Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
RAF Fairford Bird Control Service Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA5570-11-T-0023
Issued by
Department of the Air Force United States Air Forces in Europe - Air Forces Africa

About this file

Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to RAF Fairford Bird Control Service, newest first.
File Type Posted
Bird control PWS.doc DOC document
FA5570-11-T-0023.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 2 Past and Present Performance Questionnaire FA5570-11-T-0023, 22 September 2011

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Vendor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

(The government enters the following information based on list of references provided by the vendor.)

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: ___________________________________

Contract Name/Number: ___________________ $/£ Amount: ________________

Contract Period or Project Period of Performance: __________________________ Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ___________________________ Company/Organization:____________________________________________________

Address: ________________________Telephone Number: _______________________ _______________________________Fax Number:____________________________
_______________________________Email Address: __________________________

C. EMAIL COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO: andrew.pillow@alconbury.af.mil & 501csw.rco@alconbury.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (A or U) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF Unacceptable (U).

A
U
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element may have contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
Acceptable
Unacceptable
Not Applicable
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements and adequate project supervision at the place of performance.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and/or replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Demonstrated ability to provide adequate manning and equipment to respond to surge requirements, contingencies, emergencies and weather delays.
4.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
5.
Interfaced and cooperated with government quality assurance personnel (or corporate/agency equivalent) after being awarded the contract and/or commencement of project performance.
6.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
7.
Performed services on time.
8.
Displayed initiative to solve problems and follow-up to ensure desired results were achieved.
9.
Was responsive to contract changes (if applicable).
10.
Business relations (partnering meetings, etc)
11.
Effectively responded to customer complaints in a timely manner.
12.
Were offeror’s staff trained on the specific contract requirements?
13.
Provide adequate number of personnel to carry out the requirements of the contract/project? Allowing for leave of absence, etc.)
14.
Did offeror’s quality control process include accountability of operative’s performance?
15.
Displayed environmental awareness. (Compliance and initiatives)
16.
How would you rate the vendor's overall performance?

REMARKS/COMMENTS:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .