Attachment_4_-_PPQ_.pdf

For Official Use Only

When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

52.212-2 Attachment: Past Performance Questionnaire

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 10

The 337 Air Control Squadron of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command is in the process of competitively selecting a source for a Contracted Training Flight Services (CTFS) program. The CTFS program forms an integral part of the Undergraduate Air Battle Manager Training (UABMT) program. The services are used to provide training aids for controllers and for the student to conduct training flights in order to gain their wings upon graduation.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 14 December 2016. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out electronically and e-mailed to amber.maestri.2@us.af.mil and britney.petrina.1@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official Source Selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

Signature

1 Atch

Past Performance Questionnaire http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:amber.maestri.2@us.af.mil mailto:britney.petrina.1@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 10

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Description of work performed:

J. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

K. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Predecessor Company

☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

L. Initial Contract Cost:

M. Current/Final Contract Cost:

N. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 10

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone number / fax number / e-mail address:

D. Respondent’s position (e.g., Program Manager, PCO/ACO, etc.):

E. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

F. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the questions below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by checking the appropriate box under each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the

Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 10

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last five (5) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

A. Technical Performance

E V S M U N/A

T1. How well did the contractor provide aviation instruction demonstrating the interaction between general aviation aircraft pilots and non-experienced students during pre-flight, flight, and post-flight phases?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

T2. How well did the contractor provide general aviation instruction to non-experienced students?

T3. How well did the contractor provide aviation instruction demonstrating safety awareness by emphasizing emergency procedures, airmanship principles, professionalism, and judgement?

T4. How well did the contractor provide mission/flight planning instruction and all other related pre-flight activities?

T5. How well did the contractor provide basic aircraft handling and pilotage instruction to non-experienced students?

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 10

T6. How well did the contractor execute tactical intercepts, tactical formations, and mutual support philosophies?

T7. How well did the contractor perform tactical air-to-air and air-to-surface mission planning, briefing, mission execution, and debriefing requirements?

T8. How well did the contractor understand and execute the intercept phases of an air-to-air mission from the air weapons officer/weapons director perspective?

T9. How well did the contractor execute up to 2v3 non-maneuvering/maneuvering launch and decide and launch and leave live mission using general aviation aircraft?

T10. How well did the contractor execute the application of positive identification (PID) and collateral damage estimation (CDE) ROE constraints in the execution of live, simulated air-to-surface mission execution?

For Official Use Only Page 6 of 10

B. Program Management

P1. How well did the contractor provide experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements?

P2. How well did the contractor demonstrate the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period?

P3. How well did the contractor delegate authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements?

P4. How well did the contractor participate in solving significant local problems?

P5. How well did the contractor respond to contract changes?

For Official Use Only Page 7 of 10

P6. How well did the contractor provide adequate project supervision?

P7. How well did the contractor cooperate with government personnel after award?

P8. How well did the contractor display initiative to solve problems?

C. Quality Control

Q1. How well did the contractor follow an approved quality control plan?

Q2. How well did the contractor provide effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements?

Q3. How well did the contractor correct deficiencies in timely manner pursuant to their quality control procedures?

For Official Use Only Page 8 of 10

Q4. How well did the contractor provide timely resolution of contract discrepancies?

Q5. How well did the contractor identify problems as they occurred?

Q6. How well did the contractor suggest alternative approaches to problems?

D. Additional Information

1. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

2. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

For Official Use Only Page 9 of 10

3. Government Contracts Only: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes

☐ No

4. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes

☐ No

E. Narrative Summary

1. What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

2. What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?

3. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

4. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

For Official Use Only Page 10 of 10

F. GENERAL COMMENT (Choose one of the following and explain your choice in the remarks)

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I

[ click and select an item ] award to him today given that I had a choice.

REMARKS:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

Mailing Address:

325 CONS LGCBA

Attn: Amber Maestri or Britney Petrina

501 Airey Ave, Suite 5

Tyndall AFB, FL 32403

FAX to: 850-283-8491

E-Mail to: amber.maestri.2@us.af.mil or britney.petrina.1@us.af.mil http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:amber.maestri.2@us.af.mil mailto:britney.petrina.1@us.af.mil