FA524024Q3006 Attachment 5 - Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 144 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 36 CES/CEN PMO Building 27003 Asbestos/Hazmat Testing Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA524024Q3006
About this file
This document is Attachment 5 - Evaluation Criteria for the federal contract opportunity FA524024Q3006 for Asbestos Survey and Hazmat Testing services at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam.
The evaluation criteria specify that the government will award a contract to the responsible offeror whose conforming offer is most advantageous, considering price and other factors. The key evaluation factors are: 1) Capability to meet the Statement of Work requirements (pass/fail), 2) Recent and relevant past performance (pass/fail), and 3) Price (ranked by price reasonableness). The government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis. The period of performance is not to exceed 45 days after the contract date. This is a 100% small business set-aside under NAICS code 541380 - Testing Laboratories and Services.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA524024Q3006 Amendment 0001 Q A.pdf | ||
| FA524024Q3006 Attachment 1 - Statement of Work (SOW).pdf | ||
| FA524024Q3006 Attachment 7 - Past Performance Fact Sheet.pdf | ||
| FA524024Q3006 Attachment 2 - Mandatory Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FA524024Q3006 Attachment 6 - Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| FA524024Q3006 Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| FA524024Q3006 Combined Synopsis Solicitation.pdf | ||
| FA524024Q3006 Attachment 3 - Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| FA524024Q3006 Attachment 4 - Instructions to Offerors.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA524024Q3006 36 CES/CEN PMO Building 27003 Asbestos/Hazmat Testing Attachment 5 - Evaluation Criteria
52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (as addended).
Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers as acceptable or unacceptable (pass or fail):
(i) Capability of the item/service offered to meet the requirement(s) of the SOW;
a. Acceptable is defined as offer/proposal meets requirements of the solicitation.
b. Unacceptable is defined as offer/proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation.
(ii) Past performance: the government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on information provided by the offeror; any past performance information obtained from survey/questionnaires (Attachment 8); and any data independently obtained by the government. Offerors are responsible for submitting past performance information as part of its offer/proposal—failure to do so may result in an unacceptable rating.
a. Acceptable is defined as: based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
b. Unacceptable is defined as: based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
c. Recent past performance information is defined as contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last three (3) years prior to the issuance date of the solicitation.
d. Relevant is defined as present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.
(ii) Price:كthe government will rank the Acceptable offerors by price. The evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the proposed price. In addition, each offeror’s separately priced line items or subline items shall be analyzed to determine if the prices are unbalanced. The government reserves the right to perform price realism analysis. In the event that the Government elects to perform price realism analysis, the Government reserves discretion over the methodology used. If the Government elects to perform a price realism analysis and finds a proposal unrealistic, the Government may withhold award to that offeror.
(b) Options. Omitted.
FA524024Q3006 36 CES/CEN PMO Building 27003 Asbestos/Hazmat Testing Attachment 5 - Evaluation Criteria
(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.
(End of provision)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .