Attachment_2 _Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
Grease Trap, Biosolid, Septic Tank Service Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA7000-16-T-0089
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Headquarters Air Force Academy

About this file

Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Grease Trap, Biosolid, Septic Tank Service, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment_3 _Wage_Determination.txt TXT text file
FA7000-16-T-0089_Solicitation.pdf PDF
Attachment_5 _Violations.docx DOCX document
Attachment_4 _Financial_Reference.doc DOC document
Attachment_1 _PWS_19_Apr_16.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA7000-16-T-0089

Past Performance Survey Attachment 4

FA7000-16-T-0089

Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

This attachment will not be incorporated into the resultant contract.

THIS DOCUMENT, WHEN COMPLETED, IS ONLY FOR VIEW BY THE GOVERNMENT.

This questionnaire is for the United States Air Force Academy Contracting Office.

Bio-solid, Grease Traps, Sand Traps, Oil Water Separators, Septic Tanks, Cesspools

Your contractor is being considered for a contract to perform non-hazardous waste collection and disposal services for the USAF Academy, Colorado. A primary consideration in our selection process is history of performance of similar efforts. Please send completed questionnaire directly to Thomas Rokita by 9 September 2016. Do not forward questionnaire to vendor.

TELEPHONE: 719-333-9629

FAX: 719-333-6608

E-MAIL: thomas.rokita@us.af.mil

MAIL:10th Contracting Squadron/LGCA
Attn: Thomas Rokita
8110 Industrial Drive, Suite 200
U.S.A.F. Academy, CO 80840

VENDOR: __________________________________________________________________

RESPONDENT:

Name: _____________________________________ Title: _______________________________________

Organization and Address: __________________________________________________________________

Telephone: ___________________ E-mail: ______________________________

CONTRACT WITH RESPONDENT:

Title: ___________________________________________________________________________________ Period of Performance: __________________________ Contract Number: __________________________ Dollar Amount: ___________________________________________________________________________ Services Performed: _______________________________________________________________________

PERFORMANCE:

Chose the description of the contractor’s work that best reflects their performance using the descriptions provided below. Please provide a narrative explanation for any rating of unsatisfactory, marginal, very good or exceptional and any other specific problems or annotations that would help us evaluate the contractor.

E
VG
S
M
U
N/A
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Not

Applicable

During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and consistently exceeding (or exceeded) many. Very few, if any minor problems encountered. Contractor took immediate and effective corrective actions.

During the contract, period contractor is meeting (or met) all contract requirements and exceeding (or exceeded) some. Some minor problems encountered. Contractor took timely corrective action.

During the contract period, contractor performance is meeting (or met) all contract requirements. For any problems encountered, contractor took effective corrective actions.
During the contract period, contractor performance is not meeting (or did not meet) some contract requirements. For problems encountered, corrective actions appeared only marginally effective, not effective, or not fully implemented. Customer involvement was required.

During the contract period, contractor performance is failing (or failed) to meet most contract requirements. Serious problems encountered. Corrective actions were either ineffective or non-existent. Extensive customer oversight and involvement was required.

Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect. Do not know.

PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FOR

EACH QUESTIONS.

QUALITY

1.
Rate the contractor’s overall performance in terms of quality of service:

COMMENTS:

E
VG
S
M
U
N
2.
Were there any quality issues? If yes, explain how the contractor resolved the issue(s).
E
VG
S
M
U
N
3.
Demonstrated an effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
E
VG
S
M
U
N

SCHEDULE

4.
Compliance with scheduled services.
E
VG
S
M
U
N
5.
Responsiveness to unscheduled services.
E
VG
S
M
U
N
6.
Accuracy and timeliness of invoices, reports and records.
E
VG
S
M
U
N

MANAGEMENT

7.
Did the contractor keep you informed of any problems as they occurred and suggest solutions to the problems?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
8.
Maintenance and cleanliness of waste receptacles.

COMMNETS:

E
VG
S
M
U
N
9.
Management and supervision.
E
VG
S
M
U
N

OVERALL

10.
Were there any negative performance aspects of the contractor?
E
VG
S
M
U
N
11.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure notice? If yes, explain.
Yes
No
12.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
Yes
No

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: _________________________________________________________________________________________

Thank you for completing the questionnaire.

The completed questionnaire is to ONLY be viewed by the Government. Do not submit a copy of the completed questionnaire to anyone other than Thomas Rokita, Contract Specialist, or Carol Mohr, Contracting Officer.

FAX or E-MAIL COMPLETED QUESTIONAAIRE FORM TO:

FAX: ATTN: Thomas Rokita, Contract Specialist, or Carol Mohr, Contractor Officer, 10 CONS/LGCA, FAX (719) 333-6608

E-MAIL: thomas.rokita@us.af.mil or carol.mohr@us.af.mil

****FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY, ONCE COMPLETED****

** FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY ONCE COMPLETED**

**FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY ONCE COMPLETED**

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .