About this file

Attachment 5 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Pre-Proposal_Conference_Minutes_AOD.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal_Attendance_Sheet_AOD.pdf PDF
AOD_Pre-Proposal_Slides_12_Jun_13.ppt PPT presentation
Atch_2 _PWS _etc..doc DOC document
Atch_6 _Performance_Management_Plan.doc DOC document
Atch_4 _Applicable_Clauses_and_Provisions.doc DOC document
Atch_7 _EMS_Flyer.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Cover_Letter.pdf PDF
Atch_3 _Historical_Workload_Data_For_Repair_Calls.doc DOC document
Combined_Synopsis-Solicitation.doc DOC document
Atch_1 _Pricing_Schedule.doc DOC document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 5

FA5613-13-R-0022

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

This acquisition is for Preventive Maintenance, Safety Inspections and Repairs of Automatic Opening Doors in the Kaiserslautern Military Community (KMC).

A.

GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact:

Project Title or Brief Description of Work*:

Contract Number*:

Contract Amount:

Contract Period or Dates of Performance*:

Contractor performed as the ( Prime Contractor ( Sub-Contractor ( Key Personnel.

To be completed by the respondent and returned directly to the contracting office.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 5 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B.

RATER INFORMATION:

Name of Rater:

Name of Rater:

Title:

Title:

Address:

OR

Address:

Phone Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Email Address:

C. RETURN COMPLETED SURVEY FORM WITHIN 4 WORKING DAYS AFTER RECEIPT TO:

Erika Voss-Elsaesser/Contract Specialist Inge Jenkins/Contracting Officer

700 CONS/LGCE

and

700 CONS/LGCE

erika.voss_elsaesser.1.de@us..af.mil ingeborg.jenkins.1.de@us.af.mil +49-631-536-6809 or DSN 489-6809 +49-631-536- 6800 or DSN 489-6800

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to your organization’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Did contractor assign personnel with required skills to accomplish the work?
5.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
6.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
7.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
8.
Identified problems as they occurred.
9.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
10.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
11.
Provided timely resolution of defects.
12.
Was responsive to contract changes.
13.
Provided adequate project supervision.
14.
Complied with environmental requirements.
15.
Did contractor consistently respond within the required time frames?
16.
For US Government contracts only: Followed Government accepted Quality Control Plan.
17.
For US Government contracts only: Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
18.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
19.
How many power driven doors and/or gates are/were serviced under this contract?
Qty:
20
For US Government contracts only Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES / NO
21.
For US Government contracts only: Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES / NO
22.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES / NO

Remarks:

For Official Use Only

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .