Attachment B Notional Contract Approaches (For Comment).pdf
PDF 107 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Agile Refactoring & Sustainment of Legacy Applications to Salesforce Public Sector Solutions (PSS)
- Solicitation number
- FA7014Agile-Refactoring-Sustainment
About this file
This document is an Attachment B outlining Notional Contract Approaches for potential comment, presenting three alternative pricing and contract models for an Agile-based project:
B1. Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) Per Iteration: Pricing is determined by completed and accepted iterations, with clear cadence and acceptance checks. B2. FFP Team-Capacity: A monthly pricing model based on Agile team size, with acceptance criteria tied to accepted stories and sprint-level quality gates, including flexible options for team surge and drawdown. B3. Hybrid Approach: Combines FFP team capacity with limited Time & Materials (T&M) for specific expert technical investigations, maintaining tight control mechanisms. The document appears to be exploring flexible contract structures that align payment with project delivery and performance metrics in an Agile development environment.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment B — Notional Contract Approaches (For Comment) B1. Firm‑Fixed‑Price (FFP) Per Iteration: price per completed, accepted iteration; clear cadence and acceptance checks.
B2. FFP Team‑Capacity: monthly price per Agile team by team size; acceptance based on accepted stories and sprint‑level quality gates; options for surge/drawdown.
B3. Hybrid: FFP capacity with limited T&M for discrete expert spikes with clear controls.
Attachment B — Notional Contract Approaches (For Comment)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .