FA5682-12-R-0009 _Atch_4_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Security Guard Servcices Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5682-12-R-0009
About this file
Attachment 4 Past Performance Questiionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA5682-12-R-0009-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| SV Security Map Atch 2.pdf | ||
| FA5682-12-R-0009.doc | DOC document | |
| Sec Guards PWS Atch 1.doc | DOC document | |
| Attachment 3 FY13-FY17.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Sec Guards PWS.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 4
FA5682-12-R-0009
QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENT LETTER
FROM: 31 CONS/LGCB
Via Pordenone 89/B, Area “E” Edif.600
| Base Area di Aviano |
| Aviano (PN) 33081 |
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
1. The 31st Contracting Squadron is in the process of conducting a source selection for Security Guard Services requirements at the Solar Observatory at San Vito dei Normanni, Italy. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform. The Government depends on information received from those who have first hand information, in order to evaluate the offeror’s past performance.
2. Areas of interest in the offerors past performance are summarized in the electronic past performance questionnaire e-mailed to you by the offeror.
3. Although this questionnaire was distributed to you by the offeror/contractor, it is important you electronically complete the questionnaire and forward it directly to the Government Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO), not later than 21 May 2012, at the following e-mail address: ornella.bresil1@aviano.af.mil and thomas.brannen@aviano.af.mil.
4. DO NOT RETURN OR E-MAIL THE QUESTIONNAIRES BACK TO THE OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR! Once the questionnaire is filled out, it becomes source selection sensitive and needs to be handled accordingly. If you have any concern please contact Mr. Ornella Bresil at +39 (0)434-307961.
5. Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.
Sincerely, ORNELLA BRESIL Procuring Contracting Officer
Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
| __________________________ |
| __________________________ |
Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
| Address: _____________________ | Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ | Fax Number: | _____________________ |
| _____________________________ | Email Address: _____________________ |
C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: ornella.bresil1@aviano.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (A, U and UNK) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF U.
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Acceptable (A) |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown |
| Unacceptable (U) |
| Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort. |
| Unknown (UNK) |
| In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so spars that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. |
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
* Please explain the circumstances of any “unsatisfactory” rating in the corresponding “Remarks” area of each item.
| A |
| U * |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Rate how well the contractor transitioned into assuming full performance responsibility from the incumbent contractor. |
Remarks:
| 2. |
| Rate how well the contractor provided adequate, competent and qualified personnel capable of meeting contract requirements throughout the performance period of the contract. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 3. |
| Rate how well the contractor’s top management was involved and committed to program success during the transition period and throughout the period of the contract. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 4. |
| Rate how effective the contractor’s management of subcontracts was/is. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 5. |
| Rate how timely and sufficient the contractor’s resources (manning levels, etc.) were/are to meet contract requirements (technical, management, and contractual). |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 6. |
| Rate how well the contractor respond(s/ed) to and act(s/ed) on customer feedback. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 7. |
| Rate how well the contractor perform(s/ed) the terms of the contract within the contractually agreed price. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 8. |
| Rate how well the contractor demonstrate(s/d) a reasonable and cooperative business relationship with the Government’s Program Management and Contract Management teams. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 9. |
| Rate the effectiveness of the contractor’s security program (Please annotate the number of reportable security incidents, if applicable). |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 10. |
| Rate the effectiveness of the contractor’s safety program to ensure compliance with federal, state and local regulations. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 11. |
| Rate how timely and effective the contractor’s responses to and resolution of problems were/are. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 12. |
| Rate how flexible, cooperative, and reasonable the contractor was/is in meeting mission requirements, particularly during short-notice mission changes. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 13. |
| Rate how innovative the contractor was/is in performing and resolving problems. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 14. |
| Rate how well the contractor monitor(s/ed) and maintain(s/ed) records of the performance of the security guards. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 15. |
| Rate how responsive the contractor’s quality program was/is in identifying, correcting, and preventing initial and recurring contract discrepancies. |
Remarks:
| A |
| U |
| UNK |
| N/A |
| 16. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “Remarks.” |
Remarks:
| YES |
| NO |
| 17. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “Remarks” below. |
| YES |
| NO |
Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .