Atch 5, PPQ.doc

DOC document 47 KB Posted

Attached to
Maintenance & Repair of Hoists
Solicitation number
FA561320R0003
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Atch 6, EMS Flyer.pdf PDF
Atch 4, PMP.doc DOC document
Atch 3, Clauses and Provisions.docx DOCX document
FA5613-20-R-0003, Combined Synopsis-Solicitation.doc DOC document
Atch 1, Pricing Schedule.doc DOC document
Atch 2, PWS Hoists 27 Jan 20.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 5

FA5613-20-R-0003

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) This acquisition is for Preventive Maintenance, Safety Inspections and Repair of Hoists in the Kaiserslautern Military Community.

A.

GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address:

Telephone Number: ____________________

Email Address:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:

Contract Number*:

Contract Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:

Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B.

RATER INFORMATION:

Name of Rater:

Title:

Address:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 4 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:

Jutta Keller/Contracting Specialist Andrew Peterson /Contracting Officer

700 CONS/PKA

and

700 CONS/PKA

jutta.keller..de@us.af.mil andrew.peterson.4.@us.af.mil

+49-631-536-8444, DSN 489-8444

+49-631-536- 6598 or DSN 489-6598

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (A or U) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF Unacceptable (U).

A
U
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element may have contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements and adequate project supervision at the place of performance.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and/or replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Provided adequately trained personnel.
4.
Interfaced and cooperated with government quality assurance personnel (or corporate/agency equivalent) after being awarded the contract and/or commencement of project performance.
5.
Maintained sanitary conditions within the work environment.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies pursuant to their quality control procedures and established procedures to prevent recurrence of discrepancy.
8.
Identified problems as they occurred and/or suggested alternative approaches to problem resolutions.
9.
Displayed initiative to solve problems and follow-up to ensure desired results were achieved.
10.
Provided timely and courteous service to guests.
11.
Was responsive to contract changes (if applicable).
12.
Provided adequate supervision and manpower to meet established schedules.
13.
Contractor adequately coped with any sudden surge in requirements (if applicable).
14.
Contractor adequately coped with short notice requirements.
15.
How would you rate the vendor's overall performance?

REMARKS/COMMENTS:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .