Attachment 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Amendment 3.pdf

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WASHERS AND DRYERS LEASE FAIRCHILD AFB, WA

SOLICITATION NO: FA462020Q0009

1. Your assistance is respectfully requested in providing information on the below present/past performance questionnaire. The importance of your opinion cannot be overstated since this survey will measure the present/past performance of each prospective offeror for providing a Washers and Dryers Lease at Fairchild AFB, WA.

2. INSTRUCTIONS FORM COMPLETION: Please fill this questionnaire in by hand or electronically and email the results to the Contract Specialist, TSgt Matthew Rumptz, at matthew.rumptz@us.af.mil.

Email submissions are preferred but you can also return by mail to the following address:

92 CONS/PKA

Attn: TSgt Matthew Rumptz or Mr. Zachery Ray 110 W. Ent St

Fairchild AFB WA 99011

3. Please direct questions to TSgt Matthew Rumptz (509) 247-3348. Your Participation is greatly appreciated.

4. PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 22 July 2020, at 1:00 PM (Pacific Time)

Section A: Contractor Information.

Contractor’s name and address:

a. Point of Contact:

b. Phone #:

c. Contract Number:

d. Project Title:

e. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

a. Respondent’s name and address: Organization: _

Address:

City: _ State: _ Zip: _

b. Respondent’s Name and Title:

c. Signature:

d. Commercial Phone #: DSN Phone #:

Fax #: E-Mail:

e. Contract Type (i.e.: Firm Fixed Price):

f. Award Amount: $ Final Amount: $

FA462020Q0009

Attachment 4

Amendment 003

g. What was the job title for this project?

What were the scope and major functions performed under this contract?

If you have questions regarding this questionnaire, please call TSgt Matthew Rumptz @ 509-247-3348.

For any ratings less than satisfactory rating, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.

1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Good Exceptional

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s proposed

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for

The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance was accomplished with few corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

satisfactory which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

CONTRACTOR PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

1. How was the process of getting leased equipment in place, installed, and working?

5. ____4. 3. 2. 1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. How was the overall age and condition of the leased equipment?

5.____4. 3. 2. 1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

FA462020Q0009

3. How well did the contractor meet timelines on getting failed equipment repaired?

5. 4. 3. 2. 1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

4. Was the contractor responsive to contract changes?

5. 4. 3. 2. 1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

5. How effective was the contractor in maintaining professional business relationships with government personnel and in resolving contract issues?

5. 4. 3. 2. 1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

6. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

5._ 4. 3. 2. 1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

7. Were Contract Discrepancy Reports (CDR) issued, Yes/No Were they addressed appropriately? Yes/No If so, how?

FA462020Q0009

8. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?

Yes____No____

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

9. Would you award another contract to this contractor? Yes___No

REMARKS:

FA462020Q0009