PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.doc

DOC document 70 KB Posted

Attached to
Repair & Maintain Aircraft Parking Apron Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA6633-17-R0001
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Reserve Command

About this file

Atch 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Repair & Maintain Aircraft Parking Apron, newest first.
File Type Posted
QJKL_18-0016_-_Site_Visit_Questions.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Sign_In_Roster.pdf PDF
20170303_Wage_Determination_MN96.pdf PDF
Sample_Consent_Letter.docx DOCX document
Financial_Responsibility_Sheet.doc DOC document
SF_24_Bid_Bond_Form.pdf PDF
FA6633-17-R-0001_Repair_and_Maintain_AC_Parking_Apron.pdf PDF
Drawings.pdf PDF
Technical_Specifications.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA6633-17-R0001

May 2017

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The information obtained from this questionnaire will be used to evaluate past performance of offerors submitting a proposal in response to the Minneapolis-St Paul Air Reserve Station Solicitation # FA6633-17-R-0001 for Repair/Maintain Aircraft Parking Ramp, Project QJKL 18-0016.

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: (Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate):

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: _________________

Address: __________________________ Fax Number:_______________________

__________________________ Point of Contact____________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work:___________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ________________ Dollar Amount: _________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ____________________*

Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent:

_ ____________________ Title: __________________________

Organization _____________ ____________________________________________

Address: __ ______________________ Telephone Number: _______ ___________

Fax Number:____________ __ _________

Email Address: ____ __________________

FAX, EMAIL, or MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORMS TO:

*DO NOT SEND BACK TO THE CONTRACTOR*

934 CONF/LGC – Attn: Carolyn Lohman (Solicitation FA6633-17-R-0001) Fax: 612-713-1425 E-mail Carolyn.Lohman.1@us.af.mil (612) 713-1430 Mailing Address:

934 CONF/LGC

Attn: Ms Carolyn Lohman Solicitation FA6633-17-R-0001 760 Military Highway, Bldg 729 Minneapolis, MN 55450-2100

PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows: (B, P, G, Y, R and N).

PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF Y or R.

B
P
G
Y
R
N
Blue / Exceptional
Purple /

Very Good

Green / Satisfactory
Yellow / Marginal
Red / Unsatisfactory
Not

Applicable

The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective
The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective
The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problems(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective
Unable to provide a score

CONTRACTOR/SUBCONTRACTOR ’S NAME: ______________________________________________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Pages may be included if more space is needed for additional remarks.

When Filled in This Document is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
B
P
G
Y
R
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22.
How well did the contractor support subcontracting opportunities with small, small disadvantaged, women and veteran-owned businesses?
23.
Were warranty issues resolved timely and completely?
24.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES/NO
25.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES/NO
26.
Was the contractor rated in CPARS/CCASS as a result of this contract?
YES/NO
27.
Was the contract completed on time?
YES/NO

REMARKS:__________________________________________________________________________

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .