Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 90 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Paint IDIQ Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5685-11-R-0024
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 2- Bid Schedule Revised 18 Aug 11.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1- Project Specifications Revised 18 Aug 11.pdf | ||
| FA5685-11-R-0024-0002 Amendment 0003.pdf | ||
| FA5685-11-R-0024-0002 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| FA5685-11-R-0024 Paint IDIQ Q A.pdf | ||
| Q A Paint IDIQ.doc | DOC document | |
| FA5685-11-R-0024 Paint IDIQ.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2- Bid Schedule.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 4 - WAWF Instructions.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 6 -PPL_Jan_2011.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1- Project Specifications.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offeror’s Name:________________________________________
Solicitation: FA5685-11-R-0010
MEMORANDUM FOR WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
39th CONS/LGCA
Unit 7090 Box 127
APO AE 09824-0127
FROM:
Subject: Request for Performance Information, Solicitation # FA5685-11-R-0024 Title: Paint IDIQ
1. One of the integral considerations in proposal evaluations is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform on the proposed effort. This effort, solicitation number FA5685-11-R-0024 is to paint various facilities at Incirlik Air Base in Adana, Turkey. Due to the high consideration given to the offeror’s past performance, we request that you complete and return the attached questionnaire.
2. Our areas of interest are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. You are urged to submit your comments on similar programs for which your activity has contracts or administers contracts with the offeror. You may also provide any additional information that you think would benefit our office in our evaluation of the offeror’s proposal. Please note that we may contact the offeror to discuss problem areas or concerns you identify to see what corrective actions have been taken or will be taken to prevent similar situations in the future. However, the offeror was required to provide points of contact for each reference provided to the US Government, and the individual’s name completing the questionnaire will not be disclosed to the offeror.
3. Due to time constraints, it is important that the questionnaire be completed and returned by the date proposals are due to the following address:
39th CONS/LGCA
Attn: TSgt Terry Agena
Unit 7090 Box 127
APO AE 09824-0127
“Mark documents “SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY”
Completed questionnaires may also be faxed to (322) 316-1090 or DSN (314) 676-8075, or emailed to terry.agena@incirlik.af.mil and rebecca.hoyt@incirlik.af.mil.
4. If additional information is required, please contact, TSgt Terry Agena or SSgt Rebecca Hoyt at (322) 316-8083.
CLARISSA LOPEZ
Contracting Officer
Attachment:
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NUMBER: FA5685-11-R-0024
PAINT IDIQ
SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Offeror's Name:______________________________________________
B. Cage Code under which contract was performed:____________________
C. Contract number / Program Title:_________________________________
D. Contract type (ex: FFP, Cost, T&M):______________________________
E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No
F. Was it a design-build contract? Yes No
G. Period of Performance (number of days):___________________________
H. Performed duties as: Prime Contractor Sub-contractor
I. If performed as a Prime Contractor, was there Sub-contractors? Yes No
J. Initial (at time of award) contract value: $_______________
K. Current/final contract value: $_______________
L. Reasons for differences between initial contract value and final contract value:
M. Description of work provided:
N. To help determine program relevancy, please indicate below the work the contractor has or is performing under this contract by placing an “X” or check mark in the appropriate block:
A-E Design work
Civil (pavements, site utilities) and/or Structural work
Electrical and/or Communications work
Mechanical (plumbing, HVAC) work
Fire Protection work
Security (secure rooms for classified work) and/or Force Protection work
New Construction (including building additions)
Interior renovation
SECTION 2: CUSTOMER/AGENCY/COMPANY IDENTIFICATION
A. Customer/Agency/Company Name:______________________________________________
B. Address:
C. Telephone Number:_____________________________________
D. Fax Number:____________________________________
E. Email Addres:_______________________________________________________________
SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION
A. Evaluator’s Name:________________________________________________
B. Evaluator’s Title:_________________________________________________
C. Evaluator’s Phone Number:_________________________________________
D. Evaluator’s Signature:_____________________________________________
SECTION 4: EVALUATION
Evaluation Instructions: Please choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. A definition of each rating is provided below. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” or check mark in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements. |
Comments:
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
Comments:
| 3. |
| Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements. |
Comments:
| 4. |
| Home office participated in solving significant local problems. |
Comments:
| 5. |
| Followed approved quality control plan. |
Comments:
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
Comments:
| 7. |
| Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures. |
Comments:
| 8. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. |
Comments:
| 9. |
| Identified problems as they occurred. |
Comments:
| 10. |
| Suggested alternative approaches to problems. |
Comments:
| 11. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems. |
Comments:
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 12. |
| Developed realistic progress schedules. |
Comments:
| 13. |
| Met established project schedules. |
Comments:
| 14. |
| Provided timely resolution of warranty defects. |
Comments:
| 15. |
| Was responsive to contract changes. |
Comments:
| 16. |
| Provided adequate project supervision. |
Comments:
| 17. |
| Possessed adequate funding to complete the project without advanced payments? |
Comments:
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 18. |
| Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner. |
Comments:
| 19. |
| Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task. |
Comments:
| 20. |
| Cooperated with Government/Company personnel after award. |
Comments:
| 21. |
| How would you rate the contractor's overall performance? |
Comments:
| 22. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.” |
| YES |
NO
| 23. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain. |
| YES |
NO
Comments:
| 24. |
| Is the contractor rated in CPARS? |
| YES |
NO
Additional Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .