Attachment 2, Industry Questionnaire FINAL.docx

FA2517-19-R-5000

Attachment 1

Attachment 2, Industry Questionnaire

FA521520R0001

INDUSTRY QUESTIONNAIRE

Interested parties should attempt to answer the following questions while reviewing Attachment 1, Performance Work Statement (PWS). Your company responses are limited to a maximum of 5 single-sided pages with text no less than 10-point font (Arial or Times New Roman) and a minimum of one-inch margins in Microsoft® Word, Adobe® PDF or compatible format. Do not include photos or references as part of the package.

Company Name:

Address:

U.S. Company Yes___ No___ Size under NAICS code 236220: 8(a) __ HUBZone___ SDVOSB___ WOSB___ Small___ CAGE Code:

DUNS Number:

POC Name and Title:

POC Phone and e-mail:

1. Provide a brief company history highlighting past relevant experience providing minor construction projects, to include associated logistic efforts, subcontracting plans, and foreseen difficulties associated with this effort.

2. Does your company have the capability/experience of performing multi-trade (e.g. electrical, painting, roofing, flooring, HVAC, paving/concrete, sewer/waterline, civil, mechanical, structural, etc.) projects?

3. Does your company have the capability/experience of mobilizing/demobilizing e.g. ramp-up/draw down workforce, material deliveries and logistics, commuting, and equipment?

4. Does your company have the capability/experience of using RSMeans software?

5. Is there a better commercial pricing tool (RSMeans) that could be utilized in this effort?

6. What experience does your company have with tasks involved in the administration and management of Government construction projects e.g. progress schedules, payroll submission, labor compliance checks, pre/post construction conference, government inspections, final contract completion, etc.?

7. How will your company manage projects in geographically separated installations?

8. How do you plan to coordinate administrative tasks with off-site personnel to maintain project schedule?

9. How will your company maintain an adequate Quality Assurance Program aimed to self-correct deficiencies?

10. Does your company believe that a single or multiple awards will satisfy this effort – Why?

11. Is there a disadvantage presented to a small business to compete successfully in this IDIQ effort?

12. Will your company be able to secure full bonding and insurance capacity?

13. The Government is contemplating using a Technical Acceptability w/ Performance Tradeoff for evaluation. What is your opinion on the proposed source selection approach and what would you suggest be an evaluation criteria/discriminator that can help differentiate the best companies?

14. Within the last three years, how many projects has your company successfully completed for:

Projects less than $250,000.00

Projects more than $250,000.00

15. From your perspective, is there any risk (technical, schedule, and cost) associated with this effort that have not been captured? If so, what is it and how would you mitigate?

16. From your perspective, is there a way the Government can incentivize contractor’s quality, and schedule?

17. From your perspective, is there any other approach that can streamline the acquisition process and ensure competition is sustained throughout the duration of the contract?

18. Can you share any innovate alternative methods/processes to reduce cost and/or improve the acquisition?

19. The PWS final version will be provided with the solicitation packet, as the draft PWS will change several times along the acquisition process. Is there anything in the PWS that needs Government attention? If so, what is it and what paragraph