge ofradar systems.
60. Solid working knowledge of communications, cryptographic, and support systems.
61 . Solid maintenance knowledge of high powered phased array and dish radar systems.
E S M u N
62. Fundamental maintenance knowledge of navigation and weather systems, and supporting subsystems.
E S M U N
63. Specific maintenance knowledge ofradar tracking operations.
E s M u N
64. Solid maintenance knowledge of mobile radar systems and subsystems.
E s M u N
REMARKS:
N. Other
65. Number of award/incentive Fees denied.
E s M u N
State Reasons as Appropriate: ------------------------------
66. Number of incidences of suspended progress payments, cure notices, show cause notices, or other Government remedial actions (please specify).
Suspended Progress Payments:
Cure Notices:------------------- Show Cause Notices: ----------------- Other:
State Reasons as Appropriate: - -----------------------------
67. Please discuss any additional information that might be applicable to future contract awards to this contractor:
68. Please provide the following information regarding cost/price:
( l) Original Contract Cost or Price $ ________ _
(2) Value of Negotiated Contract Changes $ ________ _
(3) Actual/Projected Cost to Complete $ ________ _
(4) Baseline Estimate at Completion $ ________ _
(5) Total Negotiated Changes EAC $ _ ______ _
(6) Cost Under run/Over run(-) $ _______ _
0. GENERAL COMMENT {Choose proper response and explain your choice in the remarks)
I. Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I ----- --- award to him today given that I bad a choice.
•circle one of the following:
a) Definitely would, b) probably would, c) might or might not, d) probably not, e) definitely not
2. Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for convenience or default or are there any pending terminations? (Applicable only to Government Contracts) •circle one of the following:
a I) Yes or b I) No; and a2) Convenience, b2) Default, or c2) Pending Termination.
3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
•circle one of the following:
a) Yes orb) No
4. Do you know of another source that has knowledge of this contractor's performance?
• circle one of the following:
a) Yes [please provide Name/Company/Phone/E-mail below] orb) No
REMARKS:
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
Mailing Address:
AMIC Det 2 (OL-PAFB, FL) Attn: Joyce G. Hongell I 0989 S. Patrick Dr, Bldg 10989 Patrick AFB, FL 32925
E-mail (• Preferred Method):
joyce.hongell. l@us.af.mil and susan.nichols@us.af.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .