FA480925Q0129 Vendor Questions and Answers.pdf
PDF 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- 8V92TA Detroit Diesel Engine
- Solicitation number
- FA480925Q0129
About this file
This document is a Vendor Questions and Answers file (FA480925Q0129) for a potential engine procurement or exchange opportunity involving Seymour Johnson Air Force Base (SJAFB). The document contains three key questions and answers from a potential vendor regarding engine rebuilding and configuration. Key details include:
The vendor inquired about providing an old engine for rebuilding, to which SJAFB directly stated they cannot provide the current engine for refurbishment. The vendor also asked about remanufacturing the existing engine, which SJAFB explicitly rejected. Additionally, the vendor sought confirmation about an engine configuration through photos, and SJAFB confirmed that the engine in the vendor's photos was not the correct configuration. The document suggests SJAFB is seeking a specific type of engine replacement or exchange, though the exact technical specifications are not detailed in this Q&A document.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
FA480925Q0129 Vendor Questions and Answers.
Q1. Those engines are to be re-built they are not produced anymore. Are you able to provide the old engine so it can be re-furbished, and you are just looking for pricing on rebuilt?
A1. SJAFB can’t provide the current engine to be rebuilt/refurbished
Q2. Would the government be interested in remanufacturing their current engine instead of receiving an exchange engine?
A2. SJAFB is not interested in refurbishing the current engine
Q3. NOTE: (The government received specific photos from vendor and will not be disseminating said specific photos)
Trying to confirm the engine in the photos is the configuration you are looking for. Is this the configuration of the engine you are looking for?
A3. The engine in the photo is not the correct configuration.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .