Preproposal_Conference_January_2013.pdf

30th Space Wing

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e

Mini SABER

William Davis– 30CONS

Mark Barnick – 30 CES January 2013

WELCOME

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 3

AGENDA

•Introduction

•Rules of Engagement

•Contract Characteristics

•Evaluation Method: Award Criteria

•Milestones

•Period of Performance

•CLINS

•Developing Pricing

•Technical Specifications

•Award Criteria

•Contact Information

•Questions

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 4

Rules of Engagement

Questions pertaining to this conference can be asked at any time.

Response for previous submitted questions submitted will be provided to all offerors and posted on FedBizOpps.

All other questions/comments pertaining to the RFP, terms & conditions, Technical Specifications, attachments or exhibits must be submitted in writing NLT COB 24 January 2013.

Q & As (along with info from this briefing) will be posted on or about 29 January 2013.

RFP (and any amendments) takes precedent over anything said in this briefing or answers to any questions.

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 5

Contract Characteristics

100% Small Business 8a Set-Aside

Teaming and Partnering Arrangements Encouraged

IDIQ: Statement of Work per Task Order

Firm-Fixed Price

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 6

Evaluation Method: Award Criteria

Evaluation Award Criteria:

Price

Technically Acceptable

Determined through submission of an offer IAW with all terms and conditions of the RFP

Evaluation Method:

Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA)

Ensure you complete Section K, Reps & Certs (ORCA)

Executed Proposal:

Using guidelines and instructions provided in section L

A completed Exhibit A

Evaluation Method: Award Criteria

The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions

All coefficients from all CLINS will be added and averaged

Then all proposals will be ranked from lowest to highest

The (2) lowest priced proposals will be evaluated for technical acceptability

If the lowest priced proposal is technically acceptable it will be awarded one of the two contracts

The second lowest priced proposal will be evaluated for technical acceptability (if technically acceptable it will be awarded one of the two contracts)

If the lowest two proposal are not technically acceptable the

Government will move on to the next lowest priced and evaluate for technical acceptability.

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 8

Acquisition Milestones

Proposals Due 04 February 2013

Anticipated Award Date 21 May 2013

Performance Start 19 June 2013

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 9

Basic year & a One-year option:

(CLIN 0001) Basic Year: 19 June 2013 – 18 June 2014

(CLIN 1001) 1st Option Year: 19 June 2014 – 18 June 2015

NOTE: Dates to be determined

Period of Performance

CLIN/ Co-efficient Structure

Base Yr- TBD 2013 – TBD 2014

FFP

The contractor shall perform maintenance, repair, and minor construction IAW

Attachment 1, Specifications for Simplified Acquisition of Base Engineering

Requirement (SABER) and as identified by other specific specifications/work statements in each task order issued against the contract.

COEFFICIENTS - to be completed by Offeror:

0001 Standard Hours ____________

0002 Non-Standard Hours ____________

Developing Pricing

• Will go over the worksheet upon conclusion of this presentation

•Coefficients are factors multiplied against the standard unit prices in the UPG to calculate TO prices

• Offerors propose coefficients for costs such as overhead, profit, minimum design costs, G&A expenses, bond premiums, and gross receipt taxes

• Other possible expenses to be placed in your coefficient:

• local office expense

• RS Means training (Base Year)

Warnings

If you submit a negative coefficient, you are going to have to live with it. Don’t look to the government for empathy

Line Item Quantities are vital, not only do they tell us how many widgets you are going to use, they are used, on occasion, to de-scope a project and are required to make a equitable resolution.

Technical Specification:

Organizational Structure

Provide an organizational chart identifying all key personnel with a description of their work experience relating to projects similar in scope to those expected under SABER.

Include the organization’s program management policies, procedures, and processes

Note we do not want resumes

Contractor License

Offeror must possess a current California State Contractor’s

License Type A or B.

Bonding Capacity

Offeror must provide evidence that it is able to obtain a minimum single project bonding capacity of $3M and a minimum aggregate bonding capacity of $10M.

Document must include surety company’s name, address, phone number, and points of contact.

Quality and Safety Overview

Offeror must demonstrate its ability to design and implement a

Quality Control and Safety Plan in accordance with General

Specifications Section 01 45 01.

(Past Performance) Relevant & Recency

• Relevant

• Within the scope of the solicitation

• Should be exceed $100,000

• Should be a repair and/or renovation project

• If less than $100,000 it will be considered technically unacceptable

•Recency

• Should be within the last three years

• From the date of the solicitation

• If older, it will be considered not technically acceptable

Past Performance

• Submit three satisfactory past performance examples

• Must be relevant

• Must be recent (within three years)

•DO NOT submit more than three, only three will be evaluated

•Note if more than three are submitted only the first three will be evaluated the rest will not be evaluated. Past performances below a satisfactory level will be considered technically unacceptable.

Warnings

• If your proposal is found to be nonresponsive, your proposal will not be evaluated.

• Example, submitting only one of three volumes

• Not signing the solicitation

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 21

Contact Information

Submit all unanswered questions via email to:

William Davis: william.davis.18@us.af.mil

Jessica Nelson: jessica.nelson.6@us.af.mil

Jeffrey Grelck: jeffrey.grelck@us.af.mil

Collin Ewell: collin.ewell@us.af.mi

CostWork RS Means Contact

Grayson Briggs

770-849-6410

Direct Contact information for training quotes

QUESTIONS ?