JPARC Exercise AG RTO PWS Restructured.pdf

CUI

Performance Work Statement (PWS) Summary: Red Flag-Alaska Tactical and Operational Support

1.0 Scope

This Performance Work Statement (PWS) defines the requirements for specialized contractor support providing tactical control, threat emulation, post-mission data validation, and intelligence integration services essential for the successful execution of Large Force Exercises (LFE) Red Flag-Alaska (RF-AK) and Northern Edge (NE) run by U.S. Air Force (USAF) 353rd Combat Training Squadron within the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex (JPARC). The Contractor shall provide a highly qualified team of subject matter experts (SMEs) with instructor or Weapons Officer level experience in the core competencies of Tactical Control, Threat Emulation, Mission Data Integrity & Debrief Readiness, and Operational & Intelligence Inetgration.

The integration of these expert services is critical to enhancing the fidelity of air-to-air and air-to-surface training for all participants, maximizing pilot proficiency and tactical knowledge transfer in a highly contested environment.

1.1 Primary Objective: The primary objective of this contract is for the contractor to provide solutions focused on the Red Flag-Alaska and Northern Edge exercises. The contractor shall provide expert personnel to meet the core competencies and software (provided by the contractor) capable of validating air-to-surface munitions while integrating into JPARC infrastructure, as specified in section 2.4 of this PWS. These elements will be used to plan, execute, and manage tactical control, threat emulation, mission data, debrief, and intelligence integration to reduce the administrative and operational burden on Red Flag-Alaska personnel.

2.0. Definitions

2.1 Tactical Control, Threat Emulation: The requirement of providing continuous, high-fidelity threat and airspace management within the exercise control structure.

Positions that relate to this task are SAM-1, Air-to-Surface RTO, Air-to-Air RTO, HARM Assessor, and White Force Exercise Support.

2.2 Mission Data Integrity and Debrief Readiness: The requirement of ensuring that the Mission Commander is fully prepared and enabled to begin the mission debrief on schedule with accurate, validated truth data. SAM-1, Air-to-Surface RTOs, Air-to-Air RTOs, and HARM Assessors will pass all requested information from each vulnerability period (vul) to the Mission Commander to help with debrief preparation.

2.3 Operational and Intelligence Integration: The requirement of providing SMEs with the ability to provide specialized advisory support to exercise planning and intelligence cells that coordinate with White Force, assist 353 CTS intelligence, and support red air.

2.4 Red Flag- Alaska: PACAF's premiere daytime joint Large Force Employment (LFE) exercise and AEF spin-up event emphasizing large force employment tactics using air, maritime, ground, and special operations forces. RF-A is designed to provide the finest training possible, ensuring participating pilots and aircrew receive maximum sorties in a realistic simulated combat environment.

2.5 Northern Edge: USINDOPACOM Joint Exercise Program (JEP) sponsored event and PACAF is the Office Conducting the Exercise (OCE). NE is a multi-domain Field

Training Exercise (FTX) focused on tactical to operational level requirements and transformation initiatives and conducted bi-annually (every odd year) in Alaska employing the Joint Pacific-Alaska Range Complex (JPARC) and Temporary Maritime Activities Area (TMAA) in the Gulf of Alaska (GOA). Units participating in the joint exercise will primarily operate from Eielson Air Force Base (AFB), Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER) Alaska, and at sea in the GOA. NE provides the opportunity to train tier three and four level joint tactical units in a realistic simulated contested combat environment. NE is also a premier Electronic Warfare venue for the testing of joint tactics, technics, and procedural innovations. PACAF as the OCE is responsible for organizing, planning, executing, and assessing NE on behalf of USINDOPACOM in coordination with other components, PACFLT, USARPAC, and MARFORPAC. NE differs from RF-A in that a majority of the planning will be conducted by USINDOPACOM and the OCE and coordinated with other components and PACAF forces. Direction, instruction and taskings will flow to subordinate units and organizations via separate USINDOPACOM Initiating Directives and PACAF Tasking Orders (TASKORD).

3.0 Description of Services

3.1 Tactical Control and Threat Emulation

3.1.1 Objective: The contractor shall provide seven personnel with the experience and expertise required to provide continuous, high-fidelity threat and airspace management expertise within the exercise control structure.

3.1.2 Performance Standard:

3.1.2.1. The contractor shall perform a comprehensive analysis of JPARC range assets and provide formal recommendations to the 353 CTS exercise planning team to assist the Range Squadron (RANS) and 353 CTS with range characterization efforts to maximize range asset position awareness and asset integration into exercise scenarios. The contractor's performance will be measured by the delivery of these recommendations by the end of each SDC and, at a minimum, address range asset position awareness and asset integration.

3.1.2.2. Execute 100% of scheduled exercise flight operations. The Contractor shall facilitate the execution of a minimum of two (2) distinct exercise vulnerability periods (vuls) per day and their associated planning periods to maximize complex scenario exposure for Blue Forces, except when canceled or delayed for reasons beyond the contractor's reasonable control, including but not limited to severe weather, government-directed stand-downs, or failure of Government-Furnished Equipment.

3.1.2.3. In accordance with the above exercise flight operations, the following positions are required for each vul:

3.1.2.3.1 The contractor shall provide at least two SMEs (one per vul) to fill the SAM-1 role. This task requires personnel to organize, plan, and execute adversary Ground Based Air Defense (GBAD) scheme of maneuver and simulated Integrated Air Defense System (sIADS) integration in accordance with adversary tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and participant desired learning objectives.

3.1.2.3.2 The Contractor shall provide at least two (one per vul) Air-to- Surface Range Training Officers to assess simulated Air-to-Surface weapons employment and provide real-time assessment of simulated bomb hit assessment and bomb damage assessment.

3.1.2.3.3 The Contractor shall provide at least two (one per vul) High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM) assessors to provide real-time assessment of simulated HARM shot achievement of desired weapons effects.

3.1.2.3.4 The Contractor shall provide four SMEs to fill the Air-to-Air RTO role to provide real-time assessment of air-to-air missile shots for both blue and red forces. Blue forces are exercise participants that are training to United States, Joint Service, and Coalition Forces tactics. Red Forces are defined as exercise participants replicating adversary tactics.

3.1.2.4. The contractor shall provide a dedicated team of at least one qualified SMEs to supplement White Force Exercise Support. The performance standard is met when the Contractor provides qualified SMEs for 100% of the request White Force support roles for all scheduled vuls. Operating under the direction of the COR, with input from the 353 CTS Commander and Director of Operations, the contractor shall be responsible for performing the following tasks to ensure successful execution of the exercise framework:

3.1.2.4.1 Adversary Coordination

3.1.2.4.2 Tactical Mentorship

3.1.2.4.3 White Force Exercise Control

3.1.2.4.4 Fulfill roles that provide exercise framework or oversee execution as directed by the COR, who may act on the recommendation of CTS Leadership, based on individual exercise requirements.

3.2 Mission Data Integrity and Debrief Readiness

3.2.1 Objective: Ensure the Mission Commander is fully prepared and enabled to begin the mission debrief on schedule with accurate, validated truth data.

3.2.2 Performance Standard:

3.2.2.1 Provide at least four SMEs (two per vul) to lead the shot validation process as both MiG-1 and SAM-1 post vul. These SMEs can be personnel filling any other position, including but not limited to Air-to-Surface RTO or SAM-1. The Contractor commits to completing all required preparations and analysis to ensure the Mission Commander is ready to start the shot validation debrief no later than 2 hours and 15 minutes (2+15) after mission termination. The Contractor shall execute the shot validation and aid the Mission Commander in identifying Debrief Focus Points (DFPs) for exercise participants.

3.2.2.2 The COR will provide the Contractor with all necessary debrief materials no later than six months prior to exercise execution.

3.2.2.3 The Contractor shall be prepared to execute the debrief and shot validation in accordance with the 3-1 Shot Kill. Specific requirements from this document will be provided to the Contractor no later than six months prior to exercise execution.

3.2.2.4 The contractor shall run the provided debrief software to facilitate the shot validation and maximize participant learning.

3.3 Operational and Intelligence Integration

3.3.1 Objective: Provide two qualified SMEs with the ability to provide specialized advisory support to exercise planning and intelligence cells.

3.3.2 Performance Standard:

3.3.2.1 Offer continuous, expert advice and coordination for operations and intelligence White Cell functions, specifically in coordination with the Combat Training Squadron (CTS), ensuring scenario realism and synchronization with current TTPs.

3.3.2.2 Provide Adversary SMEs to assist the intelligence shop and red air lead during mission planning, briefing, execution, and debrief to ensure accurate red air replication.

3.3.2.2.1 The 353 CTS will provide specific Red threats no later than six months prior to exercise execution as they vary based on participant desired learning objectives and exercise complexity.

3.3.2.3 Integrate into the 353 CTS Intelligence shop, reporting to the CTS Intelligence Flight Commander or NCOIC with responsibility for assisting with the following duties:

3.3.2.3.1 Weaponeering

3.3.2.3.2 Scenario Development

3.3.2.3.3 White Force Intelligence Coordination

3.3.2.4 Performance will be measured by the successful and timely completion of all assigned intelligence tasks during mission planning, as validated by the on-site Contracting Officer’s Representative, acting on input from CTS Personnel.

3.4 Contractor Provided Software Requirements

3.4.1 Objective: Provide software that enables real-time Air-to-Surface weapons validation within four feet of accuracy for up to 400 targets in a vul.

3.4.2 Performance Standard:

3.4.2.1 Provide software that validates all air-to-surface munitions in the Air Force Inventory with 99.9% accuracy in accordance with updated weapons testing data and integrates into the JPARC infrastructure with <2 critical issues per exercise and <5 minor issues per exercise. Critical issues are defined as any software problem that pauses mission planning for more than 30 minutes, ends execution during a vul, or delays debrief by more than one hour for Red Flag Alaska and Northern Edge exercises. A minor issue is defined as any software problem that degrades or pauses mission planning by more than 15 minutes, delays Air-to-Surface response during exercise execution by more than 5 minutes, delays debrief by more than 30 minutes but less than an hour These issues will be tracked by 353 CTS personnel.

3.4.2.2 Develop and execute real-time simulated Air-to-Surface weapons employment assessment, including non-kinetic integration (as described in Air Force Doctrine Publication 3-60) and debrief assessment.

3.5 General Information

3.5.1 The exercise schedule is as follows:

3.5.1.1 During even years (ex: 2026), the 353 CTS hosts Red Flag-Alaska -1, -2, and -3 exercises.

3.5.1.2 During odd years (ex: 2027), the 353 CTS hosts Red Flag-Alaska -2 and -3 Exercises as well as Northern Edge.

3.5.2 The Contractor shall supply the names of their employees who are readily available and maintain proper coordination with Red Flag-Alaska leadership.

3.5.3 The Contractor shall be available for all Red Flag-Alaska and Northern Edge planning conferences and for two distinct VULs on all exercise days.

3.5.3.1 The planning conference that the Contractor shall be available for is called the Scenario Design Conference. It is a week-long conference that is hosted at the 353rd CTS approximately seven months prior to exercise execution.

3.5.3.2 The Contractor shall send up to three personnel with the appropriate training, qualifications, and security clearances (as discussed in section 1.0 and 3.4) to help facilitate planning.

3.5.3.4 Red Flag-Alaska and Northern Edge exercises are two weeks long with two vuls per day (except the final Friday of the exercise).

3.5.4 The contractor shall hire and maintain a sufficient number of qualified personnel.

This is defined as up to 17 personnel for Red Flag-Alaska -1 and -2 exercises, 18 personnel for Northern Edge, and 21 personnel for Red Flag Alaska -3 exercises.

3.6 Key Positions

3.6.1 The individuals hired by the contractor shall have the qualifications defined in section

1.0 of this PWS. All personnel hired by the contractor must possess necessary security clearances, ranging from SECRET to TOP SECRET, with SCI and SAP access as required, to meet all the requirements of this contract. Task areas requiring personnel with TS, SCI, and/or SAP clearances include:

3.6.1.1 Operations SMEs

3.6.1.1.1 Roles: Squadron Commander’s representative and responsible for JECG supervision during RF-A execution. The Operations Supervision cell is a mandatory function that monitors and controls exercise air operations for 3x RF-A (or comparable) exercises per year. This position is the senior White Force authority.

3.6.1.1.2 Responsibilities: Ensures JECG and WFCC effectiveness during RF-A daily mission planning, execution, and debrief and verifies JECG compliance with RF-A SPINS and the Squadron Standard Operating Procedures. Guarantees safe and effective exercise execution on behalf of 354 FW/CC in coordination with Deployed Forces CC (DF/CC). Mission Cancel authority when conditions prevent safe execution. directly responsible for oversight of the planning and execution of all missions to ensure safe completion of the missions including exercise cancellation. During execution, the Operations Supervision monitors the exercise missions from the WF Control Center and is the final authority for all missions.

3.6.1.2 Airboss

3.6.1.2.1 Roles: Owner of assigned VUL from mission planning through debrief. Airboss leads JECG and outside agency coordination to match DLOs (desired learning objectives) and scenario, enables VUL execution, and ensures adherence to MSOE and SPINS. Backup to Tac Mentor for ensuring Blue training.

3.6.1.2.2 Responsibilities: Responsible for all aspects of air operations for exercises. Monitors and controls all aircraft including those on the airfield, airborne aircraft, and all aircraft participating in the daily missions. Aircraft desiring to operate within the control zone must obtain approval from the Airboss prior to entry. Works closely with the Mission CC to ensure they develop and brief a safe plan to support exercise objectives and is responsible to monitor every phase of the assigned missions. Maintains close contact with the Operations Supervision, Range Control Officer (RCO), Federal Aviation Administration, and all exercise personnel to ensure the safe and orderly conduct of the assigned missions. Additionally, the Airboss must provide written approval for all air tasking order (ATO) changes and has the authority to cancel or modify missions of exercise aircraft for safety purposes.

3.6.1.3 Tactical Mentors

3.6.1.3.1 Roles: The primary entity responsible for ensuring valid Blue training. These individuals are tactical experts (WIC graduate or senior instructor) that guide Blue mission planning, execution, and debrief.

3.6.1.3.2 Responsibilities: Work with the JECG to tailor each scenario to match Blue DLOs and improve learning. Responsible for facilitating tactical learning by assisting the Mission Commander, adjusting the scenario, guiding DFB Development, and achieving DLOs for the entire Blue Force.

3.6.1.4 Debriefers

3.6.1.4.1 Roles: Facilitate the mass debrief for all participants.

3.6.1.4.2 Responsibilities: Runs the shot validation. Augmented by personnel filling any other position, including but not limited to Air-to-Surface RTO or

SAM-1.

3.6.1.5 Adversary SMEs- including Air-to-Air, GBAD, and sIADS

3.6.1.5.1 Roles: The expert on adversary TTPs.

3.6.1.5.2 Responsibilities: Builds the adversary Air Order of Battle (AOB) and C2 gameplan in coordination with JECG for Air-to-Air, GBAD, and sIADS. Provides expert advice to the Red-1 on how the Red Aircraft, GBAD, and sIADS should operate during vul execution

3.6.1.6 Intelligence Support

3.6.1.6.1 Roles: Offer continuous, expert advice and coordination for operations and intelligence White Cell functions, specifically in coordination with the Combat Training Squadron (CTS), ensuring scenario realism and synchronization with current TTPs.

3.6.1.6.2 Responsibilities: Assist with weaponeering, scenario development, and White Force intelligence coordination.

3.6.1.7 White Force Roles

3.6.1.7.1 Roles: Also known as Joint Exercise Control Group (JECG), they execute exercise control.

3.6.1.7.2 Responsibilities: Responsible for managing the scenario during mission planning and vuls to help participants achieve DLOs. Works with the Airboss and Tactical Mentor to shape the scenario during vul planning and execution.

3.6.1.8 SAM-1

3.6.1.8.1 Roles: Leads OPFOR EW (Electronic Warfare) and MOB (Missile Order of Battle) IADS replication in coordination with JECG. Assesses Red surface-to-air and Blue air-to-surface weapons effects during each vul. The SAM-1 directs the placement of SAM systems throughout the JPARC for 3x RF-A (or comparable) exercises per year.

3.6.1.8.2 Responsibilities: Develop the IADS by replicating high threat environments. Prior to each exercise, a SAM Threat Matrix is developed that establishes the Defensive Missile Order of Battle game plan in accordance with threat scenarios developed in the exercise planning conference. Complete planning requirements for next day execution by coordinating SAM threats IAW the threat scenarios during the exercise. Controls a large array of SAM threat simulators, both manned and unmanned, to target participants IAW real-world threat tactics during a mission. Assesses effects of surface-to-air shots on participant aircraft and air-to-ground munitions effects on surface threats and controls the global positioning system, communications jamming, and spoofing game plan for execution. Record video feed taken by the SAM threats to provide participants feedback on the effectiveness of aircraft defensive threat reactions. Assist with mission reconstruction prior to and during shot validation.

3.6.1.9 Air-to-Air RTOs

3.6.1.9.1 Roles: The personnel who assess air to air weapons.

3.6.1.9.2 Responsibilities: Provide real-time assessment of air-to-air missile shots for both blue and red forces. Assist with mission reconstruction prior to and during shot validation.

3.6.10 Air-to-Surface RTOs

3.6.1.9.1 Roles: The personnel who assess air to surface weapons.

3.6.1.9.2 Responsibilities: Assess simulated Air-to-Surface weapons employment and provide real-time assessment of simulated bomb hit assessment and bomb damage assessment. Assist with mission reconstruction prior to and during shot validation.

3.6.1.11 HARM Assessors

3.6.1.10.1 Roles: The personnel who assess HARM shots.

3.6.1.10.2 Responsibilities: Provide real-time assessment of HARM shots during a vul. Assist with mission reconstruction prior to and during the shot validation.

3.7 The instructor or Weapons Officer level experience required for all positions is the primary qualification for fulfilling White Force Exercise Support roles. No additional or separate certification is required.

3.8 As exercise requirements change depending on participants and desired learning objectives, the COR, with input from 353 CTS Leadership, will provide the Contractor with any changes to position requirements no later than six months prior to execution. For example, some exercises may not utilize HARM Assessors but instead require more Air-to-Surface RTOs. Additionally, the COR, who may act on recommendation of 353 CTS Leadership, will provide the Contractor with augmented position requirements for Red Flag Alaska -3 no later than six months prior to execution.

3.9 Any changes requested by the 353 CTS inside the six-month window may be accommodated subject to mutual agreement of the parties and a contract modification, if required, to account of any cost or scheduling impacts.

4.0 Supplemental Information

4.1 The following personnel are representatives for this project:

4.1.1 Maj Chanci L. Pietrzak, COR

Phone#: 907-377-1019, Email: chanci.pietrzak@us.af.mil

4.1.2 Mr. Tim S. Smith, Program Analyst

Phone#: 907-377-4854, Email: timothy.smith.204@us.af.mil

4.2 The Contractor shall become thoroughly familiar with all details of Red Flag Alaska operations processes to ensure it will not conflict with exercise planning or execution.

4.3 Security Requirements- The Contractor shall be responsible for safeguarding all Government property and controlled forms provided for contractor use. At the end of each work period, all Government facilities, equipment, and materials shall be secured. Also, the contractor shall ensure the pass and identification items required for contract performance are obtained for employees and non-Government owned vehicles.

4.4 Personnel Special Qualifications- Prior to the start of the performance period, the Contractor shall possess a Facility Security Clearance (FCL) adjudicated to the TOP SECRET (TS) level. Personnel shall also possess the required SENSITIVE COMPARTMENTED INFORMATION (SCI), and/or SPECIAL ACCESS PROGRAM (SAP). A detailed listing of functions requiring TS/SCI and/or SAP clearances is found in Section 3.5.4 of this PWS.

4.5 Data Rights:

4.5.1 The 353 CTS will have unlimited rights in all deliverables, data, reports, and materials first created or generated by the Contractor in the performance of this contract. This includes, but is not limited to, exercise analysis, recommendations, debrief materials, and validated mission data.

4.5.2 Contractor Provided Air-to-Surface Validation Software: The Contractor's proprietary software shall remain the property of the Contractor. The Government shall receive Restricted Rights to use this pre-existing, privately funded software.

5.0 General Information

5.1 Contractor Installation Entry Requirements- The Contractor shall submit an entry authority list (EAL) to 354 CONS for any contractor employees requiring frequent access. EAL template may be obtained from 354 CONS after award of the contract. Please allow up to 48 hours for EAL verification and approval from 354 SFS. The Contractor will ensure that appropriate personnel and equipment meet installation access requirements before performance begins.

5.2 Security Requirements

5.2.1 Contractor Security Clearances

5.2.1.1 At a minimum a SECRET level clearance shall be required for all personnel supporting this effort. Contractor personnel may be required to access, view, possess, process and/or use classified information, information systems and workspaces to successfully complete requirements under this contract. Some Contractors will be required to handle/store Top Secret - Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI) and/or Special Access Program / Special Access Required (SAP/SAR), and therefore must have the appropriate clearances. Any classified material shall be stored in Government facilities. The Contractor shall provide access to a Security Manager to implement a security program to include documentation control, software control, and Automated Information System control in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program, if required. The Contractor shall provide a Facilities Security Officer to implement the security program to include personnel security programs, software security and documents controls in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program (NISP).

5.2.2 Visiting Government Facilities

5.2.2.1 Contractor personnel shall be issued identification badges by the Government. The badges shall be clearly visible at all times while Contractor personnel are on Government premises and clearly indicate “Contractor” on them. The Contractor shall furnish all information required to facilitate the use and possession of the badges. The Contractor shall be responsible for ensuring that all badges issued to Contractor employees are returned immediately following completion of the contract, relocation or termination of an employee, and/or upon request of the PCO or the COR.

5.2.2.2 Contractor will ensure all employees comply with Federal, State, and local health and safety guidance, and Installation Force Protection Condition (FPCON) measures to ensure the safety, health, and welfare of DOD personnel involved in the performance of this effort.

This includes Centers for Disease Control pandemic mitigation measures pertaining to screening/testing, wear of personal protective equipment, social distancing and other social prohibitions, quarantine/isolation, vaccine administration, and disinfecting/cleaning.

5.2.3 Common Access Cards (CAC)

5.2.3.1 All on-site Contractor personnel shall obtain a DoD issued CAC for frequent access to US Government facilities and Information Technology systems. The Contractor shall be responsible for requesting all CACs through the CO or COR.

5.2.4 Anti-Terrorism (AT) Level 1 Awareness Training

5.2.4.1 All Contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access to Military Installations, facilities and controlled access areas, shall complete AT Level I awareness training within 30 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable. The Contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected Contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the contracting officer. AT level I awareness training is available at the following website: https://jko.jten.mil/courses/AT-level1/launch.html.

5.2.5 Access and General Protection/Security Policy and Procedures

5.2.5.1 The Contractor and all associated subcontractor employees shall comply with applicable installation, facility, and Area Commander Installation and/or facility access and local security policies and procedures (provided by government representative). The Contractor shall also provide all information required for background checks to meet Installation access requirements to be accomplished by Installation Provost Marshal Office, Director of Emergency Services, or Security Office. The Contractor workforce must comply with all personal identity verification requirements as directed by DoD, Headquarters Department of the Army (HQDA) and/or local policy. In addition to the changes otherwise authorized by the changes clause of this contract, should the Force Protection Condition (FPCON) at any individual facility or installation change, the Government may require changes in Contractor security matters or processes.

5.2.6 OPSEC Training

5.2.6.1 Per AR 530-1, Operations Security, new Contractor employees must complete Level I OPSEC training within 30 calendar days of their reporting for duty. All Contractor employees must complete annual OPSEC awareness training.

5.2.7 Information Assurance Awareness Training/Certification

5.2.7.1 All Contractor employees with access to a government Information System (IS) must successfully complete the DoD Information Assurance Awareness training prior to access to the IS and then annually thereafter. All Contractor employees working IA, Information Technology (IT) functions, or having privileged systems accounts must comply with DoD and Air Force training requirements in DoDD 8140.01, DoD 8140.01-M within six months of employment.

5.2.7.2 Contractor personnel performing work on Government IT systems including NIPR, local enclaves will have qualifications fulfilling the IT (Cyberspace) workforce element, the Network Operations Specialist, System Administrator, and Technical Support Specialist work roles at a high level of proficiency.

5.2.8 Interaction and/or Disclosure with Foreign Country/Foreign National Personnel

5.2.8.1 The Contractor shall comply with Foreign Disclosure and Contacts with Foreign Representatives IAW AR 380‐10, DoD 5230.11, Disclosure of Classified Military Information to Foreign Governments and International Organizations, DoD 5230.20, Visits, Assignments, and Exchanges of Foreign Nationals.