DPM_Extension_Amendment_2.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of the amendment is to revise the solicitation due date. Reference ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1 to submission details.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 22-Jun-2017

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X FA4814-17-R-0006

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

01-May-2017

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

22-Jun-2017

CODE

6TH CONTRACTING SQ

2610 PINK FLAMINGO AVE

MACDILL AFB FL 33621-5119

FA4814 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL: (813) 828-7483 ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil

FA4814-17-R-0006

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 22-Jun-2017 01:00 PM to 07-Jul-2017 01:00 PM.

The following have been modified:

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

ADDENDUM TO 52.212-1

The following additions/changes are made to FAR provision 52.212-1, which is incorporated by reference.

Information found in this addendum supersede FAR 52.212-1.

1. Instructions to Offerors-Commercial Items.

a. The Government reserves the right to revise or amend the specifications, drawings or the solicitation prior to the this Request For Proposal (RFP) closing time. Such revisions or amendments, will be communicated by amendments to this RFP. If such amendments require material changes in quantities or prices, the RFP closing date may be postponed by enough days to enable offerors to revise their proposals. In such cases, the amendment will include an announcement of the new RFP closing date and time. Amendments will be posted on the Internet with the solicitation documents without notice. Offerors are responsible for accessing all amendments prior to proposal submission at www.fbo.gov. All solicitation amendments must be acknowledged and turned in with offer.

2. General Information.

a. Solicitation number: FA4814-17-R-0006

b. Requests for clarification. Address any questions or concerns you have to the CO or CA. Written requests for clarification may be sent by e-mail to wanda.noel@us.af.mil or ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil or by mail to the address located in block 9 of the standard form 1449. No phone calls will be taken. All requests for clarification/questions are due no later than 28 June 2017 at 12:00 PM Eastern Standard Time.

c. Receipt of offerors. Offers are due no later than 7 July 2017 at 1:00 PM Eastern Standard Time to the 6th Contracting Squadron, 2610 Pink Flamingo Avenue, Building 147, MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5119 (2nd Floor, Rm. 211). No faxed or emailed offers will be accepted. The offeror is solely responsible to make sure their offers are received by the deadline. HANDCARRIED PROPOSALS MUST BE RECEIVED AND DATE STAMPED BY A MEMBER OF THE 6th CONTRACTING SQUADRON NO LATER THAN 2:00pm local time, 6 July 2017. Late proposals will be processed in accordance with FAR 52.212-1 (f) “Late submission, modifications, revisions and withdrawals of offers.”

d. “Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.”

e. Points of Contact – The Contracting Officer (CO) and Contract Administrator (CA) are the sole points of contact for this acquisition. The CA for this solicitation is Mrs. Wanda Noel and she can be reached by phone at

(813) 828-7465 or by email at wand.noel@us.af.mil. The CO for this solicitation is Mr. Ramon Jimenez and he can be reached by phone at (813) 828-7483 or by email at ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil.

f. Period for acceptance of offers. The offeror agrees to hold the prices in its offer firm for 120 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers, unless another time period is specified in an addendum to the solicitation.

g. N O T I C E: OFFERORS ARE CAUTIONED THAT MACDILL AFB HAS STRINGENT VISITOR

CONTROL PROCEDURES REQUIRING INDIVIDUALS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE

INSTALLATION TO OBTAIN A VISITOR PASS AND BE CLEARED BY THE GOVERNMENT

POINT OF CONTACT TO BE VISITED PRIOR TO ENTRANCE. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE

POINT OF CONTACT MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE TO CLEAR OFFERORS FOR ENTRANCE

WHICH MAY PROHIBIT SUBMISSION OF HANDCARRIED OFFERS; CONSEQUENTLY,

OFFERORS ELECTING TO HANDCARRY THEIR PROPOSALS FOR SUBMITTAL JUST PRIOR

TO THE RFP CLOSING TIME DO SO AT THEIR OWN RISK.

3. Proposal Preparation Instructions.

a. To assure timely and equitable evaluation of proposals, offerors must follow the instructions contained herein. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement will result in an offer being ineligible for award. The offeror shall prepare submissions as set forth in the organizational table below. The titles and contents of the volumes are defined in the below table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies shown below.

VOLUME VOLUME CONTENTS

COPIES PAGE LIMIT

I Contract Documentation, Cost/Price

Original Plus three (3) Copies & 1 Digital Copy on a Compact Disk

No Limit

II Technical Approach Original Plus three (3) Copies & 1 Digital Copy on a Compact Disk

III Past Performance

Original Plus three (3) Copies & 1 Digital Copy on a Compact Disk

b. Page Limitations – Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read nor considered in the evaluation of the proposal and (for paper copies) will be returned to the offeror as soon as practicable. Each page shall be counted except the following: cover page, table of contents, tabs, and glossaries.

c. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms – Each volume shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with an explanation for each. Glossaries do not count against the page limitations for their respective volumes

d. Page Size and Format – A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be 8.5 X 11 inches, not including foldouts. Pages shall be single spaced and text size shall be no less than 12 point. Use at least 1 inch margins on top and bottom and ¾ inch side margins. Pages shall be numbered sequentially by volume. Legible tables, charts, graphs, and figures shall be used wherever practical to depict organizations, systems and layout, implementation schedules, plans, etc. These displays shall be uncomplicated, legible and shall not exceed 11 X 17 inches in size. Foldout pages shall fold entirely within the volume and count as a single page. Foldout pages shall not be used for text. These limitations shall apply to both electronic and hard copy submissions.

e. Binding and Labeling – Each volume should be separately bound in a three-ring loose leaf binder. A cover sheet should be bound in each book, clearly marked as to volume number, title, copy number, solicitation identification and the offeror’s name. 1.2.7 Electronic Offers – The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. For electronic copies, indicate on each CD the volume number and title.

Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including subfactors, exhibits, annexes, and attachments if any. Electronic copies shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft Office.

f. Electronic Offers – The content and page size of electronic copies must be identical to the hard copies. For electronic copies, indicate on each CD the volume number and title. Use separate files to permit rapid location of all portions, including subfactors, exhibits, annexes, and attachments if any. Electronic copies shall be submitted in a format readable by Microsoft Office. As part of the provided digital copy (compact disk), offerors must provide the completed Excel document (not a scanned or copied) for evaluation.

4. General Format and Content

The offeror shall submit the following volumes of material. A complete proposal consists of the following volumes:

a. Volume I – SF 1449, Representations and Certifications, and any parts of the request for proposal with fill-in blanks and solicitation attachments as applicable, i.e excel spreadsheets at Attachment 2, Bid Schedule.

All cost or pricing information shall be addressed only in Volume I. As part of Volume I, offerors are required to complete attachment #2, Bid Schedule. As part of the provided digital copy (compact disk), offerors must provide the completed Excel document (not a scanned or copied) for evaluation. Insert proposed unit prices for each Contract Line Item (CLINs 0001AA-0033AC). The Excel template has preloaded formuals to calculate totals but offerors are individually responsible for ensuring pricing is accurate. Failure to provide a complete bid schedule will result in that offeror being determined non-responsive and remove them from consideration.

Complete the Representations and Certifications IAW 52.212-3 and/or SAM website (https://www.sam.gov/portal/SAM/). Fill in blanks, when appropriate in any sections of the request for proposal.

b. Volume II – As part of an offerors Technical Approach, each Subfactor must be individually responded to.

Responses must demonstrate a clear understanding of the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and provide specific evidence of compliance. Failure to address all Subfactors will result in that offeror being determined non-responsive and remove them from consideration. The Government shall evaluate an offerors Technical Approach using the ratings idenified in Table 1.

Table 1 – TECHNICAL APPROACH RATINGS Rating

Description

ACCEPTABLE

Offeror’s has provided clear evidence that they meet the requirements of SubFactors 1-4 and the Government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

UNACCEPTABLE

Offeror’s has not provided clear evidence that they meet the requirements of SubFactors 1-4 and the Government does not have an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

c. Volume III – Past Performance.

(i) Offerors must provide (as part of Volume III) a list (references) of at least three (3) of their the most recent and relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers. If more than 3 references are provided, only the 3 determined to be most relevant will be considered. Offerors whom do not provide references due to a lack of relevant past performance must comply with section 4(C)(ii)(d) below. Offerors whom do not provide 3 past performance references and fail to comply with section 4(C)(ii)(d) below, will result in that offeror being determined “non-responsive” and remove them from consideration.

Note: Offerors whom provide references are encouraged to still comply with section 4(C)(ii)(d). Should the Government only have references to evaluate, the offeror runs the risk of having references rated as “Not Recent” or “Not Relevant” which may lead to not meeting requirements stipulated in the above paragraph.

Furnish the following information for each reference provided:

- Company/Division name

- Product/Service

- Contracting Agency/Customer

- Contract Number

- Contract Dollar Value

- Period of Performance

- Verified, up-to-date name, address, FAX & telephone number of the contracting officer

- Comments regarding compliance with contract terms and conditions

- Comments regarding any known performance deemed unacceptable to the customer, or not in accordance with the contract terms and conditions.

(ii) The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror’s performance deemed relevant to the requirements of the PWS. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel (if applicable) who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such information is relevant to this acquisition. The Government shall evaluate an offerors Past Performance using the ratings idenified in Table 2.

Table 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE RATINGS

ACCEPTABLE

Offeror has provided the minimum number of past performance references (4) and they all have been rated as being recent and relevent. Offeror lacks relevant past performance but has complied with section vi(a)-(f). No negative findings from other sources available to the Government were found.

UNACCEPTABLE

Offeror has not provided the minimum number of past performance references (4) and/or at lease one was not rated as being recent and/or relevent.

Offeror lacks relevant past performance and failed to comply with section vi(a)-(f). Negative findings from other sources available to the Government were found.

(iii) The Government will use the following recency and relevancy definitions when assessing recent and relevant contracts:

(a) Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past five (5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will not be evaluated.

(b) Relevancy Assessment: As described in Table 3 below, the Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine how closely the provided products/services performed under those contracts relate to the Performance Work Statement (to include magnitude of effort) provided and assign a rating of “Relevant” or “Not Relevant”. Magnitude of effort is defined by dollar value. Failure to provide references of more than $500,000 per year will not be considered within the magnitude of effort and will be rated as “Not Relevant”. A relevancy determination of the offeror’s past performance will be made based upon the aforementioned considerations, including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s). In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. Past performance information deemed “Not Relevant” will result in an “unacceptable” past performance rating.

Table 3 – RELEVANCY ASSESSMENTS

RELEVANT

Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities described in the PWS.

NOT RELEVANT

Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities described in the PWS.

(iv) In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offeror’s Past Performance volume and information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), or other databases; interviews with Program Managers,Contracting Officers and Fee Determining Officials; the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), and commercial sources.

(v) Assigning Ratings. Past performance submissions determined to be neither recent and/or relevant, will result in an offeror receiving a performance confidence assessment of “Unacceptable”. Negative past performance found using sources described in section iv above, may result in a past performance confidence rating of “Unacceptable”.

(vi) In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Offerors without a record (minimum of 4 references) of relevant past performance will be required to affirmatively demonstrate its responsibility by providing supporting documentation. Supporting documentation must provide evidence that the offeror:

(a) Has adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them;

(b) Is able to comply with the required or proposed delivery or performance schedule, taking into consideration all existing commercial and governmental business commitments;

(c) Has a satisfactory performance record;

(d) Has a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics;

(e) Has the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them (including, as appropriate, such elements as production control procedures, property control systems, quality assurance measures, and safety programs applicable to materials to be produced or services to be performed by the prospective contractor and subcontractors);

(f) Is otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable laws and regulations.

(vii) Should supporting documentation be evaluated to reflect an offeror lacks certain elements of responsibility the contracting officer shall –

(a) Withhold contract award (see 19.602-3); and

(b) Refer the matter to the cognizant SBA Government Contracting Area Office (Area Office) serving the area in which the headquarters of the offeror is located, in accordance with agency procedures.

(c) Within 15 business days (or a longer period agreed to by the SBA and the contracting agency) after receiving a notice that a small business concern lacks certain elements of responsibility, the SBA Area Office will notify the concern and the contracting officer that the COC is denied or is being issued. Failure to be issued a COC will result in that offeror being determined ineligible for award.

(End of Provision Addendum)

(End of Summary of Changes)