Attachment 36 - Relevancy Matrix Amended.pdf
PDF 187 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Civil Engineering (CE) Base Operation Support (BOS), MacDill AFB, FL Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA481423R0001
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Civil Engineering (CE) Base Operation Support (BOS), MacDill AFB, FL has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment No. 36 Sol No. FA4814-R-0001
Past Performance Relevancy Matrix
1. Engineering Maintenance Operations Experience
Very Relevant To be considered very relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 4 or more of the 5 criteria below. Program dollar value of at least $15M, annually.
Relevant To be considered relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 3 out of the 5 criteria below. Program dollar value of at least $12M.
Somewhat Relevant To be considered somewhat relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 2 out of the 5 criteria below.
Program dollar value of at least $10M.
Not Relevant To be considered not relevant, only 1 Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated of the 5 criteria below.
Higher relevancy ratings may be assigned for projects containing the following criteria:
A. Experience providing Operations & Maintenance for an installation with at least 150 buildings.
B. Experience maintaining a military runway of at least 10,000 feet with Airfield lighting.
C. Experience maintaining a high-voltage electrical grid with at least 100 transformers, 65 switchgears, 15 pole mounted transformers and multiple primary feeders.
D. Experience providing maintenance on central utility plants supporting facilities with over 750K square feet.
E. Experience providing a preventative maintenance program on a campus/installation with 3,000, or more, pieces of equipment.
2. Engineering Experience
Very Relevant To be considered very relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 4 or more of the 5 criteria below.
Relevant To be considered relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 3 out of the 5 criteria below.
Somewhat Relevant To be considered somewhat relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 2 out of the 5 criteria below.
Not Relevant To be considered not relevant, only 1 Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated of the 5 criteria below.
Higher relevancy ratings may be assigned for projects containing the following criteria:
A. Experience providing Engineering and Design Support for Military Installations with over
$20M annually in design work.
B. Experience providing Operational Engineering Support for a Military Installation with a least
150 buildings.
C. Programming Support for a Military Installation with at least 150 buildings.
D. Experience providing Construction Management Support with annual program over $10M.
E. Experience providing Planning Support for a Military Installation with at least 150 buildings.
Attachment No. 36 Sol No. FA4814-R-0001
Past Performance Relevancy Matrix
3. Environmental Experience/Real Property
Very Relevant To be considered very relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 4 or more of the 5 criteria below.
Relevant To be considered relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 3 out of the 5 criteria below.
Somewhat Relevant To be considered somewhat relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 2 out of the 5 criteria below.
Not Relevant To be considered not relevant, only 1 Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated of the 5 criteria below.
Higher relevancy ratings may be assigned for projects containing the following criteria:
A. Experience completing Compliance submittals/filing for a Military Installation with over 150 buildings.
B. Experience completing Real Property records for a Military Installation with over 1500 facilities.
C. Experience completing Cultural Resources Support for a Military Installation.
D. Experience completing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) / Environmental Impact
Analysis Process (EIAP) Support for a Military Installation.
F. Experience completing Environmental Management System Support for a Military Installation.
4. Emergency Management Experience
Very Relevant To be considered very relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 4 or more of the 5 criteria below.
Relevant To be considered relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 3 out of the 5 criteria below.
Somewhat Relevant To be considered somewhat relevant, Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated in 2 out of the 5 criteria below.
Not Relevant To be considered not relevant, only 1 Past Performance (PP) experience is demonstrated of the 5 criteria below.
Higher relevancy ratings may be assigned for projects containing the following criteria:
A. Experience providing Installation Emergency Management (EM) Support for a Military
Installation with at least 5 Mission partners and one primary mission.
B. Experience providing Emergency Operations Center (EOC) Support for a Military Installation.
C. Experience providing Emergency Response Support to an Incident Command System (ICS)
Type 1, 2, or 3 incident or graduate of ICS 300/400 D. Experience providing EM Training Support for a Military Installation meeting AFI requirements.
E. Experience completing Unit Deployment Manager duties for a Military squadron.
Notes: The government will consider past performance from outside agencies that meet the criteria outlined in this Relevancy Matrix.
The meaning of "installation" and "squadron" as used herein includes any equivalent military or governmental organization.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .