Attachment_4_-_Hazmat_Survey;_bldg_1256.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- FA4620-18-Q-A025 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4620-18-Q-A025
About this file
Hazmat Survey for Bldg 1256
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SF30_Amendment_05.pdf | ||
| SOW_Bldg_1712-1256_Electronic_Locks_12_Sep_18.pdf | ||
| SF30_Amendment_04.pdf | ||
| SF30_Amendment_03.pdf | ||
| SF30_Amendment_02.pdf | ||
| SF30_Amendment_01.pdf | ||
| Attachment_5_-_J&A_Redacted.pdf | ||
| FA462018QA025_-_Combo_RFQ_-SERE_Electronic_Locks.pdf | ||
| Attachment_2_-_Section_8_Openings_BDS.pdf | ||
| Attachment_3_-_Hazmat_Survey;_bldg_1712.pdf | ||
| Attachment_1-_Statement_of_Work_(SOW).pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MOUNTAIN CONSULTING SERVICES
9922 E Montgomery Drive; Suite 9
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
509-924-9236
509-924-2287
October 3, 2017
92nd CML Engineering Squadron
100 West Ent Street
Fairchild AFB, WA 99011-9688
MCS Project Number: 17-024.4
Dear Sir’s:
Mountain Consulting Services, (Mountain Consulting) is pleased to provide the enclosed report for the limited asbestos containing building materials survey conducted for the suspect interior wall materials and ceiling tiles present throughout the Bud Day Center in Building 1256 located on
Fairchild AFB, Washington.
Mr. Ryan Yocom, EPA-AHERA Building Inspector, certification: BIR-20170915-06, expiration:
9/15/18; conducted the field survey for this project on September 14th of 2017.
The following tested materials collected from within Building 1256 were proven to be Free of
Asbestos Minerals (ACM-Free):
Off White 2 x 4 Wormhole Acoustical Tiles throughout Building
Gypsum Wallboard Paneling (sheetrock throughout building)
Joint & Taping Compound Mud (of ceiling sheetrock)
The report must be kept on site during renovation activities for worker and regulatory review.
Thank you for choosing Mountain Consulting for these services. If you have any questions, or require any clarification concerning this report, please call me at (509) 924-9236. It was a pleasure working with you, and we look forward to working with you again in the future.
Sincerely, Mountain Consulting Services
Ryan Yocom
AHERA Building Inspector ryocum@mountainconsultingllc.com
FA4620-18-Q-A025
Attachment 04
Bldg 1256 Hazmat Survey mailto:ryocum@mountainconsultingllc.com
LIMITED ASBESTOS MATERIALS SURVEY
FOR THE
SUSPECT BUILDING MATERIALS PRESENT THROUGHOUT
THE BUD DAY CENTER IN BUILDING 1256
LOCATED ON
FAIRCHILD AFB, WASHINGTON
Project Number: 17-024.4
Prepared for:
92ND CML Engineering Squadron
100 W Ent Street
Fairchild AFB, WA 99011-9688
509-247-5020
Prepared by:
Mountain Consulting Services
9922 E Montgomery Drive, Suite 9
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
509-924-9236
October 3, 2017
MOUNTAIN CONSULTING SERVICES
FA4620-18-Q-A025
Attachment 04
October 3, 2017 Mountain Consulting Services
CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
3.0 ASSESSMENT SURVEY PARAMETERS
3.1 Homogeneous Areas
3.2 Bulk Sampling
3.3 Laboratory and Analytical Methods
4.0 RESULTS
4.1 Material Containing 1% or More Asbestos
4.2 Materials Assumed to Contain Asbestos
4.3 Materials with Asbestos Concentrations of Less than <1%
4.4 Non-ACM Materials
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusions
5.2 Recommendations
6.0 LIMITING CONDITIONS AND CLOSURE
6.1 Limiting Conditions
6.2 Closure
APPENDICES
A Certification and Accreditation
B Bulk Asbestos Sample Analysis Report
C Bulk Sample Locations Drawing
& Site Photographs
PROJECT NO: 17-024.4
LIMITED ACM SURVEY
October 3, 2017 PAGE 1 Mountain Consulting Services, LLC
LIMITED ASBESTOS SURVEY; IN SUPPORT OF A CCTV SYSTEM PROJECT; BUD
DAY CENTER; BUILDING 1256; FAIRCHILD AFB, WA
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The 92nd CML Engineering Squadron of Fairchild AFB, contracted Mountain Consulting Services, (Mountain Consulting) to conduct a limited asbestos containing materials survey for the suspect interior building materials present throughout the Bud Day Center in Building 1256, located on
Fairchild AFB, Washington. The survey was conducted to facilitate a CCTV systems replacement project.
Mr. Ryan Yocom; EPA-accredited AHERA building inspector, certification: BIR-20170915-06, expiration: 9/15/18, conducted a limited field survey of the identified building area/materials on
September 14thof 2017. [Refer to Appendix A for inspector certifications & laboratory accreditations].
SITE DESCRIPTION
Building 1256 is a newer single-story masonry & steel constructed offices/survival school educations structure, built on a concrete slab foundation. The building is located within the newer survival school buildings complex portion of Fairchild AFB on the southern half of the base accessed from Thorpe Road and Survival Loop.
For this survey only the suspect interior drywall, joint compound and ceiling tiles materials from the
Bud Day Center wing of the building interior were targeted to be tested for asbestos content to facilitate a scheduled CCTV System project. The suspect materials to be impacted for this project were identified by the 92nd CML Engineering Squadron representative.
Fairchild AFB is located west of the City of Airway Heights, Washington in Spokane County. The
Air Force Base is bordered by Highway 2 to the north, Rambo Road to the east, Medical Lake Road to the south, and Graham Road to the west.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
ASBESTOS MATERIALS SURVEY: The scope for limited asbestos survey work was designed to meet the requirements for asbestos inspection and due diligence notification in the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Asbestos Standard (29 CFR 1926.1101), the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP; 40 CFR 61), and applicable portions of the
Asbestos Hazardous Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and regulations in 40 CFR 763.
FA4620-18-Q-A025
October 3, 2017 PAGE 2 Mountain Consulting Services, LLC
This survey was conducted through visual evaluation, classification and analysis of suspected
ACM’s used in the construction or remodeling of the surveyed area/select materials within the identified structure. The survey included the following tasks:
Visual survey and assessment of the location and condition of suspected materials.
Collection and analysis of bulk samples from suspected ACM materials.
Preparation of a report summarizing the identification and assessment of any ACM materials.
3.0 ASSESSMENT SURVEY PARAMETERS
3.1 HOMOGENEOUS MATERIALS
Homogeneous materials are those considered to be consistent throughout an area based on color, texture, and construction era. For the purpose of this survey, homogeneous areas were delineated using the construction era, material composition, and material location as the primary considerations.
Material appearance, texture, size, color, and analytical results may support assumptions about each material’s homogeneity.
3.2 BULK SAMPLING
Suspected ACMs were collected according to guidelines in 40 CFR 763.85 and were sampled to determine the type and percentage of asbestos by volume. At least Two (2) Samples were collected from each selected miscellaneous material type; at least Three (3) Samples from each thermal system insulation (TSI) materials; and suspect surfacing materials were sampled according to the AHERA
“3/5/7 rule” for spray or trowel applied materials.
For other types of suspect materials, or materials assumed to be non-ACM, regulations require the on-site AHERA building inspector to determine the appropriate number of samples. The quantity of material present, manufacturer’s labels, appearance, construction or renovation era, and inspector’s expertise were used to determine the number of samples.
A homogeneous material is considered to be a Regulated ACM if one or more sample results produce greater than 1% asbestos. The EPA recommends that at least three samples be analyzed by polarized-light microscopy (PLM) for the following types of materials in order to prevent false negative results (less then <1% asbestos):
Materials that contain low concentrations of asbestos fibers (less than 10%);
Materials with asbestos fibers tightly bound in a matrix;
Materials with milled asbestos fibers (fine fibers);
Materials with hand-mixed asbestos fibers; and
Materials with a combination of these characteristics.
FA4620-18-Q-A025
October 3, 2017 PAGE 3 Mountain Consulting Services, LLC
All bulk samples must have results below 1% asbestos before the material may be classified in accordance with AHERA rule as not being Regulated ACM. If asbestos is detected in the material at less than <1%, WISHA worker health and safety due diligence regulations still apply.
3.3 LABORATORY AND ANALYTICAL METHODS
Mountain Consulting submitted for analysis Ten (10) bulk asbestos material samples collected from
Five (5) different homogeneous suspect building materials targeted for testing. During laboratory analysis, three (3) bulk samples were sub-divided, and one sample was not analyzed resulting in a total of thirteen (13) samples analyzed for this project.
The samples were submitted for analysis to Mountain Laboratories of Spokane Valley, Washington using proper chain of custody procedures. Mountain Laboratories participates in the national voluntary laboratory accreditation program (NAVLAP) and is a NAVLAP accredited asbestos testing laboratory, NAVLAP code: 101890-0. Laboratory accreditation certificates are provided in
Appendix A.
4.0 RESULTS
This section describes suspect materials that were found to be asbestos containing (Regulated ACM) or proven to be free of asbestos minerals (ACM-Free). [Refer to the bulk sample analysis report in
Appendix B for specific sample composition and the site drawing in Appendix C for sampling locations].
4.1 MATERIAL CONTAINING 1% OR MORE ASBESTOS
ACMs are materials proven to contain at least 1% asbestos or greater. AHERA and NESHAP regulations distinguish between friable and non-friable forms of ACM. A friable material is defined as one that can be “crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry.”
Friability is an indication of a material’s ability to release asbestos fibers into the air. Regulated
ACMs are defined by NESHAP as all friable ACM and non-friable ACM that may be disturbed by renovation or demolition.
All samples suspect building materials included for asbestos content testing for this project were proven to be ACM-Free. Refer to Section 4.4 for a list of materials tested.
4.2 MATERIALS ASSUMED TO CONTAIN ASBESTOS
No suspect materials were assumed to contain asbestos during this survey activity.
FA4620-18-Q-A025
October 3, 2017 PAGE 4 Mountain Consulting Services, LLC
4.3 MATERIALS WITH ASBESTOS CONCENTRATIONS OF LESS THAN <1%
No analyzed materials were proven to contain less than 1 percent (<1%) asbestos during this survey activity.
4.4 NON-ACM MATERIALS
Microscopic examination of samples collected from the following suspect building materials in support of the CCTV System project for Building 1256, did not detect the presence of asbestos minerals (ACM-Free):
White / Light Gray Acoustic Ceiling Tiles Throughout Building (samples 1 & 2)
Gypsum Wallboard Paneling (sheetrock in Room 141 & 130B) (samples 3 & 4)
Joint & Taping Compound (associated with tested S/R) (sub-samples 4A)
Gypsum Wallboard Paneling (sheetrock in Room 136 & 137) (samples 5 & 6)
Joint & Taping Compound (associated with tested S/R) (sub-samples 5A & 6A)
Gypsum Wallboard Paneling (sheetrock in Room 142E) (samples 7 & 8)
Gypsum Wallboard Paneling (sheetrock in Rooms 138 & 139) (samples 9 & 10)
5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Our findings are based strictly on information obtained from our site observations and from sample analysis during survey activities. Consistent with our knowledge and understanding of environmental regulations, particularly as they apply to the potential liabilities associated with asbestos-containing building materials, we present the following conclusions and recommendations.
5.1 CONCLUSIONS
The tested and analyzed building materials proven to be free of asbestos require no further action in regards to asbestos regulations. These materials may be impacted without any specialized personnel training and disposed of in a landfill that accepts standard construction debris.
5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
If any materials not identified in this survey are uncovered during renovation or demolition, they must be assumed to contain asbestos until sampling and analysis prove otherwise. ACM must be handled in accordance with OSHA, NESHAP, and local regulations.
The Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency (SRCAA), the local building department and the local fire department should be contacted regarding possible permit requirements.
FA4620-18-Q-A025
October 3, 2017 PAGE 5 Mountain Consulting Services, LLC
6.0 LIMITING CONDITIONS AND CLOSURE
6.1 LIMITING CONDITIONS
We have exercised reasonable efforts to accomplish the tasks for this project using current professional standards of the industry. To the extent that the services require subjective judgment, there can be no assurance that definitive or desired results have been obtained or that they will be usable. Although based on scientific principles, to the extent that results depend on subjective judgment, they are subject to human error.
The suspect building materials to be impacted during the scheduled renovation project were identified by the 92nd CML Engineering Squadron representative. Only the specific materials / building areas identified in this report are covered by the conclusions presented.
6.2 CLOSURE
The results, conclusions, and recommendations in this report were prepared following our inspection of suspected ACM at the subject property. Methods used by Mountain Consulting for this study are consistent with the standard of care and professionalism normally exercised by consultants in environmental science and engineering. The Client acknowledges that Mountain Consulting has been retained for the sole purpose of assisting the Client to identify ACM, if any, associated with the subject structure.
It is agreed that Mountain Consulting has assumed responsibility only for performing this inspection, limited to the identified areas and presenting this report and conclusions to the Client.
The Client acknowledges that Mountain Consulting is not acting as an “agent” for the Client, or any other user or entity, for work associated with any asbestos-containing materials.
This report was prepared for the exclusive use of the 92nd CML Engineering Squadron of Fairchild
Air Force Base, Washington and/or representatives thereof. It may only be reproduced in full and with written approval of Mountain Consulting and is not warranted if any portion of it is separated from the original complete document.
FA4620-18-Q-A025
October 3, 2017 PAGE 6 Mountain Consulting Services, LLC
STATEMENT OF PROFESSIONALISM
Mountain Consulting Services, hereby certifies that the limited asbestos containing building materials survey conducted for the suspect interior building materials present throughout the Bud
Day Center in Building 1256 located on Fairchild AFB, Washington, was conducted under modified protocols of 40 CFR 763.85. All policies and procedures described in 40 CFR 763 have been followed. All work and statements contained herein are certified true and correct to the best of
Mountain Consulting’s ability.
Inspector: __________________________________ Date: October 3, 2017
Ryan Yocom
AHERA Building Inspector
Certification: BIR-20170915-06
Expiration: September 15, 2018
APPENDIX A
CERTIFICATION AND ACCREDITATION
FA4620-18-Q-A025
Certificate of Completion Ryan Yocom has successfully completed
4-Hr AHERA Certified Building Inspector Refresher Training
In compliance with TSCA Title II AHERA 40 CFR Part 763 as approved by the State of Missouri
Kyron Environmental Accreditation #MO-129 Date of Training: September 15, 2017 in Spokane, WA
Certificate # BIR20170915-06
Tim Brady, Instructor Expires: 09/15/2018
FA4620-18-Q-A025
APPENDIX B
BULK ASBESTOS MATERIALS
ANALYSIS REPORT
FA4620-18-Q-A025
9922 East Montgomery Suite 13 NVLAP LAB CODE 101890-0
(509) 922-1365 ● Fax (509) 922-1380
Polarized Light Microscopy, NVLAP Accreditation
September 26, 2017
Mountain Consulting Services, LLC Project: FAFB Bldg. 1256 (Bud Day Center)
Ryan Yocom Project #: 17-024.4
9922 E. Montgomery Drive, Suite 9
Dear Mr. Yocom, The enclosed report details results for the analysis of the bulk sample(s) submitted to Mountain
Laboratories on September 14, 2017. Sample analysis was performed to determine asbestos type and content using Polarized Light Microscopy, supplemented by Dispersion Staining (PLM/DS).
This report includes a summary of the analytical results and chain of custody. Analytical results are only reflective of the samples, which were tested and presented in this report. Mountain Laboratories limits warranty to proper analysis methods and takes no responsibility for sample procurement.
It has been our pleasure providing you with these analytical services. If you have any questions regarding this report, please do not hesitate to call us at (509) 922-1365.
Sincerely, Heidi L. McCarthy
Laboratory Manager
Mountain Laboratories
Mountain Laboratories NW, Inc.
Enclosure: 1023.37499.37508H
MOUNTAIN LABORATORIES
BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS FOR ASBESTOS
Test Method: EPA-600/R-93/116: Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. Customer #: 1023
Laboratory No. B17-37499 B17-37500 B17-37501
Sample ID No. 17-024.4-01 17-024.4-02 17-024.4-03
Sample Description Acoustic Tile Acoustic Tile Drywall Composite
Sample Treatment Teased/Crushed
Heated
Teased/Crushed
Heated Teased/Crushed
Homogeneous No No No
Layered Yes Yes Yes
Fibrous Yes Yes Yes
Sample Color White/Light Gray White/Light Gray Brown/Off White
Asbestos Present No No No
Asbestos Type and
Percentage
1. Chrysotile
2. Amosite
3. Crocidolite
4. Other
N.D. N.D. Drywall: N.D.
Total % Asbestos None None None
Other Fibrous Material
In Sample
Cellulose 44%
Mineral Wool 25%
Cellulose 44%
Mineral Wool 25%
Cellulose 5%
Glass Fibers <1%
Non-Fibrous Material:
Perlite 10%
Binder/Filler 20%
Other <1%
Perlite 10%
Binder/Filler 20%
Other <1%
Binder/Filler 5%
Gypsum 88%
Paint <1%
Other 100% Date Analyzed: September 26, 2017 Analyzed By: Heidi L. McCarthy
Mountain Laboratories, Mountain Laboratories NW, Inc. limits warranty to proper analysis methods only and takes no responsibility for sample procurement. Mountain Laboratories, Mountain
Laboratories NW, Inc., 9922 E. Montgomery Suite #13, Spokane Washington 99206 (509) 922-1365 - Fax (509) 922-1380. PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples. Thus negative or <1% PLM results should be tested with either SEM or TEM. Customer is responsible for sample separation. This report may only be reproduced in full with written approval by Mountain Laboratories. Soil/Dust samples are not covered under NVLAP Accreditation.
Sample results must not be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government.
Test Method: EPA-600/R-93/116: Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. Customer #: 1023
Laboratory No. B17-37502 B17-39057 B17-37503
Sample ID No. 17-024.4-04 17-024.4-04-A 17-024.4-05
Sample Description Drywall Composite
Sub-sample of
17-024.4-04
Top Layer
Drywall Composite
Sample Treatment Teased/Crushed Teased/Crushed
Heated Teased/Crushed
Homogeneous No No No
Layered Yes Yes Yes
Fibrous Yes No Yes
Sample Color Brown/Off White White/Off White Brown/Off White
Asbestos Present No No No
Asbestos Type and
Percentage
1. Chrysotile
2. Amosite
3. Crocidolite
4. Other
Drywall: N.D. Top Layer: N.D. Drywall: N.D.
Total % Asbestos None None None
Other Fibrous Material
In Sample
Cellulose 5%
Glass Fibers <1%
Cellulose 5%
Glass Fibers <1%
Non-Fibrous Material:
Binder/Filler 5%
Gypsum 88%
Paint <1%
Other 100%
Gypsum 99%
Paint <1%
Other 100%
Binder/Filler 5%
Gypsum 88%
Paint <1%
Mountain Laboratories, Mountain Laboratories NW, Inc. limits warranty to proper analysis methods only and takes no responsibility for sample procurement. Mountain Laboratories, Mountain
Laboratories NW, Inc., 9922 E. Montgomery Suite #13, Spokane Washington 99206 (509) 922-1365 - Fax (509) 922-1380. PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples. Thus negative or <1% PLM results should be tested with either SEM or TEM. Customer is responsible for sample separation. This report may only be reproduced in full with written
Sample results must not be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government.
Test Method: EPA-600/R-93/116: Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. Customer #: 1023
Laboratory No. B17-39058 B17-37504 B17-39059
Sample ID No. 17-024.4-05-A 17-024.4-06 17-024.4-06-A
Sample Description
Sub-sample of
17-024.4-05
Top 2 Layers
Paper Layer
Drywall Composite
Sub-sample of
17-024.4-06
Paper Layer
Off White Layer
Sample Treatment Teased/Crushed
Heated Teased/Crushed
Teased/Crushed
Heated
Homogeneous No No No
Layered Yes Yes Yes
Fibrous Yes Yes Yes
Sample Color White/Off White Tan/Off White White/Off White
Asbestos Present No No No
Asbestos Type and
Percentage
1. Chrysotile
2. Amosite
3. Crocidolite
4. Other
Top 2 Layers: N.D.
Paper Layer: N.D.
N.D. Paper Layer: N.D.
Off White Layer: N.D.
Total % Asbestos None None None
Other Fibrous Material
In Sample
Paper Layer:
Cellulose 98%
Cellulose 5% Paper Layer:
Cellulose 98%
Non-Fibrous Material:
Paper Layer:
Binder/Filler 2%
Top 2 Layers:
Gypsum 99%
Paint <1%
Other 100%
Binder/Filler 5%
Gypsum 90%
Paper Layer:
Binder/Filler 2%
Off White Layer:
Gypsum 99%
Paint <1%
Mountain Laboratories, Mountain Laboratories NW, Inc. limits warranty to proper analysis methods only and takes no responsibility for sample procurement. Mountain Laboratories, Mountain
Laboratories NW, Inc., 9922 E. Montgomery Suite #13, Spokane Washington 99206 (509) 922-1365 - Fax (509) 922-1380. PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples. Thus negative or <1% PLM results should be tested with either SEM or TEM. Customer is responsible for sample separation. This report may only be reproduced in full with written
Sample results must not be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government.
Test Method: EPA-600/R-93/116: Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. Customer #: 1023
Laboratory No. B17-37505 B17-37506 B17-37507
Sample ID No. 17-024.4-07 17-024.4-08 17-024.4-09
Sample Description Drywall Drywall Drywall Composite
Sample Treatment Teased/Crushed Teased/Crushed Teased/Crushed
Heated
Homogeneous No No No
Layered Yes Yes Yes
Fibrous Yes Yes Yes
Sample Color Tan/Off White Tan/Off White Tan/Off White
Asbestos Present No No No
Asbestos Type and
Percentage
1. Chrysotile
2. Amosite
3. Crocidolite
4. Other
N.D. N.D. Drywall: N.D.
Total % Asbestos None None None
Other Fibrous Material
In Sample
Cellulose 5% Cellulose 5%
Glass Fibers <1%
Cellulose 5%
Glass Fibers <1%
Non-Fibrous Material:
Binder/Filler 5%
Gypsum 90%
Binder/Filler 5%
Gypsum 89%
Binder/Filler 5%
Gypsum 88%
Paint <1%
Other 100%
Drywall only in sample.
Mountain Laboratories, Mountain Laboratories NW, Inc. limits warranty to proper analysis methods only and takes no responsibility for sample procurement. Mountain Laboratories, Mountain
Laboratories NW, Inc., 9922 E. Montgomery Suite #13, Spokane Washington 99206 (509) 922-1365 - Fax (509) 922-1380. PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples. Thus negative or <1% PLM results should be tested with either SEM or TEM. Customer is responsible for sample separation. This report may only be reproduced in full with written
Sample results must not be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government.
Test Method: EPA-600/R-93/116: Interim Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. Customer #: 1023
Laboratory No. B17-37508
Sample ID No. 17-024.4-10
Sample Description Drywall Composite
Sample Treatment Teased/Crushed
Heated
Homogeneous No
Layered Yes
Fibrous Yes
Sample Color Tan/Off White
Asbestos Present No
Asbestos Type and
Percentage
1. Chrysotile
2. Amosite
3. Crocidolite
4. Other
Drywall: N.D.
Total % Asbestos None
Other Fibrous Material
In Sample
Cellulose 5%
Glass Fibers <1%
Non-Fibrous Material:
Binder/Filler 5%
Gypsum 88%
Paint <1%
Other 100%
Drywall only in sample.
Mountain Laboratories, Mountain Laboratories NW, Inc. limits warranty to proper analysis methods only and takes no responsibility for sample procurement. Mountain Laboratories, Mountain
Laboratories NW, Inc., 9922 E. Montgomery Suite #13, Spokane Washington 99206 (509) 922-1365 - Fax (509) 922-1380. PLM has been known to miss asbestos in a small percentage of samples. Thus negative or <1% PLM results should be tested with either SEM or TEM. Customer is responsible for sample separation. This report may only be reproduced in full with written
Sample results must not be used by the customer to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government.
APPENDIX C
SAMPLE LOCATIONS DRAWING
& SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
GYPSUM BOARD WALL SYSTEM, INCLUDING
JOINT COMPOUND, PROVEN ACM-FREE BY
LABORATORY ANALYSIS.
2' X 4' WORMHOLE-PATTERNED ACOUSTIC
CEILING TILES PROVEN ACM-FREE BY
LABORATORY ANALYSIS.
| 17-024.4 FAFB 1256 L-ACM Rpt |
| Ryan Yocom_AHERA BIR 2017 Cert |
| Mountain Lab NVLAP |
| 17-024.4 FAFB 1256 L-ACM Rpt |
| 37499 37508H |
| 17-024.4 FAFB 1256 L-ACM Rpt |
| Survey Drawing Template.dwg 1-Model |
| Photo Page |
File details come from the government source that posted it.