Q_ _A__Hangar_Flooring__4.pdf

PDF 96 KB Posted

Attached to
Hangar Floor Repaint Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA5004-15-B-C007
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Pacific Air Forces

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Hangar Floor Repaint, newest first.
File Type Posted
JA-0_-_Statement_of_Work_4_June_2015.pdf PDF
Q_ _A_Hangar_Flooring__6.pdf PDF
FA5004-15-B-C007-0004.pdf PDF
JA-4_-_AF_Form_66_Schedule_of_Material_Submittals_4_June_2015.xls XLS spreadsheet
JA_1_-_Specifications_4_June_2015.pdf PDF
Q__A_Hangar_Floor__5.pdf PDF
Q_ _A_Hangar_Flooring__7.pdf PDF
JA-4_-_AF_Form_66_FTQW_15-1021.xls XLS spreadsheet
JA-0_-_Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF
JA-1_-_Specifications.pdf PDF
FA5004-15-B-C007-0003.pdf PDF
Amendment__2.pdf PDF
Q__A_Hangar_Floor__3.pdf PDF
Q__A_Hangar_Flooring__2.pdf PDF
Q__A_Hangar_Flooring__1.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Sign_in_Sheet_Hangar_Floor.pdf PDF
FA5004-15-B-C007_Mod_00001.pdf PDF
JA-1_-_Specifications_14_May_2015.pdf PDF
FA5004-15-B-C007_-_Hangar_Floor_IFB.pdf PDF
JA-2_-_Taxiway_and_stationary_line_markings.pdf PDF
JA-4_-_Floorplan.pdf PDF
JA-1_-_Specifications.pdf PDF
JA-0_-_Statement_of_Work.pdf PDF
JA-3_-_ETL_96-5.pdf PDF
JA-7_-_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
JA-6_-_Photos.pdf PDF
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Answers to Questions #4

Project FTQW 15-1021

Repaint Hangar Floor (B1232)

21 May, 2015

Q1. Reference Section 09 67 23.15 Page 16: If mechanical grinding prepares the surface sufficiently for coating, is shot blast required?

A1. If the contractor prepares the floor with a grinder IAW ETL 96-5 and the specifications, shot blasting is not required. The contractor must also make sure to keep the airfield free of FOD no matter what method they use.

Q2. Reference Section 09 67 23.15, 1.3.2.2 Flooring System Applicator Qualifications, Page

11: Is certification required or will the technical representative signing off on the project and the

NACE inspections be sufficient?

A2. As long as they have a certified NACE inspector and technical representative will be enough.

Q3. Is the technical representative supplied by the Army Corp of Engineers or do we supply one from the epoxy manufacturer?

A3. The contractor shall supply the their technical representative.

Q4. The work plan listed in Section 9, page 11 states that the work shall be completed within approximately 12 consecutive days. Is this correct or do we have more time? I see this project taking approximately 20-30 days.

A4. This is something we will have to discuss with the user. Due to the time of year it'll be tricky to be flexible, but I think they'll realize how much time is needed to actually finish this and be good to

go. Like I said though, we'll have to get with the user and communicate with them about it.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .