Questions and Answers.pdf
PDF 98 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Roof & Gutter Repair Installation Fitness Center
- Solicitation number
- FA465424R0016
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) related to Solicitation FA465424R0016 for Roof & Gutter Repair Installation at the Fitness Center.
The key details are:
- The solicitation is for repairing/replacing the roofing and guttering on the Installation Fitness Center, including demolition, protection, hauling, and reinstallation.
- The anticipated range of magnitude is between $250,000 and $500,000.
- A site visit is scheduled for May 21, 2024, and questions are due by May 31, 2024, with answers posted by June 4, 2024.
- The Q&A clarifies that the past performance projects can be the same for both the narrative and supporting documentation, and that both hot and cold adhesive can be used. It also states that the qualified Superintendent can serve as the Site Safety and Health Officer and Quality Control Manager.
- There will be no extension to the solicitation due date, as the amendment answers do not substantially alter the requirements.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
GRISSOM ARB
6/4/24
Solicita�on FA465424R0016 Roof & Guter Repair Installa�on Fitness Center:
Ques�ons & Answers
Q: In M-3.1.1 Recency, it states, “ To be determined recent, offerors may submit up to 3 project references that have been awarded, completed, or are ongoing within 3 years from the date of this solicita�on (SF 1442 Block 3).” However, in sec�on L.2.2.2.2 and L-2.2.2.4 it refers to sa�sfac�on ra�ngs and surveys from past performance to be in the last 5 years. Typically, these projects are the same (the relevant projects that we address and then the back up surveys/CPARS that we include). Can you please clarify if these years are correct, or if they both are supposed to have the same number of years?
A: Sec�ons L-2.2.2.2. and L-2.2.2.4. have been updated to reflect the correct number of years, THREE.
This was simply an administra�ve error. The projects can be the same for this as there is no intent for two separate groups of projects to be submited for the evalua�on.
Q: There is a contradic�on in the Past Performance. M-3.1.1 Recency refers (above) to 3 project references within the last THREE YEARS, and sec�on L.2.2.2.2 and L-2.2.2.4 refers to sa�sfac�on ra�ngs and surveys from the last FIVE years. As you know, these are typically the same projects; one with a narra�ve about what we did and POC info and then either a PPQ/CPAR (or leters/surveys are allowed in this one) that back up our narra�ve. Please advise.
A: Sec�ons L-2.2.2.2. and L-2.2.2.4. have been updated to reflect the correct number of years, THREE.
This was simply an administra�ve error. The projects can be the same for this as there is no intent for two separate groups of projects to be submited for the evalua�on.
Q: We request an extension to 6/20/24 to review the forthcoming Amendment answers and to coordinate with our subcontractors.
A: There will be no extension provided for this project as the Amendment answers do not substan�ally alter the solicita�on.
Q: Can Cold adhesive be used in lieu of the specified Hot Adhesive?
A: Either hot or cold adhesive can be used for this requirement.
Q: What are the site personnel requirements? Superintendent? Site Safety & Health Officer/ Quality Control Manager? Can these posi�ons be double or triple hated?
A: The qualified Superintendent may also be appointed as the Site Safety and Health Officer and the Quality Control Manager.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .