D. AF813 B190.pdf

10/12/21, 2:09 PM AF FORM 813

1/3

REQUEST FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Report Control Symbol (RCS):

16-0061

INSTRUCTIONS: Section I to be completed by Proponent; Sections II and III to be completed by Environmental Planning Function. Continue on separate sheets as necessary. Reference appropriate item number(s).

SECTION I - PROPONENT INFORMATION

1. TO (Environmental Planning Function)

27 SOCES/CEIE

2. FROM (Proponent organization and functional address symbol) Air Force - 27 SOCES/CEN

2a. TELEPHONE NO.

575-904-4407

3. TITLE OF PROPOSED ACTION

Repair Doors, Sprinklers, Tile, Briefing Room, B190

4. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION (Identify decision to be made and need date)

1. What do you intend to accomplish and why is the action necessary?

- Renovate Building 190 per user's request and Wing approved project priority list.

- Renovation includes fixing deficient sprinkler heads to meet National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) 101 Life Safety Code, install smoke detectors, replace broken floor tiles throughout the building, replace worn carpet throughout the building, increase conference room size from 100 SF to 156 SF, replace some fluorescent lights, and repair broken magnetic closing system for fire doors.

- This building is currently the squadron operations building for the 318th Special Operations Squadron (SOS), who fly the U-28 airframe. The building and the equipment housed within are instrumental in supporting the flight operations.

2. What is currently being done to meet the need?

This building has been assigned a Fire Safety Deficiency (FSD) code III by Fire Safety qualified personnel due to the sprinklers being recessed too far into the ceiling.

3. Provide any additional details related to the Purpose and Need for Action.

In the case of a fire, the water flow from the sprinklers would be hampered because they are recessed too far into the ceiling, which would cause some of the water flow to be blocked. Additionally, without functioning magnets, the fire doors will not close when the fire alarm is triggered and will not serve their purpose of preventing the spreading of a fire. The lack of a functioning automatic door closing mechanism causes the building to not be up to fire code. Assigned FSD III. Ref: NFPA 101, para 7.2.1.8.2.

Need Date: 10/14/2021

5. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES (DOPAA) (Provide sufficient details for evaluation of the total action.)

1. What other alternatives have been considered (to include the no action alternative)?

1) Construct a new building

2) Move the user to a new building

2. What alternatives were eliminated from consideration and why?

1) Reconstruction of the entire building far exceeds the cost of renovating.

2) Re-locating the users to another building is not possible due to the limited available space on Cannon AFB.

3. Please provide a description of the construction action and timing when it will occur.

Construction work is projected to take place next calendar year, 2022.

4. Describe the project location. Attach map(s)/diagram(s) – make sure to include an overview map of where your requested project area is on the installation.

Map is attached.

5. Describe additional project requirements: 1) Construction and site preparation requirements (include approx. area of ground to be disturbed); 2) Does the project require a laydown yard or storage area? If so, describe the location and groundwork required.

One of the previously established and authorized laydown yards on the installation will be used for this project.

6. Describe additional project requirements: 3) Will soil boring/sampling/potholing occur during a design phase? If so, a separate dig permit will be required; 4) Detailed operational activities; 5) Equipment/material lists.

There will be no soil borings or digging associated with this project.

7. Provide any additional details related to the Description of the Proposed Action and Alternatives.

Map Attachments:

B190 map.png

6. PROPONENT APPROVAL (Name and Grade) Smith Blanca DOD - blanca.e.smith1

6a. SIGNATURE //Smith Blanca DOD - blanca.e.smith1 i:0e.t|fedvis|blanca.e.smith1//

6b. DATE 09/10/2021

SECTION II - PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEY (Check appropriate box and describe potential environmental effects including cumulative effects.) (+ = positive effect; 0 = no effect; - = adverse effect; U = unknown effect)

+ 0 - U

7. AIR INSTALLATION COMPATIBLE LAND USE/ZONE USE (Noise, accident potential, encroachment, etc.) X

8. AIR QUALITY (Emissions, Attainment status, state implementation plan, etc.) X

9. WATER RESOURCES (Drinking water, wastewater, quality, quantity, source, water features, etc.) X

10. SAFETY AND OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH (Asbestos/lead-based paint/radiation/chemical exposure, explosives safety quantity distance, bird/wildlife aircraft hazard, etc.)

X

11. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS/WASTE (Use/storage/generation, solid waste, toxic materials, etc.) X

12. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES (Wetlands/floodplains, threatened or endangered species, etc.) X

13. CULTURAL RESOURCES (Burial sites, archaeological, historical, etc.) X

14. GEOLOGY AND SOILS (Topography, minerals, geothermal, Installation Restoration Program, seismicity, etc.) X

15. SOCIOECONOMIC (Employment/population projections, school and local fiscal impacts, etc.) X https://intelshare.intelink.gov/sites/USAFNEPA/Attachments/1631307058698/B190%20map.png

2/3

16. OTHER (Potential impacts not addressed above, such as Host Nation considerations/concerns for non-US locations.)

SECTION III - ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DETERMINATION

17. PROPOSED ACTION QUALIFIES FOR CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION (CATEX) #A2.3.8. ; OR

PROPOSED ACTION DOES NOT QUALIFY FOR A CATEX; FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED.

18. REMARKS

A2.3.8. Performing interior and exterior construction within the 5-foot line of a building without changing the land use of the existing building.

All work proposed will be contained within the existing footprint of the building. No adverse evironmental impacts associated with this action have been identified at this time.

19. ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING FUNCTION CERTIFICATION (Name and Grade) Dunahee, Lindsay GS-13

19a. SIGNATURE //Dunahee Lindsay DOD - lindsay.r.dunahee i:0e.t|fedvis|lindsay.r.dunahee//

19b. DATE 10/11/2021

AF IMT 813, 199990901, V1 THIS FORM CONSOLIDATES AF FORMS 813 AND 814.

PREVIOUS EDITIONS OF BOTH FORMS ARE OBSOLETE.

3/3

CONTINUATION SHEET

Review Comments:

Other (09/27/2021 - Long Barbara DOD - barbara.e.long) Socioeconomics: No effect Justification: Socioeconomics are not impacted for the proposed project activities. Section 1508.14 of the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations states that “economic or social effects are not intended by themselves to require preparation of an environmental impact statement (1050.1F Desk Reference. (July 2015). Chapter 12, Socioeconomics, Environmental Justice, and Children's Environment Health and Safety Risks.

Contact: Barbara E. Long, PMAES, DAFC, Interdisciplinary Environmental Scientist, GS-12, Cultural Resources Program Manager, 575-904-6735

Cultural Resources (09/27/2021 - Long Barbara DOD - barbara.e.long) No effect Justification: There are no known cultural sites within the vicinity of the proposed project activities. Pursuant to NAGPRA 43 CFR § 10.2(g) (4), if a cultural site is inadvertently discovered, procedures as outlined in the aforementioned CFR must be implemented.

Contact: the Barbara E. Long, PMAES, Interdisciplinary Environmental Scientist: GS-12, Cultural Resources Program Manager 27 SOCES/CEIE, Cannon AFB and Melrose AFR, NM, Comm: 575-904-6735

Hazardous Materials/Waste (09/27/2021 - Lytle Brittney DOD - brittney.t.lytle) Hazardous Waste: No Effect Justification: For the work described, the generation of hazardous waste as defined by RCRA is not anticipated for this project. The Contractor will be responsible for disposal of all wastes generated as a result of this work effort as required by federal/state law.

Contact: Brittney Lytle, GS-11, Hazardous Waste Program Manager, 575-904-6734

Biological Resources (09/27/2021 - Dixon Charles DOD - charles.e.dixon2) No effect Justification: This action on existing equipment in existing structure should have no effect on wildlife or wildlife habitat.

Contact: Charles E. Dixon PhD, Natural Resources Specialist, 27 SOCES/CEIE, CAFB, NM, 575 904 6731

Air Quality (09/27/2021 - Jennings Sarah DOD - sarah.n.jennings) No effect Justification: The proposed action shall not negatively impact the air quality (AQ) at Cannon AFB. The CEIE AQ Program Manager must be notified prior to the start of the proposed action if there are plans to use, install, maintain, service, repair and/or dispose of any emission generating equipment to determine if permitting will be required. Personnel accomplishing this action shall use Best Management Practices and follow the 27 SOCES Environmental Specifications.

Contact: Air Quality PM, Sarah Nuss, 575-904-3233, Sarah.Nuss@us.af.mil.

Hazardous Materials/Waste (09/27/2021 - Madril Joaquin DOD - joaquin.r.madril) Solid Waste: No Effect Justification: There is no solid waste issues or concerns associated with the requirements of this AF Form 813. Recommend diversion of recyclable materials away from regional landfills. Report all waste diverted (Landfilled and recycled) from this project to Solid Waste Manager, 27 SOCES/CEIE, Joaquin Madril, 575-904-6745

Water Resources (09/27/2021 - Newton Sara DOD - sara.e.newton) No Effect Justification: Per EPA definition, there are no navigable waters in the proposed project area. Contractors are required to follow Best Management Practices and 27 SOCES Environmental Specs.

Contact: Water Quality PM, Sara Newton, 575-904-6735

AICUZ/Land Use (09/28/2021 - Diller Susanna DOD - susanna.l.diller) AICUZ: No effect Justification: Based on proposed scope of work, no additional AICUZ analysis is required.

Contact: Susanna Diller, Community Planner, GS-12, 27 SOCES/CENPL, Cannon AFB, NM, Comm: 575-904-5351, DSN: 640-5351

Bioenvironmental (09/28/2021 - Warrenfeltz Emily DOD - emily.r.warrenfeltz) Safety and Occupational Health: No Effect Justification: If project is completed by Active Duty or GS employees, please follow most current BE Occupational and Environmental Assessment for PPE recommendations. Please call BE for further PPE recommendations at 784-4063.

Contact: SSgt Warrenfeltz, NCOIC Environmental Health

AFCEC Restoration (09/28/2021 - Gierke Christipher DOD - christipher.n.gierke) No effect Justification: Based on review on Cannon AFB Restoration program map, there are no concerns for restoration.

Contact: Christipher Gierke, Remedial Project Manager AFCEC/CZOW 575-904-6744

Hazardous Materials/Waste (09/30/2021 - Granfield Lylya DOD - lylya.n.granfield) Hazardous Materials: No Effect Justification: All chemical products for these projects must be authorized as required by AFMAN 32-7002 prior to mobilization to Cannon AFB or MAFR. SDS's and HAZMAT Worksheet should be provided 10 working days prior to the start of on-installation activities.

Contact: Lylya Granfield, Hazardous Materials PM, 27 SOCES/CEIE 575-904-6739

Hazardous Materials/Waste (10/07/2021 - Carr Phillip DOD - phillip.a.carr) Asbestos: No Effect Justification: There are no known suspect materials associated with this project. New materials must be <1% asbestos containing material.

Contact: Phillip Carr, Asbestos Program Manager, 27 SOCES/CEOHS, CAFB, NM, 575-784-4368

Legal (10/08/2021 - Watson Michael DOD - michael.r.watson1) Legal review has been uploaded to the attachments tab.

Contact: Michael Watson, DAFC, 575-904-5053

Attachments:

NEPA 813 Legal Review - Repair Doors, Sprinklers, Tile, Briefing Room, B190.pdf https://intelshare.intelink.gov/sites/USAFNEPA/Attachments/1631307058698/NEPA%20813%20Legal%20Review%20-%20Repair%20Doors,%20Sprinklers,%20Tile,%20Briefing%20Room,%20B190.pdf