Atth 2 -PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
Fire Protection Services at Cavalier Air Force Station Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA4659-12-R-0008
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command

About this file

Attachment 2 questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Fire Protection Services at Cavalier Air Force Station, newest first.
File Type Posted
SF30ammend2.doc DOC document
sitevisitattendance.pdf PDF
MFRquestions.docx DOCX document
RFP Solicitation Cover Letter Fire Pro.doc DOC document
SF30ammend1.doc DOC document
Atth 1 - PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT —
Atth 5 - Collective Bargaining agreement.pdf PDF
Atth 4 QASP.docx DOCX document
RFP Solicitation Cover Letter Fire Pro.doc DOC document
Atth 3 -FINANCIAL INSTITUTION REFERENCE SHEET.docx DOCX document
RFP.doc DOC document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA4659-12-R-0008

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When Filled In This Document Is Source Selection Sensitive IAW FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation

TO:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Fire Protection contract at Cavalier Air Force Station, ND.

Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, contact Daniel Cary at 701-747-5301, Email: daniel.cary@us.af.mil and myself at 701-747-5287 or by email: queen.mccartney@us.af.mil.

QUEEN E. MCCARTNEY Contracting Officer

1 Atch Past and Present Performance Questionnaire

PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

A. GENERAL INFORMATION: Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate:

Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Telephone Number: ____________________ Address: __________________________ Fax Number: _________________________ __________________________ Point of Contact: ______________________

__________________________
__________________________

Project Title and Brief Description of Work: _____________________________________*

Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ___________________ Dollar Amount: ________*

Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror: ______________________* Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel.

* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:

Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ____________________________

Address: _____________________Telephone Number: ___________________ _____________________________Fax Number:_____________________
_____________________________Email Address: _____________________
C. FAX COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO:SSgt Daniel Cary
Fax: 701-747-4215
Phone: 701-747-5301

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, and N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT NUMBER: _______________

Note: Include this information on each page of the questionnaire form to ensure there is no mix up in information among contracts surveyed for respective primes/subs, etc.

Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.

The contractor:
E
G
S
M
U
N
1.
Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3.
Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4.
Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5.
Followed approved quality control plan.
6.
Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7.
Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
8.
Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9.
Identified problems as they occurred.
10.
Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12.
Developed realistic progress schedules.
13.
Met established project schedules.
14.
Provided timely resolution of warranty defects.
15.
Was responsive to contract changes.
16.
Provided adequate project supervision.
17.
Obtained consent of surety for increases in bonding as work-in-progress increased.
18.
Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
19.
Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
20.
Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
21.
How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
22.
Subcontractors and suppliers were responsible, professional, and completed tasks in a timely manner with quality results.
23.
Demonstrated ability to coordinate and manage subcontractors and suppliers.
24.
Handled submittals and paperwork in a professional manner.
25.
Materials and equipment met or exceeded specified requirements.
26.
Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”

YES/NO

27.
Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”

YES/NO

28.
Is the contractor rated in CPARS?
YES/NO

Remarks:___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Attachment 2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .