FA5000-11-T-0012-0001.pdf

F1W3QC1063A001

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to:

a. Correct the G.A. Braun part numbers listed in subCLIN 0001AA from 50BTWILC-4 to 150BTWILC-4; in subCLIN 0001AC from DCSE150X2 to ESHNF150X2; and in subCLIN 0001AD from 300PBS-S to 300PT-SH.

b. Change the installation timeframe from three (3) days to tw o (2) w eeks.

c. Extend the quote submission date/time from 31 August 2011 to 2 September 2011 at 12:00 PM Alaskan Time.

d. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

e. The POC for this amendment is SrA Bethany Carlan, (907)552-7170, bethany.carlan@elmendorf.af.mil

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 29-Aug-2011

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA5000-11-T-0012

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Aug-2011

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

29-Aug-2011

CODE

FA5000 - 673D CONTRACTING SQUADRON

10480 22ND STREET

JBER AK 99506-2501

FA5000 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

FA5000-11-T-0012

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 31-Aug-2011 12:00 PM to 02-Sep-2011 12:00 PM.

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

SUBCLIN 0001AA

The CLIN extended description has changed from G A Braun SmoothFlow T Batch Tunnel Loading Conveyor, p/n 50BTWILC-4 or equal item is acceptable. Quantity 1 EA.The batch tunnel loading conveyor must be a five compartment model capable of loading the same amount of weight as each module in the accompanying batch washer. It must be capable of weighing the goods and sending that information for display to the operator. to G A Braun SmoothFlow T Batch Tunnel Loading Conveyor, p/n 150BTWILC-4 or equal item is acceptable. Quantity 1 EA.The batch tunnel loading conveyor must be a five compartment model capable of loading the same amount of weight as each module in the accompanying batch washer. It must be capable of weighing the goods and sending that information for display to the operator..

SUBCLIN 0001AC

The CLIN extended description has changed from G A Braun SmoothFlow T Dual Cake Storage Elevator, P/N DCSE150X2 or equal item is acceptable. Quantity 1 EA.The dual cake storage elevator must be capable of directly receiving one or two cakes from the existing membrane press's storage conveyor automatically and load them into the three dryers. Must be capable of receiving, transporting and delivering any linen types to include 100% polyester textiles. The shuttle must automatically elevate the goods to the proper height for automatic loading into the batch dryers and shall have both audio and visual alarm systems indicating movement. to G A Braun SmoothFlow Elevating/Nesting Shuttle System, P/N ESHNF150X2 or equal item is acceptable. Quantity 1 EA.The dual cake storage elevator must be capable of directly receiving one or two cakes from the existing membrane press's storage conveyor automatically and load them into the three dryers. Must be capable of receiving, transporting and delivering any linen types to include 100% polyester textiles. The shuttle must automatically elevate the goods to the proper height for automatic loading into the batch dryers and shall have both audio and visual alarm systems indicating movement..

SUBCLIN 0001AD

The CLIN extended description has changed from G A Braun SmoothFlow T steam heated batch/cake dryer, P/N 300PBS-S or equal item is acceptable. Quantity 3 EA.The steam heated batch/cake dryers shall consist of a minimum of three (3) 220-300 lb steam heated dryers capable of processing two batch washer loads simultaneously. Loads must be automatically received from the shuttle conveyor and automatically discharged after tumbling. Each individual dryer must have the capacity to display operating parameters (i.e. valve position, inlet temperature, outlet temperature, etc. )on a central display console. Must be heated by high- pressure ( 85-120psi ) steam and include automatic sprinklers. Dryer controls must be capable of accepting a minimum of 16 dry codes or programs for full loads ( two washer batches ) & a minimum of 16 separate dry codes for partial loads ( single washer batch ). Must include inverter-controlled motors on blower fans and basket drive motors. Dryer cylinder basket minimum volume shall be 108 cubic ft. constructed from stainless steel and include removable Teflon coated panels. There must be a centrally located display screen near the dryer discharge area provided to show the operator what goods are to be discharged out of each dryer. The full system of dryers must be capable of full-drying up to

990 lbs per hour on average. to G A Braun SmoothFlow T steam heated batch/cake dryer, P/N 300PT-SH or equal item is acceptable. Quantity 3 EA.The steam heated batch/cake dryers shall consist of a minimum of three (3) 220- 300 lb steam heated dryers capable of processing two batch washer loads simultaneously. Loads must be automatically received from the shuttle conveyor and automatically discharged after tumbling. Each individual dryer must have the capacity to display operating parameters (i.e. valve position, inlet temperature, outlet temperature, etc.

)on a central display console. Must be heated by high- pressure ( 85-120psi ) steam and include automatic sprinklers.

Dryer controls must be capable of accepting a minimum of 16 dry codes or programs for full loads ( two washer batches ) & a minimum of 16 separate dry codes for partial loads ( single washer batch ). Must include inverter-controlled motors on blower fans and basket drive motors. Dryer cylinder basket minimum volume shall be 108 cubic ft. constructed from stainless steel and include removable Teflon coated panels. There must be a centrally located display screen near the dryer discharge area provided to show the operator what goods are to be discharged out of each dryer. The full system of dryers must be capable of full-drying up to 990 lbs per hour on average..

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-2

ADDENDA TO 52.212-2

EVALUATION CRITERIA

The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

Technical and past performance, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price.

This award selection will be conducted using the procedures (as specified herein) from the policies and procedures contained in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) LPTA-Lowest Price Technically Acceptable selection process shall be applied. Award will be made to the Offeror who is deemed responsible and responsive that reflects a complete understanding of the specifications for the Request for Proposal. Award shall be made to the technically acceptable offer with the lowest evaluated price. The Government reserves the right to refrain from awarding to any contractor in the event that all Offerors progressing beyond the technically acceptable evaluation are determined to have offered pricing that is not considered realistic, reasonable, or complete. To arrive at an award decision, the Contracting Officer (C.O.) will integrate the Technical Evaluation Team results based on the factors described in the paragraphs that follow. To be eligible for award, a proposal must meet all technical requirements, conform to all required terms and conditions, including FAR 52.212-1 Addendum, and include all information required.

If the lowest priced evaluated offer is judged to have an “Acceptable” technical rating, has an “Acceptable” performance rating and is determined to be responsible, that offer represents the best value for the government and the evaluation process stops at this point. Award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers.

In the event that the government does not make an award pursuant to the paragraph above, the government reserves the right to award a contract to other than the lowest priced offer if that offeror is judged to have a technical or performance assessment rating of “Unacceptable”. In that event, the Technical Evaluation Team shall evaluate the next lowest priced offer until all criteria have an “Acceptable” rating.

The government intends to award a contract without discussions with respective offerors. The government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest.

The proposals will be evaluated on the basis of the evaluation factors listed below. The technical and past performance areas will be evaluated on an "acceptable" or "unacceptable" basis. Only those contractors determined to be technically acceptable will be evaluated on price. The following areas will be evaluated:

(a) Price - Total price reasonableness and completeness

(b) Technical - (acceptable/unacceptable)

(c) Past Performance - (acceptable/unacceptable)

A. PRICING

At a minimum, offerors shall fill out Pages 3 - 9 of the SF 1449 of this solicitation to be evaluated on price and to be considered for award. Initially offers shall be ranked according to price.

B. TECHNICAL ACCEPTABILITY

Part II, Technical Acceptability, will be evaluated on an acceptable or unacceptable basis. Offers shall be examined for their installation plan and -if necessary- the plan for modifying the Milnor Press to integrate with their new equipment.

a. If a contractor’s technical proposal is determined to be unacceptable, those offerors will be excluded from further consideration and will not be considered for award.

The Technical Evaluation Team will rate the technical proposals according to the table listed below:

Table A-1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

At a minimum, the following specific information shall be addressed in the offerors technical capability to demonstrate the offeror has a thorough understanding of the requirement:

1. To be deemed technically acceptable the proposed contractor shall demonstrate knowledge of the overall project and technical requirements to include full compliance with all elements and sections of the solicitation. The proposal must, at a minimum, meet specification and regulations stated in the solicitation, to include but not limited to commercial standards. Examples of demonstrating knowledge of project requirements include, but is not limited to: written narrative describing how the project will be accomplished, drawing outlining the contractor’s plan, other technical plans and specifications to complete the requirement, Milnor press modification plan (if necessary), and tunnel system design.

2. Provide a mobilization and installation schedule to identify how the offeror intends to meet the required installation timeframe. The schedule must be clearly outlined on an easily understandable document. To be considered minimally acceptable the schedule must not exceed 2 weeks (14 days) for overall installation to include maximum of 10 calendar days for mobilization.

C. PAST PERFORMANCE

The contracting officer shall seek relevant performance information based on (1) the references provided by the offeror, and (2) data independently obtained from other government and commercial sources. Relevant performance includes efforts involving the supply and installation of Batch Laundry Equipment that are similar or greater in scope, magnitude, and complexity than the effort described in this solicitation. Recent performance is contracts within the last three (3) years.

The Technical Evaluation Team will rate the past performance of contractors according to the table listed below:

Table A-2. Past Performance Evaluation Ratings

Rating Description Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown. (See note below.)

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “unacceptable.”

a. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment rating of “Acceptable” or Unacceptable” as defined above. The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the government to assess the offeror’s ability to perform the effort described in the solicitation, based on the offeror’s present and past performance. The government reserves the right to seek information on higher priced offerors if none of the lower priced offerors receive an “Acceptable” performance assessment rating. Past performance regarding predecessor companies, key personnel who have relevant experience, or sub-contractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement will be considered as highly as past performance information for the principal offeror.

b. In evaluating past performance, the government reserves the right to give greater consideration to information on those contracts deemed most relevant to the effort described in this solicitation.

c. Offerors are cautioned to submit sufficient information and in the format specified in the proposal preparation instructions to permit a meaningful assessment of past performance. Offerors may be asked to clarify certain aspects of their proposal or respond to adverse past performance information to which the offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond. Adverse past performance is defined as past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating on any evaluation element or any unfavorable comments received from sources without a formal rating system. Communication conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the contracting officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for proposal revision.

(End of Summary of Changes)