Attachment_3_PPQ.pdf
PDF 190 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Business, Engineering & Technical Assistance (BETA) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA7014-15-R-5012
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA7014-15-R-5012-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| FA7014-15-R-5012.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment_4_DD_FORM_254.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1_Pricing_Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment_2_PPQ_Cover_Letter.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5_QASP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE BUSINESS ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL
ASSISTANCE (BETA)
WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 2.101 & 3.104
RESPONDENTS TO QUESTIONNAIRES SHOULD NOT SEND THE COMPLETED
QUESTIONNAIRE BACK TO THE OFFEROR. SEE INSTRUCTIONS AT THE
BOTTOM OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE.
SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
A. Contractor: ________________________________________________________________________
B. Contractor Cage Code: _________________________________
C. Contract number: ______________________________________
D. Contract type: ______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____
F. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________
G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________
H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________
I. Number of Hours and/or Full Time Equivalents (FTEs): _________________________________
J. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:
K. Description of service provided:
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer or agency name: __________________________________________________________
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable): __________________________________________
C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other
Commands:
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator's name: __________________________________________________________________
B. Evaluator's title: ___________________________________________________________________
C. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ________________________________________________________
D. Length of time (number of years/months) evaluator worked on subject contract: ________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
1. Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
CODE PERFORMANCE RATING
B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded many of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at a superior level.
Performance was accomplished with very few minor problems, and the contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions for those problems that did occur.
P PURPLE/VERY GOOD - During the entire period, the contractor met and exceeded some of the requirements of the contract and consistently performed very well.
Performance was accomplished with some minor problems, and the contractor took timely and effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.
G GREEN/SATISFACTORY - During the entire period, the contractor met the requirements of the contract and consistently performed at an acceptable level.
Performance was accomplished with some problems, and the contractor took effective corrective action for those problems that did occur.
Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – During the entire period, the contractor did not always meet some of the requirements of the contract and intervention was required to continue performance. There were instances where performance was at a less than acceptable level; performance was accomplished with some problems and some corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – During the entire period, the contractor did not meet the requirements of the contract and performance was at an unacceptable level. There were a number of serious problems that required extensive oversight and involvement, and corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent.
N/A NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, or information was not available. Do not know.
Technical Performance B P G Y R N/A
T1 How well did the contractor assist in the successful transformation/improvement of processes for logistics and supply chain management (to include life-cycle systems sustainment management) within a global-scale organization?
T2 How well did the contractor assist in the successful transformation/improvement of processes for human resource management within a global-scale organization?
T3 How well did the contractor assist in the successful transformation/improvement of processes for financial management within a global-scale organization?
T4 How well did the contractor assist in the successful development and implementation of strategic planning and performance measurement to achieve target strategic goals and outcomes?
T5 How well did the contractor assist in the successful application of
Continual Process Improvement and Business Process Reengineering methods?
T6 How well did the contractor assist in the successful achieving organizational streamlining and change management?
T7 How well did the contractor assist in the effective use of tools to support reengineering, business transformation implementation and schedule management?
Program Management B P G Y R N/A
P1 Was the contractor successful in planning and proposing realistic schedules, monitoring performance, completing work on time, and implementing corrections/changes in a timely manner?
P2 How timely and effectively did the contractor resolve contract problems without extensive customer guidance?
P3 How well did the contractor obtain in a timely manner qualified personnel required to support highly specialized projects, and maintain the required workforce throughout the project?
P4 How successfully did the contractor respond to emergency and/or surge situations?
Transition/phase-in B P G Y R N/A
T1 How smoothly did the contractor transition resources and personnel?
Cost Performance B P G Y R N/A
C1 How accurately did the contractor forecast contract costs?
C2 How successfully did the contractor alert the Government of unforeseen costs before they occurred?
2. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), Y/M
(Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).
3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?
Yes___ Default___ Convenience___ Pending Terminations___
No ___
If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).
SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY
Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?
Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.
Evaluator’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
E-mail to Mr. Craig McClain at craig.l.mcclain.ctr@mail.mil and cc Mrs. Karen Cimorelli at karen.s.cimorelli.civ@mail.mil. If additional assistance is needed to return the questionnaire, please contact Mr. Craig McClain at (240) 612-6263.
mailto:craig.l.mcclain.ctr@mail.mil mailto:karen.s.cimorelli.civ@mail.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .