FA5613-12-R-0006 Atch 3 PPQ Cover Ltr.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Educational & Developmental Intervention Services (EDIS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA5613-12-R-0006
About this file
RFP Atch 3
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation_QA_(2).docx | DOCX document | |
| Solicitation_Q A.docx | DOCX document | |
| USAFE_EDIS_PWS_2013_03_05_Atch_1 _Amend_4.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA5613-12-R-0006 _Atch_4_Subctr__Consent_Form_Amnd_4.docx | DOCX document | |
| SF30_EDIS_Amend_0004(1).pdf | ||
| FA5613-12-R-0006 _Atch_3_PPQ__Cover_Ltr_Amnd_4.docx | DOCX document | |
| EDIS_RFP_Conformed_through_Amend_0004.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA5613-12-R-0006 _Atch_2_Pricing_Schedule_Amnd_4(2).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FA5613-12-R-0006_Amend_0003.pdf | ||
| USAFE_EDIS_PWS_2012_04_17.pdf | ||
| FA5613-12-R-0006-0002 _Amendment_2.pdf | ||
| EDIS_RFP_Conformed_through_Amend_0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| FA5613-12-R-0006 RFP.pdf | ||
| FA5613-12-R-0006 Atch 2 Pricing Schedule.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| FA5613-12-R-0006-0001 Amendment 1.pdf | ||
| FA5613-12-R-0006 Atch 1 PWS.pdf | ||
| FA5613-12-R-0006 Atch 4 Subctr Consent Form.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 3
FA5613-12-R-0006
QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONDENT LETTER
FROM: 700 CONS/LGCD
Unit 3115
APO AE 09021-3115
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
1. The 700th Contracting Squadron is in the process of conducting a source selection for USAFE Educational & Development Intervention Services (EDIS) requirements. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s past performance on contracts which reflect the offeror’s ability to perform. The Government depends on information received from those who have first hand information, in order to evaluate the offeror’s past performance.
2. Areas of interest in the offerors past performance are summarized in the electronic past performance questionnaire e-mailed to you by the offeror.
3. Although this questionnaire was distributed to you by the offeror/contractor, it is important you electronically complete the questionnaire and forward it directly to the Government Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) not later than 2 Mar 2012 at the following e-mail address: harald.petry@ramstein.af.mil, stefan.scherer@ramstein.af.mil, and andrea.pitt@ramstein.af.mil. If you are unable to electronically submit the questionnaire to the e-mail address above, faxed copies will be accepted and can be sent to the attention of EDIS PCO, Mr. Harald E. Petry, FAX: +49 (0) 631-536-8410.
4. DO NOT RETURN OR E-MAIL THE QUESTIONNAIRES BACK TO THE OFFEROR OR CONTRACTOR! Once the questionnaire is filled out, it becomes source selection sensitive and needs to be handled accordingly. If you have any concern please contact Mr. Harald E. Petry at +49 (0)631-536-7026.
5. Your help is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this source selection.
Sincerely, HARALD E. PETRY Procuring Contracting Officer
Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________
| __________________________ |
| __________________________ |
Project Title and Brief Description of Work*: ________________________________________
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________
| Address: _____________________ | Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________ | Fax Number: | _____________________ |
| _____________________________ | Email Address: _____________________ |
C. FAX OR E-MAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: Mr. Harald E. Petry, FAX: +49 (0) 631-536-8410 and/or harald.petry@ramstein.af.mil, stefan.scherer@ramstein.af.mil, and andrea.pitt@ramstein.af.mil.
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. Please include copies of contract documentation such as Corrective Action Reports (CAR’s), Letters of Concern, and/or CPARS reports for Marginal and Unsatisfactory ratings.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Not Applicable |
Performance meets/met contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Performance meets/met contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory. |
| Performance does not meet/did not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Performance does not meet/did not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
* Please explain the circumstances of any “unsatisfactory” rating in the corresponding “Remarks” area of each item.
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N |
| 1. |
| Rate how well the contractor transitioned into assuming full performance responsibility from the incumbent contractor. |
Remarks:
| 2. |
| Rate how well the contractor recruited and provided qualified management and key personnel during the transition period and throughout the contract performance period. |
| 3. |
| Rate how well the contractor provided timely replacement of its personnel throughout the performance period of the contract. |
| 4. |
| Rate how effective the contactor was in meeting Cost/Price performance targets (i.e. changes, claims, request for proposals, etc.). |
| 5. |
| Rate how effective the contractor’s management of subcontracts was/is. |
| 6. |
| Rate how timely and sufficient the contractor’s resources (manning levels, skill mix etc.) were/are to meet contract requirements (technical, management, and contractual). |
| 7. |
| Rate how well the contractor respond(s/ed) to and act(s/ed) on customer feedback. |
| 8. |
| Rate how well the contractor perform(s/ed) the terms of the contract within the contractually agreed price. |
| 9. |
| Rate how well the contractor demonstrate(s/d) a reasonable and cooperative business relationship with the Government’s Program Management and Contract Management teams. |
| 10. |
| Rate the effectiveness of the contractor’s ability to provide adequate support required to its Health Care Professional(s) to ensure that they remained current with all licensing and training requirements while working and residing in an overseas environment? |
| 11. |
| Rate the effectiveness of the contractor’s security program (Please annotate the number of reportable security incidents, if applicable). |
| 12. |
| Please give an overall rating of the contractor for this contract. |
| 13. |
| Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “Remarks.” |
Remarks:
| YES |
| NO |
| 14. |
| Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “Remarks” below. |
| YES |
| NO |
Remarks:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .