Atch_4 _PPQ_DRHA_160615.doc
DOC document 58 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA5613-15-R-0016
About this file
Atch 4 PPQ DRHA 160615
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Atch_2 _DRHA_PWS_29Jun15_FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_1 _Pricing_Schedule_DRHA_300615.docx | DOCX document | |
| Comb_Synop-Sol_15-R-0016_30_Jun_2015.doc | DOC document | |
| Atch_6 _Fax-Back_1MAY2015_PAGE_1.docx | DOCX document | |
| Atch_3 _Clauses Prov_30_Jun_2015.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment 5, Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)
FA5613-15-R-0016
Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) This acquisition is for Deployment Related Health Assessment (DRHA) Program Services of comprehensive health evaluations/assessments conducted pre- and post-deployment for active duty members assigned to Ramstein Air Base and Geographically Separated Units (GSU) in Germany.
A.
GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address:
Telephone Number: ____________________
Email Address:
Point of Contact:
Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number*:
Contract Amount:
Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:
Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.
To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B.
RATER INFORMATION:
Name of Rater:
Title:
Address:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:
Markus Wendel/Contract Specialist Inge Jenkins/Contracting Officer
700 CONS/LGCA
and
700 CONS/LGCA
markus.wendel.1.de@us.af.mil ingeborg.jenkins.1.de@us.af.mil
+49-631-536-6304 or DSN 489-6304 +49-631-536- 6800 or DSN 489-6800
CONTRACTOR’S NAME:
CONTRACT NUMBER:
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
| The contractor: |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements and adequate project supervision at the place of performance. |
| 2. |
| Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and/or replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period. |
| 3. |
| Provided adequately trained personnel. |
| 4. |
| Interfaced and cooperated with government quality assurance personnel (or corporate/agency equivalent) after being awarded the contract and/or commencement of project performance. |
| 5. |
| Maintained sanitary conditions within the work environment. |
| 6. |
| Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements. |
| 7. |
| Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies pursuant to their quality control procedures and established procedures to prevent recurrence of discrepancy. |
| 8. |
| Identified problems as they occurred and/or suggested alternative approaches to problem resolutions. |
| 9. |
| Displayed initiative to solve problems and follow-up to ensure desired results were achieved. |
| 10. |
| Provided timely and courteous service to guests. |
| 11. |
| Was responsive to contract changes (if applicable). |
| 12. |
| Provided adequate supervision and manpower to meet established schedules. |
| 13. |
| Contractor adequately coped with any sudden surge in requirements (if applicable). |
| 14. |
| Contractor adequately coped with short notice requirements. |
| 15. |
| How would you rate the vendor's overall performance? |
REMARKS/COMMENTS:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .