Atch 5, PPQ.doc
DOC document 47 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Maintenance & Repair of Hoists
- Solicitation number
- FA561320R0003
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch 6, EMS Flyer.pdf | ||
| Atch 4, PMP.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch 3, Clauses and Provisions.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA5613-20-R-0003, Combined Synopsis-Solicitation.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch 1, Pricing Schedule.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch 2, PWS Hoists 27 Jan 20.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 5
FA5613-20-R-0003
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) This acquisition is for Preventive Maintenance, Safety Inspections and Repair of Hoists in the Kaiserslautern Military Community.
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address:
Telephone Number: ____________________
Email Address:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*:
Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B.
RATER INFORMATION:
Name of Rater:
Title:
Address:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 4 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:
Jutta Keller/Contracting Specialist Andrew Peterson /Contracting Officer
700 CONS/PKA
and
700 CONS/PKA
jutta.keller..de@us.af.mil andrew.peterson.4.@us.af.mil
+49-631-536-8444, DSN 489-8444
+49-631-536- 6598 or DSN 489-6598
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (A or U) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF Unacceptable (U).
| A |
| U |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element may have contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| Acceptable |
| Unacceptable |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements and adequate project supervision at the place of performance. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and/or replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Provided adequately trained personnel. |
| 4. |
| Interfaced and cooperated with government quality assurance personnel (or corporate/agency equivalent) after being awarded the contract and/or commencement of project performance. |
| 5. |
| Maintained sanitary conditions within the work environment. |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 7. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies pursuant to their quality control procedures and established procedures to prevent recurrence of discrepancy. |
| 8. |
| Identified problems as they occurred and/or suggested alternative approaches to problem resolutions. |
| 9. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems and follow-up to ensure desired results were achieved. |
| 10. |
| Provided timely and courteous service to guests. |
| 11. |
| Was responsive to contract changes (if applicable). |
| 12. |
| Provided adequate supervision and manpower to meet established schedules. |
| 13. |
| Contractor adequately coped with any sudden surge in requirements (if applicable). |
| 14. |
| Contractor adequately coped with short notice requirements. |
| 15. |
| How would you rate the vendor's overall performance? |
REMARKS/COMMENTS:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .