FA5209-15-T-0054-0002.pdf

F4GTY10043A002

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

1. Update and change the period of performance start and f inish dates for contract line items 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 1001, 1002, 2001, and 2002.

2. Update the period of performance of contract line item 2001 from 5 Months to 12 Months.

3. Update Federal Acquisition Regulation clauses 52.212-1 Addendum and 52.212-2.

4. Extend solicitation due date by 4 days from 25 June 2015 to 29 June 2015.

5. See summary of changes.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 11

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 24-Jun-2015

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA5209-15-T-0054

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

26-May-2015

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

24-Jun-2015

CODE

374TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON

UNIT 5228, BLDG 620, YOKOTA AB

FUSSA-SHI, TOKYO 197-0001 JAPAN

FA5209 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA5209-15-T-0054

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 2001

The pricing detail quantity has increased by 7.00 from 5.00 to 12.00.

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

POP 01-JUL-2015 TO

31-JUL-2016

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

FOB: Destination

W5872Z

To:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS UIC

POP 01-SEP-2015 TO

31-AUG-2016

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0002 has been changed from:

POP 06-JUL-2015 TO

05-JUL-2016

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

POP 01-SEP-2015 TO

31-AUG-2016

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0003 has been changed from:

POP 06-JUL-2015 TO

05-JUL-2016

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

POP 01-SEP-2015 TO

31-AUG-2016

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0004 has been changed from:

POP 06-JUL-2015 TO

05-JUL-2016

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

POP 01-SEP-2015 TO

31-AUG-2016

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1001 has been changed from:

POP 06-JUL-2016 TO

05-JUL-2017

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

POP 01-SEP-2016 TO

31-AUG-2017

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 1002 has been changed from:

POP 06-JUL-2016 TO

05-JUL-2017

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

POP 01-SEP-2016 TO

31-AUG-2017

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2001 has been changed from:

POP 06-JUL-2017 TO

05-JUL-2018

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

POP 01-SEP-2017 TO

31-AUG-2018

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 2002 has been changed from:

POP 06-JUL-2017 TO

05-JUL-2018

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

POP 01-SEP-2017 TO

31-AUG-2018

N/A KYOGAMISAKI COMMUNICATION SITE

TANGO-CHO, KYOTANGO-SHI

KYOTO 627-0245 JAPAN

The following have been modified:

UADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1

Addenda to FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Items (April 2014)

Paragraph 52.212-1(c), “Period for Acceptance of Offers,” is tailored as follows: “The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 90 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.”

The following is inserted as new paragraph (m) of the provision:

“(m) Quotation Preparation Instructions.

A. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of quotations, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein.

Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors.

Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. The response shall consist of three (3) separate parts; Part I - Summary and Miscellaneous Data, Part II - Price Quotation, Part III - Past Performance Quotation.

B. Specific Instructions:

1. PART I – SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS DATA. Submit original plus zero (0) copies.

(a) The offeror shall provide a concise summary and master table of contents of the entire quotation.

(b) Standard Form (SF) 1449. Complete blocks 12, 17a, 30a, 30b, and 30c. In doing so, the offeror accedes to the contract terms and conditions as written in the solicitation.

(c) Complete the necessary fill-ins and certifications in provisions and in the on-line Representations and Certifications at 30TUwww.sam.govU30T. Return the provision FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representations and Certifications – Commercial Items, along with the quotation. For other provisions and clauses in the solicitation, the offeror is required to submit the pages that require an offeror fill-in.

(d) Submit an acknowledgment of the all solicitation amendments, if issued.

(e) If applicable, provide a copy of the letter from the Small Business Administration (SBA) showing proof of Section 8(a) status.

(f) If none proposed, submit an Affirmation of no Exceptions, Deviations, or Waivers.

2. PART II – PRICE QUOTATION - Submit original plus zero (0) copies.

http://www.sam.gov/

(a) This Part shall contain a completed Schedule of Supplies/Services, continuation sheets of SF 1449, blocks 19 – 24.

(b) Insert proposed unit price(s) and extended amount(s) in the Schedule of Supplies/Services for Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) including all option periods. The extended amount must equal the unit price multiplied by the number of units. It is imperative that mathematical calculations are correct; particular care should be taken to ensure the amounts match when using the EXCEL program and the rounding of figures, limited to two decimal places.

c) Extreme care should be exercised to ensure that no price data of any kind are included in any other Part of the quotation.

3. PART III – PAST PERFORMANCE QUOTATION - Limited to no more than five (5) pages per contract listed. Only references for past efforts/contracts of relevance are desired. Submit original plus zero (0) copies.

(a) Quality and Satisfaction Rating of Contracts: Provide any information currently available (letters, metrics, customer surveys, independent surveys, etc.) that demonstrates customer satisfaction with overall job performance and/or quality of completed and/or ongoing contracts. In addition, explain corrective actions taken in the past, if any, for substandard performance and any current performance problems, such as cost overruns, extended performance periods, numerous warranty calls, etc. (See 52.212-2(d)(2))

(b) Performance Surveys/Questionnaires: Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) shall be used by the offeror in obtaining and providing past performance information. The government requires the offeror send out a PPQ to each of the Points-of-Contact (POCs) identified in the Past Performance Proposal (paragraph (c) below).

The offeror shall send out the PPQ (Attachment 2) to each of their references.

THE RESPONSIBILITY TO SEND OUT THE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE RESTS SOLELY

WITH THE OFFEROR.

Once the questionnaires are completed by the POCs, the information contained therein will be considered source selection sensitive and will not be released outside the government. The POCs shall forward their completed questionnaires directly to the government – NOT BACK TO THE OFFEROR.

PPQs shall be sent directly from your reference to this office marked to the attention of both SrA Michael McKenzie via e-mail to 30TUmichael.mckenzie.8@us.af.milU30T and MSgt Jerry Meeks via e-mail to 30TUjerry.meeks.1@us.af.milU30T , or fax at 042-551-0973 with attention to SrA Michael McKenzie. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that their reference sources receive the Past/Present Performance Survey in time to complete and return the Past/Present Performance Survey to 374th Contracting Squadron. No Past/Present Performance Survey will be accepted directly from the offeror being evaluated.

(c) Past Performance Information: Provide a list of no more than three (3) of the most relevant contracts performed for any customer. (See addendum to 52.212-2, paragraph (d)(2))

Furnish the following information for each contract listed:

(i) Company/Division name

(ii) Product/Service Description

(iii) Contracting Agency/Customer

(iv) Contract Number

(v) Contract Dollar Value

(vi) Period of Performance

(vii) Verified, up-to-date name, mailing and e-mail addresses, and telephone number of the contracting officer

(Point-of-Contact) mailto:michael.mckenzie.8@us.af.mil mailto:jerry.meeks.1@us.af.mil

(viii) Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

(ix) Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

Include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and identify aspects of the contracts deemed relevant and how they relate to the proposed effort. If an offeror has no past performance history of relevance, the offeror must affirmatively state it possesses no past performance history of relevance.

(d) The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance regarding (i) predecessor companies, (ii) will take into account past performance of key personnel who have relevant experience, and/or (iii) will take into account past performance regarding subcontractors that will perform major or criticalP

P aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this acquisition. Major aspects are identified in PWS paragraphs 1.1 thru 1.1.6.

(e) If a teaming arrangement is contemplated, provide complete information as to the arrangement, including any relevant and recent past performance information on previous teaming arrangements with same partner. If this is a first time joint effort, each party to the arrangement must provide a list of past contracts of relevance.

(f) Subcontractor Consent: Past performance information pertaining to a subcontractor cannot be disclosed to the prime offeror without the subcontractor’s consent. Provide with the quotation a letter from each subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspectsP

P of the requirement, consenting to the release of its past performance information to the prime contractor.

C. Documents submitted in response to this RFQ must be consistent with the following:

1. Requirements of the solicitation (CLINs and PWS) and government standards and regulations pertaining to the

PWS.

2. FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation – Commercial Items, of this solicitation.

3. Format for quotation Parts I and III shall be as follows:

(a) Each written Part of the quotation shall be separately bound and labeled and clearly identified on the front.

Each Part shall contain a Table of Contents, Cross References, and the List of Tables and Drawings (if applicable).

Cover pages, Table of Contents, and Tabs will not be counted against the page limits. The number of copies of each part is specified in paragraph B, Specific Instructions, above.

(b) The quotations will be on 8 1/2” x 11” paper or A4 size paper, except for fold-outs used for charts, tables, or diagrams, which may not exceed 11” x 17” or A3 size paper.

(c) A page is defined as one face of a sheet of paper containing information. Two pages may be printed on one sheet of paper.

(d) All printing shall be single-spaced. Spacing characteristics are applicable to charts and graphs.

(e) Typing shall not be less than 10 pitch. Size of print is applicable to charts and graphs.

(f) Page margins shall be a minimum of 1 inch top, bottom, and each side.

(g) Offerors can also submit electronic copies of quotation via e-mail. By submitting an electronic copy, offerors assume all risk of proposals not getting through security measures and firewalls. Only files created using Microsoft WORD, Microsoft EXCEL, and/or Adobe .pdf files will be accepted. No zip files will be accepted. If submitting quotations electronically, email the file(s) by the solicitation closing date and time to the following email addresses: 30TUmichael.mckenzie.8@us.af.milU30T and 30TUjerry.meeks.1@us.af.milU30T .

mailto:michael.mckenzie.8@us.af.mil mailto:jerry.meeks.1@us.af.mil

(h) Each Part shall be complete in itself and shall not reference information contained in other Parts. Page 1 of a Part is defined as the first page after the Table of Contents. All pages shall be numbered.

(i) Price data of any kind shall be presented only in the Price Quotation Part.

(j) Elaborate formats, bindings, and color presentations are not desired or required.

The following table summarizes the quotation submission:

(End of Addenda)

52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

U52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (OCT 2014)

(a) The government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

(1) Price

(2) Past Performance

(b) Options. The government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options will not obligate the government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, will result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

Addendum to FAR 52.212, Evaluation - Commercial Items

The following is inserted as new paragraph (d) of the provision:

(d) BASIS FOR CONTRACT AWARD: This is a competitive Limited Tradeoff (LTO) best value source selection conducted in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Parts 12 and 13 in which competing offerors’ past performance information will be evaluated on a basis Uapproximately equal toU price. By submission of its offer, the offeror accedes to all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. All offers will be treated equally except for their prices and performance records. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being

PART TITLE

ELECTRON

IC

COPY

PAPER

COPY

PAGE LIMIT DUE DATE

I Summary and Misc Data

1 N/A N/A See Block 8 of SF 1449

II Price 1 N/A N/A See Block 8 of SF 1449 III Past Performance 1 N/A 5 pages per contract See Block 8 of SF 1449 determined unacceptable. The government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest Total Evaluated Price (TEP), if the difference in the Past Performance Confidence Rating of another offeror justifies the higher price premium. In that event, the Source Selection Authority will make an integrated assessment best value award decision using the TEP and the Past Performance Confidence Rating. In order to be eligible for award, an offeror must have a rating of no less than RELEVANT with at least SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE under the Past Performance factor. The evaluation process will include the following:

(1) Price Evaluation Factor. The government will rank all offers by Total Evaluation Price (TEP) for Contract Line Item Numbers (CLINs) 0001, 0002, 0003, 1001, 2001, & 2003. The price evaluation will document the fairness and reasonableness of the total evaluated price (TEP).

Total Evaluated Price: A TEP will be computed for each offer in order to meet the requirements of FAR Parts 6 and

17. The price of a six-month extension authorized by 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, will be added to the proposed price for each potential contract performance period.

The TEP is a two-part computation. First, the offeror’s total proposed price will be determined by multiplying the quantities identified in the Pricing Schedule (SF 1449, continuation of blocks 19 – 24) by the unit price, limited to two decimal places, for each Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) to confirm the extended total amount for each CLIN; the sum of all extended amounts will be the offeror’s total proposed price. Second, the total proposed price (total amount for CLINs 0001, 0002, 0003, 1001, 2001, & 2003) plus the sum of Option to Extend Services clause 52.217-8 formula (shown below) will constitute the TEP.

The formula for the Option to Extend Services amount is as follows:

Base Year = CLIN Extended Amount x 0.5* Option Year 1 = CLIN Extended Amount x 0.5* Option Year 2 = CLIN Extended Amount x 0.5*

Note: *0.5 is the multiplicative factor used to derive the 6 months quantity value.

Evaluating the Option CLINs does not obligate the government to exercise the Options.

(2) Past Performance Factor. The government will evaluate recent and relevant performance information on all offerors based on (i) the references provided by the offeror, and (ii) any past performance information obtained from survey/questionnaires U(Attachment 2)U, and (iii) any data independently obtained by the government. If a reference identified by the offeror in accordance with 52.212-1(m)B.3(c), does not submit a survey/questionnaire, the government will follow up with the reference POC, but it is not responsible for the failure of a reference POC to provide a survey/questionnaire.

Past performance regarding predecessor companies of the offeror and/or subcontractors, key personnel, and subcontractors that will perform major aspects as identified in PWS, paragraphs 1.1 thru 1.1.6 of the requirement, if applicable (see 52.212-1(m)B.3(d)), will be rated as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror.

(A) Recent past performance information includes contracts performed and/or being performed for any customer within the last three (3) years from the issuance date of the solicitation.

(B) Relevant contracts performance effort involved similar scope, magnitude of effort, and complexities to that required by this solicitation. The government will assess relevancy for each contract and assign a rating as described in Table 2 below:

Table 2. Past Performance Relevancy Ratings Rating Rating Definition

VERY RELEVANT Present/past performance involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities as the effort required by this solicitation

RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

SOMEWHAT

RELEVANT

Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

NOT RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

(C) Performance Quality Assessment: For each of the recent past performance information reviewed, the performance quality of work will be assessed based on the (i) Quality Assessment Criteria evaluated under paragraph 4 of Present/Past Performance Survey/Questionnaire (Solicitation Attachment 2) and (ii) the evaluation ratings in the Federal Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), if available.

(D) The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to assess the degree of confidence the Government has in the offeror’s ability to meet the solicitation requirements based on the offeror’s demonstrated record of performance.

The assessment process will result in an offeror’s overall performance confidence assessment rating of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Limited Confidence, No Confidence, or Unknown Confidence. Offerors with no recent past or present performance history or the offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned will receive the rating “Unknown Confidence,” meaning the offeror is treated neither favorably nor unfavorably (neutral). As a result of the relevancy and performance quality assessments, offerors will receive an integrated past performance confidence assessment rating as described in Table 3 below:

TABLE 3. Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings Rating Description

SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

LIMITED CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

NO CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE

No performance is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

Note: In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

(4) The government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

(5) Integrated Assessment. The government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest price offer if the difference in the Past Performance Confidence Rating of another offeror justifies the higher price premium. In that event, the Source Selection Authority will make an integrated assessment best value award decision using the TEP and the Past Performance Confidence Rating.

(End of provision)

(End of Summary of Changes)