Post_RFP_Question_ _Answer_14_Jan_14.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted

Attached to
E-3 Mission Crew Training Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4890-13-R-0122
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

Post RFP Questions and Answers dated 14 Jan 14

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to E-3 Mission Crew Training, newest first.
File Type Posted
Corrective_Action-Award_Synopsis.doc DOC document
Amendment_0004.doc DOC document
Post_RFP_Industry_Q A_15_Jan_2014.pdf PDF
Amendment_0003.doc DOC document
E-3_MCT_PWS_v1.2_Changes_14_Jan_14.doc DOC document
Attachment_1_-_E-3_PWS_v1.2_dated_14_Jan_2014.doc DOC document
Amendment_0002.doc DOC document
Industry_Q A_2_Jan_2014.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_-_E3_Style_Guide_Version_1.0__2_Jan_2014.docx DOCX document
Attachment_6_-_Course_Listing.pdf PDF
Amendment_0001.doc DOC document
Attachment_1_-_E-3_PWS_v1.51_dated_2_Jan_2014.doc DOC document
E-3_MCT_Notice_of_Forthcoming_Amendment_and_Extension.doc DOC document
Attch_3-Slides.pptx PPTX presentation
E-3_Pre-Proposal_minutes.pdf PDF
Attch_1-List_of_Attendees.pdf PDF
Attch_2-Q A.docx DOCX document
Attachment_4_-_E-3_MCT_QASP_18_Oct_13.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-Final_Draft_DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_Final_E-3_MCT_PWS_as_of_20_Nov_2013.doc DOC document
E-3_MCT_Synopsis.doc DOC document
Attachment_3_-_E-3_MCT_CBA_and_WD.pdf PDF
E-3_RFP_as_of_22_Nov_13_-_FBO.doc DOC document
PreProposal_Conference_Notice_6_Nov_13.doc DOC document
Attachment_1_-_Final_E-3_MCT_PWS_as_of_5_Nov_2013.doc DOC document
Draft_RFP_as_of_6_Nov_13.doc DOC document
Industry_Q A_as_of_29_Oct_13.docx DOCX document
Draft_E-3_MCT_PWS_as_of_29_Oct_2013.doc DOC document
22_Oct_13_Industry_Q A.docx DOCX document
Final_Draft_DD254_-_FA4890-13-R-0122_10_Oct_13.pdf PDF
Interested_Parties.doc DOC document
Attachment_3_-_E-3_MCT_CBA_and_WD.pdf PDF
PreSolicitation_Notice.doc DOC document
DRAFT_RFP_as_of_17_Oct_13.doc DOC document
Attachment_1_-_E-3_MCT_PWS_16_Oct_13.doc DOC document
Industry_Q A_as_of_16_Oct_13.docx DOCX document
Request_for_Industry_Comment_E-3_MTC.docx DOCX document
Draft_E-3_Mission_Crew_Training_PWS_29_Aug_13.doc DOC document
Draft_E-3_Mission_Crew_Training_PWS_25_Jul_13.doc DOC document
Show all 39

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

14 Jan 2014

#Date - Question #Solicitation Ref #Offeror's QuestionAnswer
11/8/14PWS 4.9In the Amendment 0001 PWS, section 4.9, the government added qualifications or an Educational Technologist. This labor category does not show up anywhere in the CBA nor is it referenced anywhere else in the PWS.
Could the government direct us to which labor category in the CBA we should map this description to (i.e. Editor or Production Control Specialist). Or should we map this to a WD category? If a WD category is recommended, would the government please release a WD schedule?Instructor/Designers (CBA labels) accomplish the tasks of both the CWD I/SME and Education Technician. Educational Technologist/Education Technician are the same.

Amendment 0002 changes:

-FAR Clause 52.222-42 has been updated to reflect the corresponding rate for this classification of $27.51.

-PWS para 4.9 was updated to reference the associated scope of work tied to the position.

2 1/13/14 PWS Appendix D The updated PWS, Appendix D, Deliverables, lists a requirement for a Risk Management Plan, but the associated reference/directives in PWS para 4.8.6 does not exist. Is the Risk Management Plan required to be submitted with our proposal, and is there any specific PWS guidance for its development? Amendment 0002 change:

Appendix D was updated to removed the Risk Management Plan. The ISDMP already requires Risk Management per PWS para 4.8.1.1(5)

&"Arial,Bold"&22E-3 MCT Questions to and Answers from the Government 14 Jan 2014

&6&Z&F &8Page &P of &N &6updated: &D &T &4created: 11/27/13 10:45 AM

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .