Attch_4-Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

For Official Use Only Page 1 of 15

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

7TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON (AFGSC)

DYESS AIR FORCE BASE TEXAS

1. The 7th Contracting Squadron is conducting a proposal evaluation for subject solicitation at Dyess AFB, TX.

Under the solicitation, the Air Force will perform a tradeoff evaluation. The contractor listed in Section A of the attached questionnaire has identified your office as a source to evaluate the contractor’s past performance and it also authorizes release of this information to our office.

2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

3. The individual most knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall condition of performance rendered should complete the survey. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge with the judgment of others in their organization.

4. Please complete the questionnaire as thoroughly as possible and providing comments wherever applicable.

For any rating of M or U, we request you provide an explanatory narrative and attach to your response. The narratives need not be lengthy, but should be detailed and descriptive. Use separate evaluation forms for each contract/order being evaluated.

5. Your time and effort in providing this information is greatly appreciated. The requested information is critical to our evaluation. Please complete and return the completed package as quickly as possible but not later than 2:00 PM CST 25 April 2017. You shall email a filled in copy to 7conslgca@gmail.com, stephen.aguerocheek@us.af.mil, or merry.sargentgreen@us.af.mil. or mail it to the following address:

7th Contracting Squadron Attn: Mrs. Merry Sargent-Green/A1C Stephen Aguero-Cheek 381 Third Street Dyess AFB TX 79607

6. If you have any questions, please call A1C Stephen Aguero-Cheek at (325) 696-2246 or Mrs. Merry Sargent- Green at (325) 696-2285. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.

MERRY SARGENT-GREEN, Civ, DAF Director of Business Operations Contracting Officer

Attachement :

Past Performance Questionnaire mailto:7conslgca@gmail.com mailto:stephen.aguerocheek@us.af.mil mailto:merry.sargentgreen@us.af.mil

For Official Use Only Page 2 of 15

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):

Beginning Date _________ through ____________

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

For Official Use Only Page 3 of 15

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided.

Attach additional pages if more space is needed. When responding to the descriptive statements, select the letter, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

G GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

E G S M U N/A

EXCEPTIONAL GOOD SATISFACTORY MARGINAL UNSATISFACTORY NOT

APPLICABLE

For Official Use Only Page 4 of 15

I. QUALITY CONTROL: E G S M U N/A

1. Contractor provided effective quality control and inspection procedures that resulted in a quality-finished project.

Please provide COMMENTS:

2. Contractor developed and submitted realistic progress schedule(s).

3. Contractor provided well researched and clearly identified submittals that matched contract requirements.

4. Contractor completed all work with good workmanship and in conformance with the specifications, resulting in minor, if any, punch list items.

II. TIMELY PERFORMANCE: E G S M U N/A

1. Contractor met established project schedules to complete the project on time, as scheduled.

2. Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a CURE NOTICE or a SHOW CAUSE LETTER (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances on a separate sheet of paper and identify if Liquidated Damages were assessed)

3. Contractor provided timely cost/price/design proposals.

4. Contractor submitted the interim progress reports as required in a timely manner.

For Official Use Only Page 5 of 15

5. Contractor provided on-time submittals as required.

6. Contractor provided payrolls for both their firm and their subcontractors’ employees as required and scheduled.

7. Contractor provided timely resolution of all punch list items.

III. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS: E G S M U N/A

1. Contractor provided experienced/qualified managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

2. Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.

3. Contractor hired, maintained, and replaced as necessary, qualified personnel and subcontractors/suppliers.

4. Contractor ensured the site manager had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during project performance to keep the project on schedule.

5. Contractor ensured the site manager was consistently present on site when work was performed.

For Official Use Only Page 6 of 15

6. Contractor provided timely and satisfactory response to warranty issues after project completion.

7. Contractor paid employees/subcontractors/suppliers as required.

8. The contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings and maintained communication to assure satisfactory resolution.

IV. PRICING: E G S M U N/A

1. The contractor submitted proposals that accurately represent the work required.

2. The contractor’s supporting price/cost information for modifications was accurate, complete and reasonable (not over inflated or under estimated).

3. How would you rate the contractor’s overall Pricing performance.

V. MANAGEMENT/SUPERINTENDENCE: E G S M U N/A

1. Site Manager ensured compliance to contact requirements and safety regulations.

For Official Use Only Page 7 of 15

2. Site Manager acted promptly to resolve problems and ensure work quality.

3. Site Manager had sufficient authority to make decisions or take actions during project performance.

4. Site Manager consistently present on site when work was performed.

VI. COMPLIANCE WITH LABOR STANDARDS: E G S M U N/A

1. Submitted payrolls in a timely manner.

2. Payrolls were complete and correct.

3. Compliance with labor laws and regulations with specific attention to the Davis-Bacon Act.

VII. COMPLIANCE WITH SAFETY STANDARDS: E G S M U N/A

1. Adequacy of Safety Plan.

2. Implementation of Safety Plan.

For Official Use Only Page 8 of 15

VIII. GENERAL PERFORMANCE:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON SUCCESSFULLY MANAGING MULTIPLE AIRFIELD AND STREET PROJECTS/TASK ORDERS.

Please rate the contractor in this area. E G S M U N/A

Comments:

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE ON PROJECTS/TASK ORDERS. (EXAMPLE: WERE ANY NOT ACCEPTED DUE TO THE

QUALITY OF WORKMANSHIP?)

(If yes, please briefly explain circumstances in comments section below)

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY COMPLIED WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS.

For Official Use Only Page 9 of 15

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY ADHERED TO BASE STANDARDS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES TO INCLUDE AIRFIELD

AND STREET. (EXAMPLE: SITE CLEANED UP)

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY CONDUCTED AND DOCUMENTED DAILY SELF-INSPECTIONS.

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON FOD (FOREIGN OBJECT DAMAGE) AND THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSE

TO FOD ISSUES.

(If yes, please briefly explain circumstances in comments section below)

For Official Use Only Page 10 of 15

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY COMPLIED WITH SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS. (EXAMPLE: DOES THE CONTRACTOR

INSTALL/USE THE MATERIALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL OR DO THEY SUBSTITUTE "OTHER MATERIALS" NOT APPROVED BY

THE GOVERNMENT WITHOUT NOTICE?)

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY COMPLIED WITH PHASING REQUIREMENTS AND HOW WELL THEY TOOK BASE

OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS INTO CONSIDERATION.

For Official Use Only Page 11 of 15

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON "MAJOR DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS" AND HOW THEY ROUTINELY IMPLEMENT/NEGOTIATE

CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS.

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON THE VOLUME OF CHANGE ORDERS AND IF THEY ARE ROUTINELY REQUESTED/INITIATED BY THE

CONTRACTOR.

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW QUICKLY THEY RESPONDED TO WARRANTY REPAIR CLAIMS.

For Official Use Only Page 12 of 15

PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW WELL THEY WOULD ROUTINELY FIND MORE COST/EFFECTIVE CONSTRUCTION METHODS

(EXAMPLE: LADDERS INSTEAD OF SCAFFOLDING, FRONT END LOADER INSTEAD OF BULLDOZER, ETC.) DURING NEGOTIATIONS.

PLEASE RATE WHEN THE GOVERNMENT CLAIMS SALVAGE OF MATERIALS TO BE REMOVED, PLEASE RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON HOW

THEY TAKE CARE TO REMOVE THEM IN AN UNDAMAGED CONDITION AND PROMPTLY DELIVER THEM TO THE GOVERNMENT.

For Official Use Only Page 13 of 15

PLEASE RATE HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE IN REGARDS TO COMPLIANCE WITH BASE, LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL RULES AND REGULATIONS.

PLEASE RATE HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE CONTRACTOR ON WORKING IN AN ACTIVE AIRFIELD AREA WITH LITTLE OR NO DISRUPTION TO

OPERATIONS

PLEASE RATE HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE CONTRACTOR TO RESOLVE PROBLEMS AND TO IDENTIFY/MANAGE PROGRAM RISK?

For Official Use Only Page 14 of 15

PLEASE RATE HOW EFFECTIVE THE CONTRACTOR WAS IN CLEARLY DEMONSTRATING MANAGEMENT ACTIONS EMPLOYED IN

OVERCOMING PROBLEMS AND THE EFFECTS OF THOSE ACTIONS IN TERMS OF IMPROVEMENTS ACHIEVED OR PROBLEMS RECTIFIED

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

For Official Use Only Page 15 of 15

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

7conslgca@gmail.com, stephen.aguerocheek@us.af.mil, or merry.sargentgreen@us.af.mil. or mail it to the following address:

7th Contracting Squadron Attn: Mrs. Merry Sargent-Green/A1C Stephen Aguero-Cheek 381 Third Street Dyess AFB TX 79607

If you have any questions, please call A1C Stephen Aguero-Cheek at (325) 696-2246 or Mrs. Merry Sargent Green at (325) 696-2285. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.

mailto:7conslgca@gmail.com mailto:stephen.aguerocheek@us.af.mil mailto:merry.sargentgreen@us.af.mil