5._Draft_PP_Ref_List_FA520920R0001.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
BASE-WIDE CUSTODIAL SERVICES AT YOKOTA AIR BASE and GEOGRAPHICALLY SEPARATED UNITS (TAMA, TOKOROZAWA, OWADA AND MOMOTE), JAPAN
Solicitation number
FA520920R0001
Issued by

About this file

From the source

5. Draft PP Ref List FA520920R0001

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
1._Draft_PWS__FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
8._Draft_Exhibit_-_Price_Schedule_for_FA520920R0001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
3._Appendix_C_-_Estimated_Square_Footage_and_Cleaning_Level.pdf PDF
4._Appendix_D__Required_Reports_and_Form.pdf PDF
6._Draft_PPQ_FA520920R0001.doc DOC document
Draft_Solicitation_-_FA520920R0001.pdf PDF
7._Govt_Policy_Ltr.pdf PDF
2._Appendix_A_-_AFCOLS_Custodial_Standards.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Attachment 5 Solicitation No. FA520920R0001

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE LIST

Name of Offeror:

The following Three (3) contracts are the most relevant contracts (similar in scope, size and complexity) performed for US Government agencies, Government of Japan, and Commercial customers performed within the last 5 years of the solicitation release date, or is currently in progress (see Solicitation Provision 52.212-1):

Contract No. 1

(1)Company/Division name
(2)Product/Service
(3)Contracting Agency/Customer
(4)Contract Number
(5)Contract Dollar Value
(6)Period of Performance
(7)Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8)Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9)Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10)Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.

Contract No. 2

(1)Company/Division name
(2)Product/Service
(3)Contracting Agency/Customer
(4)Contract Number
(5)Contract Dollar Value
(6)Period of Performance
(7)Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8)Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9)Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10)Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.

Contract No. 3

(1)Company/Division name
(2)Product/Service
(3)Contracting Agency/Customer
(4)Contract Number
(5)Contract Dollar Value
(6)Period of Performance
(7)Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer (Point-of-Contact)
(8)Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions
(9)Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.
(10)Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects (scope, magnitude of effort, and complexity) of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort.

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

File details come from the government source that posted it.