RFI 1 BEFORE AWARD - Government Answers.pdf

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REPORT (RFI)

RFI NO. PAGE NO.

CONTRACT NO. CONTRACT TITLE PRIME CONTRACTOR

Contractor's Request for Information

REQUESTED BY: DATE REQUESTED Potential Cost Impact

[No] Potential Schedule

Impact [No]SUBCONTRACTOR

RFI

SUBJECT:

DRAWINGS

INFORMATION REQUESTED:

ATTACHMENTS FROM CONTRACTOR: (1 attachment)

Question:

Response:

NOTE: THE RFI SYSTEM IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT MECHANISM FOR RESPONDING TO CONTRACTOR'S REQUESTS FOR

INFORMATION. IT DOES NOT PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WITH ADDITIONAL WORK. IF THE CONTRACTOR CONSIDERS

THE RFI RESPONSE A CHANGED CONDITION, PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE

IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT PROVISIONS.

QA REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE DATE

RFI FORM

FA660626R0005 Repair Roof, Hangar 3

RBT Roofing 14 April 2026

Are personnel requirements regarding SSHO, QCM, etc the same as the previous solicitation on this project where the government confirmed they can serve as dual hats?

Question:

Question:

Is an RRO (Registered Roof Observer) required to wear a separate hat and be present for the entire project duration?

Regarding past performance projects on mandatory submission requirement #2. It states to provide five projects that the applicator has constructed using the manufacturer's roofing products. Keynote C below that portion also states that the installer must supply (5) TPO or PVC projects completed within the previous three years that are of similar size & scope.

Our question is: does there need to be (10) separate projects listed for these requirements or can 5 projects cover both? Can they be some of the same projects for either requirement?

Also, must all projects we supply be from the TPO manufacturer we are proposing for this project? Please clarify.

Response:

Response:

1 BEFORE AWARD

If the General Contractor is also the authorized installer, only 5 projects are required and must use the proposed TPO manufacturer's product. If the General Contractor is NOT the authorized installer, they must provide an additional 5 projects of similar size and scope from any TPO manufacturer. Proposals must specify whether each submitted project is for the applicator, the general contractor, or the general contractor acting as the applicator. Furthermore, all submitted projects for the applicator should directly correlate with the business name of the approved applicator as it appears in the letter provided by the manufacturer.

The time on site will be based on the requirements of ASTM D7186-14. A Registered Roof Observer (RRO) is expected to function as an independent, third-party quality assurance observer and should not wear multiple hats. Their primary role is to act as an unbiased on-site monitor for the design team and owner, ensuring compliance with specifications and warranty.

Per the specs, the SSHO can also serve as the QCM or Superintendent. Anyone in the Superintendent role cannot serve as the QC. One individual should not be acting as all 3 roles.

REQUEST FOR INFORMATION REPORT (RFI)

RFI NO. PAGE NO.

CONTRACT NO. CONTRACT TITLE PRIME CONTRACTOR

Contractor's Request for Information

REQUESTED BY: DATE REQUESTED Potential Cost Impact

[No] Potential Schedule

Impact [No]SUBCONTRACTOR

RFI

SUBJECT:

DRAWINGS

INFORMATION REQUESTED:

ATTACHMENTS FROM CONTRACTOR: (1 attachment)

Question:

Response:

NOTE: THE RFI SYSTEM IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AN EFFICIENT MECHANISM FOR RESPONDING TO CONTRACTOR'S REQUESTS FOR

INFORMATION. IT DOES NOT PROVIDE AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WITH ADDITIONAL WORK. IF THE CONTRACTOR CONSIDERS

THE RFI RESPONSE A CHANGED CONDITION, PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE

IN ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACT PROVISIONS.

QA REVIEWER'S SIGNATURE DATE

RFI FORM

FA660626R0005 Repair Roof, Hangar 3

RBT Roofing 14 April 2026

This was asked on the previous solicitation for this project. “What is the existing slope of the structural concrete deck on the lower adjacent roofs, if there is any slope?” Government answered by stating to assume a ¼” per ft slope. Is this still the case?

Question:

Response:

1 BEFORE AWARD

Given the lower adjacent concrete deck roofs having an assumed 1/4" per ft slope. These new crickets must be 1/2" per ft crickets for positive drainage, not 1/4" per ft as mentioned in the project keynotes. Please clarify.

Existing concrete deck is believed to be sloped. The slope is assumed at 1/4" per foot.

Construction should follow the specs and drawings. Slopes provided are a minimum.